Situated objectivity

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 99-120

  Williams, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15844366375     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8308.2005.00265.x     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. AYER, A. (1987). "Introduction" in The Logic of the Social Sciences J.S. Mill, London; Duckworth.
2. BABBIE, E. (1995). The Practice of Social Research. 7th edition. Belmont, Cal.; Wadsworth.
3. BARNES, B., & BLOOR, D. (1982). Relativism, Rationalism and the Sociology of Knowledge' in Hollis, M & Lukes, S. Rationality and Relativism. 21-47 Oxford: Blackwell.
4. BECKER, H. (1967). "Whose Side Are We On?" Social Problems 14, (3), 239-47.
5. BECKER, H. (1974). "Reply to Riley's 'Partisanship and Objectivity'" in Riley, G. (ed.) Values, Objectivity and the Social Sciences. Reading, Mas.; Adison Wesley.
6. BURT, M. (1999). "US Homelessness Research During the 1980s and Early 1990s: Approaches, Lessons Learned, and Methodological Options" in Avramov, D. Coping with Homelessness: Issues to be Tackled and Best Practices in Europe. Aldershot; Ashgate.
7. BYRNE, D. (2002). Interpreting Quantitative Data. London; Sage.
8. CARNAP, R. (1991 [1963]). The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap Ed. P. Schilpp. La Sall Ill. Open Court.
9. CHALMERS, A. (1990). Science and its Fabrication. Buckingham; Open University Press.
10. CHAMBERLAIN, C. (1996). Counting the Homeless; Implications for Policy Development. Canberra; Australian Bureau of Statistics.
11. DAVID, M. (2002). "Problems of participation: the limits of action research" International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5, (1), 11-19.
12. DEVINE, F., & HEATH, S. (1999). Sociological Research Methods in Context. London; Macmillan.
13. Fox, N. (2003). "Practice Based Evidence: Towards Collaborative and Transgressive Research" Sociology 37, (1), 81-102.
14. GOULDNER, A. (1968). "The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State" American Sociologist 3, (2), 103-116.
15. GOULDNER, A. (1973). For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Harmondsworth; Penguin (essay originally published as "Anti-minotaur: The myth of a value free sociology" Social Problems 9: 199-213.
16. GOULDNER, A. (1973). For Sociology: Renewal and Critique in Sociology Today. Harmondsworth; Penguin (essay originally published as "Anti-minotaur: The myth of a value free sociology" Social Problems 9: 199-213.
17. HACKING, I. (1983). Representing and Intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
18. HACKING, J. (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
19. HAMMERSLEY, M. (1989). The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago School. London; Routledge.
20. HAMMERSLEY, M. (2000). Taking Sides in Social Research: Essays in Partisanship and Bias. London; Routledge.
21. HARDING, S. (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes; Open University Press.
22. HOROWITZ, I. (1967). The Rise and Fall of Project Camelot. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press.
23. LAKATOS, I., & MUSGRAVE, A. (Eds.). (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
24. LAUDAN, L. (1984). Science and Values. Berkeley Cal. University of California Press.
25. LINCOLN, Y. (1994). "Tracks toward a postmodern politics of evaluation" Evaluation Practice 15 (3) 299-309.
26. LIPTON, P. (1991). Inference to the best Explanation. London; Routledge.
27. LACEY, L. (1999). Is Science Value Free? Values and Scientific Understanding. London: Routledge.
28. LONGINO, H. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Enquiry. Princeton NJ; Princeton University Press.
29. LONGINO, H. (2002). The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton NJ; Princeton University Press.
30. MADGE, J. (1963). The Origins of Scientific Sociology. London; Tavistock.
31. MANNHEIM, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. New York; Harcourt Brace.
32. MELLOR, D. (1971). The Matter of Chance. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
33. MUKHERJI, P. (2000). "Methodology in Social Research: Dilemmas and Perspectives" in MUKHERJI, P. (Ed.). Methodology in Social Research: Essays in Honour of Ramkrishna Mukherjee. New Delhi; Sage.
34. OAKLEY, A. (2000). Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences, Cambridge; Polity.
35. PAYNE, J. (2002). "An Action Research Project in a Night Shelter for Rough Sleepers" Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 9: 95-101.
36. POPPER, K. (1979). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
37. POPPER, K. (1986). Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. London; Fontana.
38. RILEY, G. (1974)."Partisanship and Objectivity in the Social Sciences" in RILEY, G. (Ed.) Values, Objectivity and the Social Sciences. Reading, Mas.; Adison Wesley.
39. ROSENAU, P. (1992). Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads and Intrusions. Princeton; Princeton University Press.
40. SHAW, I., BLOOR, M., CORMACK, R. & WILLIAMSON, H. (1996). "Estimating the Prevalence of Hard-to-Reach Populations: The Illustration of Mark-Recapture Methods in the Study of Homelessness" Social Polity and Administration, 30, (1), 69-85.
41. SARANTAKOS, S. (2005). Social Research 3rd Edition. Basingstoke; Macmillan.
42. SAUNDERS, E (1990). A Nation of Home Owners. London; Unwin Hyman.
43. WEBER, M. (1974). "'Objectivity' in social science and social policy" in G. Riley (Ed.) Values, Objectivity and the Social Sciences. Reading, Mass.; Adison-Wesley.
44. WILLIAMS, M. (2000). Science and Social Science: an introduction. London; Routledge.
45. WILLIAMS, M. (2001). "Complexity and Causation: Implications for Homelessness Research. Journal for Social Issues 2 http://whb.co.uk/ socialissues/mw.htm
46. WILLIAMS, M., & CHEAL, B. (2001). "Is There Any Such Thing as Homelessness? Measurement, Explanation and Process in 'Homelessness' Research" European Journal of Social Research: Innovation 14, (3), 239-253.
47. WILLIAMS, M. (2005-in press). "Definition, Measurement and Legitimacy in Studies of Homelessness" in ROMERO, M. & MARGOLIS, E. Social Inequalities (Blackwell Companion to Sociology Series) Malden, Mass.; Blackwell.
48. WOLPERT, L. (1992). The Unnatural Nature of Science. London; Faber.