G.H. Mead: Theorist of the social act

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 19-39

  Gillespie, Alex ^a  

^a Department of Sociology   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Game; Mead; Significant symbol; Social act; Taking the attitude of the other

Indexed keywords

EID: 15844422456     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8308.2005.00262.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. BATESON, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.
2. BENSON, C. (2001). The cultural psychology of self: Place, morality and art in human worlds. London: Routledge.
3. BIESTA, G.J.J., & BURBULES, N.C. (2003). Pragmatism and educational research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
4. BLUMER, H. (1980). Mead and Blumer: The convergent methodological perspectives of social behaviorism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review, 45, (3), 409-419.
5. BLUMER, H., & MORRIONE, T.J. (2004). George Herbert Mead and human conduct. New York: Altamira Press.
6. BURKE, R. (1962). G.H. Mead and the problem of metaphysics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 23, (1), 81-88.
7. BÜHLER, K. (1934/1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language (D. Fraser, Trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8. COELHO, N.B., & FIGUEIREDO, L.C. (2003). Patterns of intersubjectivity in the constitution of subjectivity: Dimensions of otherness. Culture & Psychology, 9, (3), 193-208.
9. COOK, G.A. (1993). George Herbert Mead: The making of a social pragmatist. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
10. DE WAAL, C. (2002). On Mead. Belmont: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning Inc.
11. DESCARTES, R. (1664/1985). Treatise on man. InJ. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch (Eds.), The philosophical writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99-108.
12. DEWEY, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, (July), 357-370.
13. DODDS, A.E., LAWRENCE, J.A., & VALSINER, J. (1997). The personal and the social: Mead's theory of the "generalized other". Theory & Psychology, 7, (4), 483-503.
14. DUVEEN, G. (2001). Representations, identities, resistance. In K. Deaux & G. Philogene (Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical traditions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, pp. 257-270.
15. ENGESTRÖM, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsulat.
16. ENOESTRÖM, Y., BROWN, K., CHRISTOPHER, L.C., & GREGORY, J. (1997). Coordination, cooperation and communication in the courts: Expansive transitions in legal work. In M. Cole, Y. Engeström & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture and activity: Seminal papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 369-385.
17. FARR, R.M. (1996). The roots of modem social psychology: 1874-1954. Oxford: Blackwell.
18. FARR, R.M. (1997). The significance of the skin as a natural boundary in the sub-division of psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, (2-3), 305-323.
19. FARR, R.M., & ANDERSON, T. (1983). Beyond actor/observer differences in perspective: Extensions and applications. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory: Social and functional extensions. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 45-64.
20. FARR, R., & ROMMETVEIT, R. (1995). The communicative act: An epilogue to mutualities in dialogue. In I. Markova & C.F. Graumann & K. Foppa (Eds.), Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 264-274.
21. FREIRE, P. (1973). Education: The practice of freedom. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative.
22. GERGEN, K.J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage Publications.
23. GILLESPIE, A. (2004). The mystery of G.H. Mead's first book. Theory & Psychology, 14, (3), 423-425.
24. GLASSMAN, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30, (4), 3-14.
25. GRANT, C.B. (2004). Complex communication and the self at the edge. Theory & Psychology, 14, (2), 221-238.
26. GREDLER, M., & SHIELDS, C. (2004). Does no one read Vygotsky's words? Commentary on Glassman. Educational Researcher, 33, (2), 21-25.
27. ICHHEISER, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 55 (suppl.), 1-72.
28. JAMES, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
29. JOAS, H. (1980/1997). G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought (R. Meyer, Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
30. JONES, E.E., & NISBETT, R.E. (1972). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press, pp. 79-94.
31. KOHLER, E., KEYSERS, C., UMILTÀ, M.A., FOGASSI, L., GALLESE, V., & RIZZOLATTI, G. (2002). Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science, 297, (5582), 846-848.
32. LEWIS, J.D. (1979). A Social Behaviorist Interpretation of the Meadian "I". American Journal of Sociology, 84, 261-287.
33. MARKOVÁ, I. (1982). Paradigms, thought and language, Chichester: Wiley.
34. MARKOVÁ, I. (2003). Constitution of the self: intersubjectivity and dialogicality. Culture & Psychology, 9, (3), 249-260.
35. MCPHAIL, C., & REXROAT, C. (1979). Mead vs. Blumer: The divergent methodological perspectives of social behaviourism and symbolic interactionism. American Sociological Review, 44, (3), 449-467.
36. MEAD, G.H. (1903). The definition of the psychical. Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, 1, (3), 77-112.
37. MEAD, G.H. (1910/2001). Essays in social psychology (Edited by M.J. Deegan). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
38. MEAD, G.H. (1910a). Social consciousness and the consciousness of meaning. Psychological Bulletin, 6, (12), 401-408.
39. MEAD, G.H. (1910b). What social objects must psychology presuppose? Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 7, (7), 174-180.
40. MEAD, G.H. (1912). The mechanism of social consciousness. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 9, (15), 401-406.
41. MEAD, G.H. (1913). The social self. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 10, (14), 374-380.
42. MEAD, G.H. (1922). A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. Journal of Philosophy, 19, (6), 157-163.
43. MEAD, G.H. (1925). The genesis of self and social control. International Journal of Ethics, 35, (3), 251-277.
44. MEAD, G.H. (1926). The nature of aesthetic experience. International Journal of Ethics, 36, (4), 382-393.
45. MEAD, G.H. (1932). The philosophy of the present (Edited by A.E. Murphy). La Salle, Illinois: Open Court Publishing Company.
46. MEAD, G.H. (1934). Mind, self & society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Edited by C.W. Morris). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. MEAD, G.H. (1936). Movements of thought in the nineteenth century (Edited by M.H. Moore). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48. MEAD, G.H. (1938). The philosophy of the act (Edited by C.W. Morris with J.M. Brewster, A.M. Dunham and D. Miller). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. MORRIS, C.W. (1927). The concept of the symbol, II. The Journal of Philosophy, 24, (11), 281-291.
50. MORRIS, C.W. (1946). Signs, language and behavior. New York: George Braziller Inc.
51. NATANSON, M. (1956). Phenomenology from the natural standpoint: A reply to Van Meter Ames. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 17, (2), 241-245.
52. NIETZSCHE, F. (1874/1997). Untimely meditations (Edited by D. Breazeale) (R.J. Hollingdale, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. ORBACH, H. (2004). The formation and development of the thought of G.H. Mead (1863-1931). Paper presented at the Sorbonne, Paris, 19 June 2004.
54. PEIRCE, C.S. (1998). Charles S. Peirce: The essential writings (Edited by E.G. Moore). New York: Prometheus Books.
55. RIZZOLATTI, G., & ARBIB, A.M. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, (5), 188-194.
56. SAUSSURE, E (1916/1983). Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd.
57. SHIBUTANI, T. (1961). Society and personality: An interactionist approach to social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
58. SMITH, A. (1759/1982). The theory of moral sentiments (Edited by D.D. Raphael & A.L. Macfie). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
59. TOLMAN, C.W., & PIEKKOLA, B. (1989). John Dewey and dialectical materialism: Anticipations of activity theory in the critique of the reflex arc concept. Activity Theory, 1, (3-4), 43-46.
60. VALSINER, J. (2003). Editorial introduction: Beyond intersubjectivity. Culture & Psychology, 9, (3), 187-192.
61. VALSINER, J., & VAN DER VEER, R. (1988). On the social nature of cognition: An analysis of the shared intellectual roots of George Herbert Mead and Lev Vygotsky. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 18, (1), 117-136.
62. VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman). London: Harvard University Press.
63. WERTSCH, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. ZITTOUN, T., DUVEEN, G., GILLESPIE, A., IVINSON, G., & PSALTIS, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9, (4), 415-448.