The lethal and sublethal effects of the aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum on Baltic littoral planktivores

Limnology and Oceanography

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 405-411

  Lindén, Eveliina ^a,b,c   Lehtiniemi, Maiju ^b,c  

^a FINNISH INSTITUTE OF MARINE RESEARCH   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELOCHEMICAL; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; HABITAT USE; INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTION; LITTORAL ENVIRONMENT; MACROPHYTE; MORTALITY; PLANKTIVORE; SUBLETHAL EFFECT;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA; OCEANIC REGIONS; WORLD;

CHARA TOMENTOSA; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; MYRIOPHYLLUM SIBIRICUM; MYRIOPHYLLUM SPICATUM; MYSIDAE; NEOMYSIS INTEGER; PERCA FLUVIATILIS; PRAUNUS FLEXUOSUS;

EID: 15944378234     PISSN: 00243590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2005.50.2.0405     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. AGAMI, M., AND Y. WAISEL. 1985. Inter-relationships between Najas marina L. and three other species of aquatic macrophytes. Hydrobiologia 126: 169-173.
2. ANTHONI, U., C. CHRISTOPHERSEN, J. ØGÅRD MADSEN, S. WIUM-ANDERSEN, AND N. JACOBSEN. 1980. Biologically active sulphur compounds from the green alga Chara globularis. Phytochemistry 19: 1228-1229.
3. BANKOVA, V., AND OTHERS. 2001. Secondary metabolites and lipids in Chara globularis Thuill. Hydrobiologia 457: 199-203.
4. BERGER, J., AND M. SCHAGERL. 2003. Allelopathic activity of Chara aspera. Hydrobiologia 501: 109-115.
5. BISHOP, T. D., AND J. A. BROWN. 1992. Threat-sensitive foraging by larval threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 133-138.
6. BURKS, R. L., E. JEPPESEN, AND D. M. LODGE. 2000. Macrophyte and fish chemicals suppress Daphnia growth and alter life-history traits. Oikos 88: 139-147.
7. _, AND _. 2001. Littoral zone structures as Daphnia refugia against fish predators. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46: 230-237.
8. COULL, B. C., AND J. B. J. WELLS. 1983. Refuges from fish predation: Experiments with phytal meiofauna from the New Zealand rocky intertidal. Ecology 64: 1599-1609.
9. CRONIN, G., AND M. E. HAY. 1996a. Susceptibility to herbivores depends on recent history of both the plant and animal. Ecology 77: 1531-1543.
10. _, AND _. 1996b. Induction of seaweed chemical defenses by amphipod grazing. Ecology 77: 2287-2301.
11. _, AND D. M. LODGE. 2003. Effects of light and nutrient availability on the growth, allocation, carbon/nitrogen balance, phenolic chemistry, and resistance to herbivory of two freshwater macrophytes. Oecologia 137: 32-41.
12. DHILLON, M. S., M. S. MULLA, AND Y. HWANG. 1982. Allelochemics produced by the hydrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum affecting mosquitoes and midges. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 517-526.
13. EJDUNG, G. 1998. Behavioural responses to chemical cues of predation risk in a three-trophic-level Baltic Sea food chain. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 165: 137-144.
14. FITZGERALD, G. J., AND R. J. WOOTTON. 1993. The behavioural ecology of sticklebacks, p. 169-196. In T. J. Pitcher [ed.], Behaviour of teleost fishes. Chapman & Hall.
15. FLYNN, A. J., AND D. A. RITZ. 1999. Effect of habitat complexity and predatory style on the capture success of fish feeding on aggregated prey. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79: 487-494.
16. GROSS, E. M. 2003. Allelopathy in aquatic autotrophs. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 22: 313-339.
17. HANGELIN, C., AND I. VUORINEN. 1988. Food selection in juvenile three-spined sticklebacks studied in relation to size, abundance and biomass of prey. Hydrobiologia 157: 169-177.
18. HASLER, A. D., AND E. JONES. 1949. Demonstration of the antagonistic action of large aquatic plants on algae and rotifers. Ecology 30: 359-364.
19. JACOBSEN, N., AND L. PEDERSEN. 1983. Synthesis and insecticidal properties of derivatives of propane-1,3-dithiol (analogues of the insecticidal derivatives of dithiolane and trithiane from the alga Chara globularis Thuillier). Pestic. Sci. 14: 90-97.
20. JAKOBSEN, P. J., G. H. JOHNSEN, AND P. LARSSON. 1988. Effects of predation risk and parasitism on the feeding ecology, habitat use, and abundance of lacustrine threes pine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45: 426-431.
21. JOHNSON, G. D., AND M. S. MULLA. 1983. An aquatic macrophyte affecting nuisance chironomid midges in a warm-water lake. Environ. Entomol. 12: 266-269.
22. KOISTINEN, M., AND R. MUNSTERHJELM. 2001. Charophytes of the Finnish coastal waters. Schr.reihe Landschaftspflege Naturschutz 72: 27-29.
23. LAURIDSEN, T. L., AND D. M. LODGE. 1996. Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: Chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41: 794-798.
24. LEHTINIEMI, M. In press. Swim or hide - predator cues cause species specific reactions in young fish larvae. J. Fish. Biol.
25. LEVIN, D. A. 1971. Plant phenolics: An ecological perspective. Am. Nat. 105: 157-181.
26. LIMA, S. L., AND L. M. DILL. 1990. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619-640.
27. LINDÉN, E., M. LEHTINIEMI, AND M. VIITASALO. 2003. Predator avoidance behaviour of Baltic littoral mysids Neomysis integer and Praunus flexuosus. Mar. Biol. 143: 845-850.
28. MATHESON, R. 1930. The utilization of aquatic plants as aids in mosquito control. Am. Nat. 64: 56-86.
29. MAUCHLINE, J. 1971. Seasonal occurrence of mysids (Crustacea) and evidence of social behaviour. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 51: 809-825.
30. _. 1980. The biology of mysids and euphasiids. Adv. Mar. Biol. 18: 1-369.
31. MILINSKI, M., AND R. HELLER. 1978. Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Nature 275: 642-644.
32. MOSS, B., R. KORNIJOW, AND G. J. MEASEY. 1998. The effects of nymphaeid (Nuphar lutea) density and predation by perch (Perca fluviatilis) on the zooplankton communities in a shallow lake. Freshw. Biol. 39: 689-697.
33. MUNSTERHJELM, R. 1997. The aquatic macrophyte vegetation of flads and gloes, S coast of Finland. Acta Bot. Fenn. 157: 1-68.
34. NAKAI, S., Y. INOUE, AND M. HOSOMI. 2001. Algal growth inhibition effects and inducement modes by plant-producing phenols. Water Res. 35: 1855-1859.
35. NICHOLS, S. A., AND B. H. SHAW. 1986. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiologia 131: 3-21.
36. NIMMO, D. R., AND T. L. HAMAKER. 1982. Mysids in toxicity testing - a review. Hydrobiologia 93: 171-178.
37. PEDERSEN, B. H. 1997. The cost of growth in young fish larvae, a review of new hypotheses. Aquaculture 155: 259-269.
38. PENNAK, R. W. 1973. Some evidence for aquatic macrophytes as repellents for a limnetic species of Daphnia. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 58: 569-576.
39. REIMCHEN, T. E. 1994. Predation and morphological evolution in threespine stickleback, p. 240-276. In M. A. Bell and S. A. Foster [eds.], The evolutionary biology of the threespine stickleback. Oxford Univ. Press.
40. ROAST, S. D., R. S. THOMPSON, J. WIDDOWS, AND M. B. JONES. 1998. Mysids and environmental monitoring: A case for their use in estuaries. Mar. Freshw. Res. 40: 827-832.
41. ROMARE, P., AND L.-A. HANSSON. 2003. A behavioral cascade: Top-predator induced behavioral shifts in planktivorous fish and zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48: 1956-1964.
42. SCHUBERT, H., AND M. A. M. YOUSEF. 2001. Charophytes in the Baltic Sea - threats and conservation. Schr.reihe Landschaftspflege Naturschutz 72: 7-8.
43. SINGLETON, V. L., AND F. H. KRATZER. 1969. Toxicity and related physiological activity of phenolic substances of plant origin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17: 497-512.
44. SPENCER, D. F., AND G. G. KSANDER. 1999. Phenolic acids and nutrient content for aquatic macrophytes from Fall River, California. J. Freshw. Ecol. 14: 197-209.
45. SUNDELL, J. 1994. Dynamics and composition of littoral fish fauna along the coast of SW-Finland. Aqua Fenn. 24: 37-49.
46. THIEL, R. 1996. The impact of fish predation on the zooplankton community in a southern Baltic bay. Limnologica 26: 123-137.
47. URHO, L. 2002. The importance of larvae and nursery areas for fish production. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Helsinki.
48. VIITASALO, M., T. KIØrboe, J. Flinkman, L. W. Pedersen, and A. W. Visser. 1998. Predation vulnerability of planktonic copepods: Consequences of predator foraging strategies and prey sensory abilities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 175: 129-142.
49. _, I. VUORINEN, AND S. SAESMAA. 1995. Mesozooplankton dynamics in the northern Baltic Sea: Implications of variations in hydrography and climate. J. Plankton Res. 17: 1857-1878.