Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: Part III. Effluent toxicity tests

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 174-183

  Dwyer, F J ^a   Hardesty, D K ^b   Henke, C E ^b   Ingersoll, C G ^b   Whites, D W ^b   Augspurger, T ^c   Canfield, T J ^d   Mount, D R ^d   Mayer, F L ^d  

^a US Fish & Wildlife Service   (United States)

^b Jackson Field Research Station   (United States)

^c US Fish and Wildlife Service   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

4 NONYLPHENOL; AMMONIA; CARBARIL; CHLORINE; COPPER; DIMPYLATE; PENTACHLOROPHENOL; PERMETHRIN;

EFFLUENT; ENDANGERED SPECIES; FISH; TOXICITY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EFFLUENT STANDARD; EFFLUENT TOXICITY; ENDANGERED SPECIES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISH; GOVERNMENT; GROWTH; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; LARVA; MULTIPLE CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCTION; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME; TOXICITY TESTING; UNITED STATES; WATER CONTAMINATION; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METHODOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE; SURVIVAL; WATER POLLUTANT;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; FISHES; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; LARVA; REPRODUCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY TESTS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS;

EID: 15744399111     PISSN: 00904341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00244-004-0104-2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. ASTM 2003 Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests on test materials with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians (E729-96 [2002]) In: Annual book of ASTM standards. Volume 11.05 American Society for Testing and Materials West Conshohocken, PA 179 200
2. RB Baird R Berger J Gully 1996 Improvements in point estimation methods and application to controlling aquatic toxicity test reliability D Grothe K Dickson Reed-Judkins Whole effluent toxicity testing: An evaluation of methods and prediction of receiving system impacts SETAC Press Pensacola, FL 103 130
3. Besser JM, Wang N, Ingersoll CG, Dwyer FJ, Mayer FL (2004) Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: 2. Chronic toxicity of copper and pentachlorophenol. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol (in press)
4. DL Denton TJ Norberg-King 1996 Whole effluent toxicity statistics: A regulatory perspective D Grothe K Dickson Reed-Judkins Whole effluent toxicity testing: An evaluation of methods and prediction of receiving system impacts SETAC Press Pensacola, FL 83 102
5. FJ Dwyer LC Sappington DR Buckler SB Jones 1995 Use of surrogate species in assessing contaminant risk to endangered and threatened fishes (EPA/600/R-96/029) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC
6. FJ Dwyer DK Hardesty CE Henke CG Ingersoll DW Whites DR Mount 1999a Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened species: Toxicant classes (EPA/600/R-99/098) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC
7. FJ Dwyer DK Hardesty CE Henke CG Ingersoll DW Whites DW Mount 1999b Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened species: Effluent toxicity tests (EPA/600/R-99/099). U.S Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC
8. FJ Dwyer DK Hardesty CG Ingersoll DW Whites 1999c Assessing contaminant sensitivity of Cape Fear shiner and spotfin chub. Interim Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Raleigh, NC
9. Dwyer FJ, Hardesty DK, Ingersoll CG, Kunz JL, Whites DW (2000a) Assessing contaminant sensitivity of American shad, Atlantic sturgeon, and shortnose sturgeon. Report to New York Department of Environmental Conservation. United States Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, MO
10. Dwyer FJ, Canfield TJ, Ingersoll CG, Hardesty DK, Whites DW (2000b) Assessing contaminant sensitivity of bonytail chub (Gila elegans), razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and Gila topminnow (Poeciliopsis occidentalis). Report to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX, San Francisco, CA
11. Dwyer FJ, Mayer FL, Sappington LC, Buckler DR, Bridges CM, Greer IE, et al. (2004) Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: 1. Acute toxicity of five chemicals. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol (in press)
12. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 1992a Preliminary study of the contrast of sensitivity between Pimephales promelas and Etheostoma fonticola to San Marcos wastewater treatment plant effluent (4/6/92-/4/13/92) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
13. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 1992b Preliminary study of the contrast of sensitivity between Pimephales promelas and Etheostoma fonticola to Rodeo herbicide (11/11/92-11/18/92) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
14. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 1999a Comparison of EPA target toxicity aquatic test organisms to the fountain darter: 7 day chronic toxicity test using cadmium chloride (11/12/99 - 11/20/99) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
15. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 1992b Comparison of EPA target toxicity aquatic test organisms to the fountain darter: 7 day chronic toxicity test using cadmium chloride (12/3/99 - 12/11/99) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
16. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 2000a Comparison of EPA target toxicity aquatic test organisms to the fountain darter: 7 day chronic toxicity test using cadmium chloride (1/28/00 - 2/5/00) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
17. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 2000b Comparison of EPA target toxicity aquatic test organisms to the fountain darter: 7 day chronic toxicity test using cadmium chloride (2/4/00 - 2/12/00) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
18. Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center 2000c Comparison of EPA target toxicity aquatic test organisms to the fountain darter: 7 day chronic toxicity test using cadmium chloride (2/27/00 - 3/6/00) Southwest Texas State University San Marcos, TX
19. Mayer FL Jr, Ellersieck MR (1986) Manual of acute toxicity: Interpretation and data base for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater animals (resource publ. No. 160). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
20. Neuderfer GN, Heitzman DL (1992) Effects of total residual chlorine from municipal wastewater treatment plants on freshwater aquatic life (technical report no. 92-1). Division of Fish and Wildlife, Division of Water, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21. TJ Norberg-King 1993 A linear interpolation method for sublethal toxicity: The inhibition concentration (Icp) approach (technical report no. 03-93) National Effluent Toxicity Assessment Center Duluth, MN
22. FF Jr Snelson 1971 Notropis mekistocholas, a new herbivorous cyprinid fish endemic to the Cape Fear river basin, North Carolina Copeia 1971 449 462
23. LC Sappington FL Mayer FJ Dwyer DR Buckler JR Jones MR Ellersieck 2001 Contaminant sensitivity of threatened and endangered fishes compared to standard surrogate species Envir Toxicol Chem 20 2869 2876
24. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1994 Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms (EPA 600/4-91-002) U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory Cincinnati, OH
25. CO Yoder 1989 The development and use of biological criteria for Ohio surface waters: In Water Quality Standards for the 21st Century Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Washington, DC Proceedings of a National Conference. U.S.