|
Volumn 365, Issue 9463, 2005, Pages 919-921
|
Placing principle before expediency: The Shipman Inquiry
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COMPETENCE;
EXPERIENCE;
GENERAL PRACTITIONER;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL EXPERT;
MORALITY;
NOTE;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT MONITORING;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SOCIAL ASPECT;
ARTICLE;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
GENERAL PRACTICE;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
SOCIAL CONTROL;
UNITED KINGDOM;
BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS;
FAMILY PRACTICE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
PATIENT ADVOCACY;
PHYSICIANS;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT;
SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL;
|
EID: 15844431382
PISSN: 01406736
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71059-X Document Type: Note |
Times cited : (4)
|
References (12)
|