Electrocardiographic-gated multislice computed tomography for visualization of cardiac morphology in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 234-237

  Lembcke, Alexander ^a,b,c   Koch, Christina ^a   Dohmen, Pascal M ^a   Rutsch, Wolfgang ^a   Abbara, Suhny ^b   Krug, Lasse D ^a   Muehler, Matthias R ^a   Rogalla, Patrik ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac surgery; Congenital heart defects; Imaging; Multislice computed tomography; Transposition of great vessels

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

AORTIC ROOT; AORTIC-PULMONARY; ATYPICALS; CARDIAC CHAMBERS; CARDIAC-SURGERY; CONGENITAL HEART DEFECTS; MORPHO-LOGICS; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TRANSPOSITION OF GREAT VESSEL; TRANSPOSITION OF THE GREAT ARTERIES;

HEART;

ADULT; AORTA ROOT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGENITALLY CORRECTED TRANSPOSITION OF GREAT ARTERIES; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; GATED IMAGING; GREAT VESSELS TRANSPOSITION; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LUNG ARTERY; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MORPHOLOGY; MULTISLICE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 15744369795     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rct.0000156198.02741.c0     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Schwab JO, Ehlgen A, Sommer T. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in a 70-year old women diagnosed using single-detector helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:598-599.
2. Baron RL, Gutierrez FR, Sagel SS, et al. CT of anomalies of the mediastinal vessels. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1981;137:571-576.
3. Farmer DW, Lipton MJ, Webb WR, et al. Computed tomography in congenital heart disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984;8:677-687.
4. Chiu IS, Wu SJ, Chen SJ, et al. Sequential diagnosis of coronary arterial anatomy in congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:422-429.
5. Connelly MS, Liu PP, Williams WG, et al. Congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries in the adult: functional status and complications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:1238-1243.
6. Friedberg DZ, Nadas AS. Clinical profile of patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. A study of 60 cases. N Engl J Med. 1970;282:1053-1059.
7. Lundstrom U, Bull C, Wyse RKH, et al. The natural and "unnatural" history of congenitally corrected transposition. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:1222-1229.
8. Huhta JC, Maloney JD, Ritter DG, et al. Complete atrioventricular block in patients with atrio-ventricular discordance. Circulation. 1983;67:1374-1377.
9. Anderson RH, Arnold R, Wilkinson JL. The conducting system in congenitally corrected transposition. Lancet. 1973;1:1286-1288.
10. Bharati S, McCue CM, Tingelstad JB, et al. Lack of connection between the atria and the peripheral conduction system in a case of corrected transposition with congenital atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol. 1978;42:147-153.
11. Hartnell GG, Notarianni M. MRI and echocardiography: how do they compare in adults? Semin Roentgenol. 1998;33:252-261.
12. Didier D, Ratib O, Beghetti M, et al. Morphologic and functional evaluation of congenital heart disease by magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:639-655.
13. Park JH, Han MC, Kim CW. MR imaging of congenitally corrected transposition of the great vessels in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:491-494.