Effectiveness of supplemental stockings for the endangered Key Largo woodrat

Biological Conservation

Volumn 124, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 27-33

  McCleery, Robert A ^a   Lopez, Roel R ^a   Silvy, Nova J ^a   Grant, William E ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Endangered species; Key Largo woodrat; Population viability analyses; Relocations; Supplementation

Indexed keywords

POPULATION MODELING; POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSIS; RODENT; SPECIES CONSERVATION; STOCK ENHANCEMENT;

NEOTOMA FLORIDANA SMALLI;

EID: 15744391761     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. H.R. Akcakaya A method for simulating demographic stochasticity Ecological Modelling 54 1991 133 136
2. Akcakaya, H.R., 1998. RAMAS GIS: linking landscape data with population viability analysis (Version 3.0). Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York
3. H.R. Akcakaya Considering threats to the viability of small populations using individual based models Ecological Bulletins 48 2000 39 51
4. Akçakaya, H.R., Root, W., 2002. RAMAS Metapop: Viability Analysis for Stage-structured Metapopulations (Version 4.0). Applied Biomathematics, Setauket, New York
5. H.R. Akcakaya, and P. Sjogren-Gulve Population viability analyses in conservation planning: An overview Ecological Bulletins 48 2000 9 21
6. D.B. Barbour, and S.R. Humphrey Status and habitat of Key Largo woodrat and cotton mouse (Neotoma floridana smalli and Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola) Journal of Mammalogy 63 1982 144 148
7. J.M. Black, A.P. Marshall, A. Gilburn, N. Santos, H. Hoshide, J. Mello, C.N. Hodegs, and L. Katathira Survival, movements, and breeding of released Hawaiian gesse: an assessment of the reintroduction program Journal of Wildlife Management 61 1997 1161 1173
8. B.W. Brook, J.J. O'Grady, A.P. Chapman, M.A. Burgman, H.R. Akçakaya, and R. Frankham Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology Nature 404 2000 385 387
9. M.A. Burgman, S. Ferson, and H.R. Akcakaya Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology 1993 Chapman and Hall London
10. Dean, T., 2003. Captive propagation and reintroduction plan for the Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli). US Fish and Wildlife Service, Vero Beach, FL, USA
11. S.M. Durant, and G.M. Mace Species differences and population structure in population viability analysis P.J.S. Olney G.M. Mace A.T.S. Feister Creative Conservation 1994 Chapman and Hall London, UK 67 89
12. J. Fischer, and D.B. Lindenmayer An assessment of the published results of animal relocations Biological Conservation 96 2000 1 11
13. Frank, P., Percival, F., Keith, B., 1997. A status survey for Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) and Key Largo cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus allapaticola) on North Key Largo, Monroe County, Florida. Unpublished report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, Jacksonville, FL, USA
14. L.R. Ginzburg, S. Ferson, and H.R. Akcakaya Reconstructibility of density dependence and conservative assessment of extinction risk Conservation Biology 4 1990 63 70
15. B. Griffith, J.M. Scott, J.W. Carpenter, and C. Reed Translocation as a species conservation tool: Status and Strategy Science 245 1989 477 480
16. S.L. Hersh Ecology of the Key Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana smalli) Journal of Mammalogy 62 1981 201 206
17. S.R. Humphrey Key Largo woodrat S.R. Humphrey Rare and Endangered Biota of Florida vol. 2 1992 University of Florida Press Gainesville, Florida, USA 119 130
18. D.G. Kleiman, B.B. Beck, J.M. Deitz, and L.A. Dietz Costs of a re-introduction and criteria for success: accounting and accountability in the golden tamarin conservation program J.H.W. Gipps Beyond Captive Breeding, Reintroducing Endangered Mammals to the Wild Symposia of the Zoological Society of London vol. 62 1991 Clarendon Press Oxford, UK 125 137
19. C.J. Krebs Ecological Methodology second ed. 1999 Benjamin/Cummings Menlo Park, CA, USA
20. R.C. Lacy Considering threats to the viability of small populations using individual based models Ecological Bulletins 48 2000 39 51
21. McCleery, R.A., 2003. Aspects of Key Largo woodrat ecology. Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
22. D.E. Pearson, and L.F. Ruggiero Transect versus grid trapping arrangements for sampling small-mammal communities Wildlife Society Bulletin 31 2003 454 459
23. M.R. Price Review of mammal re-introductions and the role of the re-introduction specialist group of IUCN/SSC J.H.W. Gipps Beyond Captive Breeding, Reintroducing Endangered Mammals to the Wild Symposia of the Zoological Society of London vol. 62 1991 Clarendon Press Oxford, UK 9 25
24. D.G. Rainey Eastern Woodrat, Neotoma floridana: Life History and Ecology 1956 Museum of Natural History, University of Kansas Publications Lawrence, Kansas
25. Sasso, C.R., 1999. Population dynamics, microhabitat use, and competition in small mammal community of Key Largo. Dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
26. U.S. Seal Life after extinction J.H.W. Gipps Beyond Captive Breeding, Reintroducing Endangered Mammals to the Wild Symposia of the Zoological Society of London vol. 62 1991 Clarendon Press Oxford, UK 39 53
27. R. Southgate, and H. Possingham Modeling the reintroduction of the greater bilby Macrotis lagotis using the metapopulation model analysis of the likelihood of extinction Biological Conservation 73 1995 151 160
28. A.M. Strong, and G.T. Bancroft Patterns of deforestation and fragmentation of mangrove and deciduous seasonal forests in upper Florida Keys Bulletin of Marine Science 54 1994 795 804
29. US Department of the Interior, 1973. Threatened wildlife of the United States, Resource Publication 114. Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Washington, DC, USA
30. US Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Multi-species recovery plan for the threatened and endangered species of South Florida, vol. 1. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Vero Beach, FL, USA
31. J.L. Van Zant, and M.C. Wooten Translocation of the Choctawhatchee beachmice (Peromyscus poliontus allophrys): hard lessons learned Biological Conservation 112 2002 405 413