Impact of employee, management, and process issues on constructability implementation

Construction Management and Economics

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 711-720

  Eldin, Neil N ^a  

^a Oregon State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Constructability; Project delivery time; Project management; Schedule compression; Schedule reduction tools; Time to market; Value engineering

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; VALUE ENGINEERING;

CONSTRUCTABILITY; PROJECT DELIVERY; SCHEDULE COMPRESSION; SCHEDULE REDUCTION; TIME TO MARKET;

PERSONNEL;

EID: 15844364868     PISSN: 01446193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/014461999371051     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Eldin, N.N. (1988) Constructability improvement of project design, ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(4), 631-40.
2. Eldin, N.N. (1996) An Investigation of Schedule Reduction Tools for The Engineering and Construction Industry, Research Report 41-11, Construction Industry Institute.
3. Gehrig, Brinegar, Thompson, and Weiland, Concepts and Methods of Schedule Compression, CII-Doc.55, Construction Industry Institute.
4. O'Connor, J. and Miller, (1993) Constructability: Program Assessment and Barriers to Implementation, CII-Doc.85, Construction Industry Institute.
5. O'Connor, J. and Davis, V. (1988) Constructability improvement during field operations, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 114(4), 548-64.
6. Russell, J., Radtke, M. and Gugel, J. (1992a) Project-Level Model and Approaches to Implement Constructability, CII-Doc.82, Construction Industry Institute.
7. Russell, J., Radtke, M., and Gugel, J. (1992) Benefits and Costs of Constructability: Four Case Studies, CII-Doc.83, October 1992.
8. The Construction Industry Institute (1986) Constructability (A Primer), Publication 3-1, University of Texas, Austin, TX.