Options for handling missing data in the Health Utilities Index Mark 3

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 186-198

  Naeim, Arash ^a,c   Keeler, Emmett B ^b   Mangione, Carol M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c Box 951687 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Health utilities index; Imputation; Missing data; Non response; Pattern analysis

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CATARACT; DATA ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX MARK 3; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MOBILIZATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; VISION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ALGORITHMS; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 15744384861     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X05275153     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Paltiel AD, Fuhlbrigge AL, Kitch BT, et al. Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: results from the asthma policy model. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(1):39-49.
2. Goldie SJ, Kuhn L, Denny L, Pollack A, Wright TC. Policy analysis of cervical cancer screening strategies in low-resource settings: clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness. JAMA. 2001;285(24):3107-15.
3. Zimmerman RK, Jackson RE. Vaccine policy decisions: tension between science, cost-effectiveness and consensus? Am Fam Phys. 2001;63(10):1919, 1923.
4. Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Wu AW, et al. Health values of hospitalized patients 80 years or older. HELP Investigators. Hospitalized Elderly Longitudinal Project. JAMA. 1998;279(5):371-5.
5. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl II):138-50.
6. Brazier JE, Walters SJ, Nicholl JP, Kohler B. Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(2):195-204.
7. Coast J, Peters TJ, Richards SH, Gunnell DJ. Use of the EuroQoL among elderly acute care patients. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(1):1-10.
8. HUInc. Health Utilities Index: an overview. Available from: http://www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/hug/
9. Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Furlong WJ. Health Utilities Index. In: Spilker B, ed. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. p 239-52.
10. Grootendorst P, Feeny D, Furlong W. Health Utilities Index Mark 3: evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Med Care. 2000;38(3):290-9.
11. Rubin DB, Stern HS, Vehovar V. Handling "don't know" survey responses: the case of the Slovenian plebiscite. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90(431):822-8.
12. Rubin DB. Multiple Imputation for Non-response in Surveys. New York: John Wiley; 1987.
13. Little R, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2002.
14. Figueredo AJ, McKnight PE, McKnight KM, Sidani S. Multivariate modeling of missing data within and across assessment waves. Addiction. 2000;95(Suppl 3):S361-80.
15. Belin TR, Diffendal GJ, Mack S, Rubin DB, Schafer JL, Zaslavsky AM. Hierarchical logistic regression models for imputation of unresolved enumeration status in undercount estimation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88(423):1149-66.
16. Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some applications. Stat Med. 1991;10(4):585-98.
17. Schafer JL. Multiple imputation: a primer. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(1):3-15.
18. Dempster AP, Rubin DB. Introduction. In: Madow G, Olkin I, & Rubin D, eds. Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys: Volume 2. New York: Academic Press; 1983. p 3-10.
19. Schafer JL, Graham JW Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(2):147-77.
20. Oshungade IO. Some methods of handling item non-response in categorical data. The Statistician. 1989;38(4):281-96.
21. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW. Algorithm for Determining HUI Mark 2 (HUI2)/Mark 3 (HUI3) Health Status Classification Levels, Health States, Health-Related Quality of Life Utility Scores and Single Attribute Level Utility Scores from HUI23S1.40Q Health Status Questionnaire. Ontario: Health Utilities; 1999.
22. Mangione CM, Orav EJ, Lawrence MG, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, Goldman L. Prediction of visual function after cataract surgery. A prospectively validated model. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113(10):1305-11.
23. Naeim A, Keeler E, Mangione C. Cost effectiveness of cataract surgery in marginal patients (abstract). J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:S9.
24. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Seddon JM, et al. Development of the 'Activities of Daily Vision Scale'. A measure of visual functional status. Med Care. 1992;30(12):1111-26.
25. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34(3):220-33.
26. Belin TR, Hu MY, Young AS, Grusky O. Performance of a general location model with an ignorable missing-data assumption in a multivariate mental health services study. Stat Med. 1999;18(22): 3123-35.