The fruits of intellectual production: Economic and scientific specialisation among OECD countries

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 289-308

  Laursen, Keld ^a   Salter, Ammon ^b  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bibliometric data; International economic specialisation; Scientific specialisation

Indexed keywords

ECONOMETRICS; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; SPECIALIZATION;

EID: 15944374324     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bei032     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Amable, B. and Verspagen, B. 1995. The role of technology in market shares dynamics, Applied Economics, vol. 27, 197-204
2. Arundel, A., van de Paal, G. and Soete, L. L. G. 1995. Innovation Strategies of Europe's Largest Industrial Firms, PACE Report, Maastricht, MERIT, University of Limburg
3. Balassa, B. 1965. Trade liberalization and 'revealed' comparative advantage, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, vol. 32, 99-123
4. Barfield, C. (ed.) 1997. Science for the Twenty-first Century: The Bush Report Revisited, Washington, D. C., The American Enterprise Institute Press
5. Bernal, J. D. 1939. The Social Foundation of Science, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul
6. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal 1989. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D, Economic Journal, vol. 99, 569-96
7. Dasgupta, P. and David, P. 1994. Towards a new economics of science, Research Policy, vol. 23, 487-522
8. David, P. 1996. '"Science Reorganized?" Post-Modern Visions of Research and the Curse of Success', MERIT Working Paper 1996-002, University of Limburg, Maastricht
9. Freeman, C. 1999. The social function of science, in Aprahamian, F. (ed.), J. D. Bernal: A Life in Science and Politics, London, Verso
10. Freeman, C. 2001. 'Comment on "The Fruits of Intellectual Production"', SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex, UK
11. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. L. G. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, London, Pinter
12. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotony, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge, London, Sage
13. Grupp, H. 1998. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation, Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US, Edward Elgar
14. Gustavsson, P., Hansson, P. and Lundberg, L. 1999. Technology, resource endowments and international competitiveness, European Economic Review, vol. 43, 1501-30
15. Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D. and Hamilton, K. 2001. The changing composition of innovative activity in the US - a portrait based on patent analysis, Research Policy, vol. 30, 681-703
16. Hicks, D., Ishizuka, T., Keen, P. and Sweet, S. 1994. Japanese corporations, scientific research and globalization, Research Policy vol. 23, 375-84
17. Hicks, D. and Katz, J. S. 1996. 'Systemic bibliometric indicators for the knowledge-based economy', paper presented at the OECD Workshop on New Indicators for the Knowledge-Based Economy, OECD, Pads, 19-21 June
18. Hicks, D. and Katz, J. S. 1997. 'The British Industrial Research System', SPRU Working Paper, Brighton, University of Sussex
19. Irvine, J. and Martin, B. 1984. Foresight in Science, Picking the Winners, London, Frances Pinter
20. Jaffe, A. 1989. Real effects of academic research, American Economic Review, vol. 79, 957-70
21. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. 1995. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities, Research Policy, vol. 24, 185-205
22. Kline, S. and Rosenberg, N. 1986. An overview of innovation, in Rosenberg, N. (ed.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, D. C., National Academy Press
23. Laursen, K. 1996. Horizontal diversification in Danish national system of innovation: the case of pharmaceuticals, Research Policy, vol. 25, 1121-37
24. Laursen, K. 2000. Trade Specialisation, Technology and Growth: Theory and Evidence From Advanced Countries, Cheltenham, UK and Lyme, US, Edward Elgar
25. Laursen, K. and Drejer, I. 1999. Do inter-sectoral linkages matter for international export specialisation? The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 8, 311-30
26. Laursen, K. and Meliciani, V. 2000. The importance of technology-based intersectoral linkages for market share dynamics, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 136, 702-23
27. List, F. 1841/1959. Das Nationale System der Politischen Oekonomie Basel, Kyklos
28. Lundvall, B.- Å. (ed.) 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London, Pinter Publishers
29. Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. 1979. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies, Research Policy, vol. 8, 102-53
30. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S. and Olivastro, D. 1997. The increasing linkage between us technology and public science, Research Policy, vol. 26, 317-30
31. Nelson, R. R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 67, 297-306
32. Nelson, R. R. (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York, Oxford University Press
33. Nelson, R. R. 1994. Economic growth via the coevolution of technology and institutions, in Leydesdorff, L. and Besselaar, P. v. d. (eds), Evolutionary Economics and Chaos Theory: New Directions in Technology Studies, London, Pinter
34. Nelson, R. R. and Rosenberg, N. 1994. American universities and technical advance, Research Policy, vol. 23, 323-48
35. OECD 2001. 'STI Scoreboard', http://www.oecd.org/oecd/pages/home/ displaygeneral/0,3380,EN-document-18-nodirectorate-no-1-17270-18,FF.html, Paris, OECD
36. Pavitt, K. L. R. 2000. Why European Union funding of academic research should be increased: a radical proposal, Science and Public Policy vol. 27, 455-60
37. Pavitt, K. L. R. 2001. Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn), Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 10, 761-79
38. Pianta, M. and Archibugi, D. 1991. Specialization and size of scientific activities: a bibliometric analysis of advanced countries, Scientometrics, vol. 22, 341-58
39. Polanyi, M. 1962. The republic of science: its political and economic theory, Minerva, vol. 1, 54-73
40. Polanyi-Levitt, K. 1990. The Life and Work of Karl Polanyi, Toronto, Black Rose Books Ltd
41. Rosenberg, N. 1976. Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
42. Salter, A. and Martin, B. R. 2001. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review, Research Policy, vol. 30, 509-32
43. Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press
44. Soete, L. L. G. 1981. A general test of the technological gap trade theory, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, vol. 117, 638-66
45. Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press