A 3-dimensional analysis of molar movement during headgear treatment

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 18-29

  Ashmore, Jennifer L ^a   Kurland, Brenda F ^a   King, Gregory J ^a   Wheeler, Timothy T ^b   Ghafari, Joseph ^c   Ramsay, Douglas S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MOLAR TOOTH; MORPHOMETRICS; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL CARE; FEMALE; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DENTAL MODELS; EXTRAORAL TRACTION APPLIANCES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MAXILLA; MOLAR; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOOTH MOVEMENT;

EID: 15744368203     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.120687     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. O'Connor BM. Contemporary trends in orthodontic practice: a national survey. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:163-70.
2. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
3. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:391-400.
4. Ghafari J, King GJ, Tulloch JF. Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:107-17.
5. Baumrind S. Some comments on clinical studies in orthodontics and their applications to orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1999;5:96-109.
6. Baumrind S. The decision to extract: preliminary findings from a prospective clinical trial. In: Trotman CA, McNamara JA Jr, editors. Orthodontic treatment: outcome and effectiveness. Volume 30. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1995. p. 43-80.
7. Baumrind S. Clinical studies in orthodontics: an overview of NIDR-sponsored clinical orthodontic studies in the US. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:80-7.
8. Ghafari JG. Emerging paradigms in orthodontics - an essay. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:573-80.
9. Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:533-42.
10. Bjork A. The use of metallic implants in the study of facial growth in children: method and application. Am J Phys Anthropol 1968;29:243-54.
11. Johnston LE. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA, editors. Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics, Volume 19. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1986. p. 103-48.
12. Ghafari J, Baumrind S, Efstratiadis SS. Misinterpreting growth and treatment outcome from serial cephalographs. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:102-6.
13. Jones ML. A comparison of orthodontic treatment changes as measured from study casts and cephalometric radiographs. Br J Orthod 1991;18:99-103.
14. Richmond S. Recording the dental cast in three dimensions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:199-206.
15. Kirjavainen M, Kirjavainen T, Haavikko K. Changes in dental arch dimensions by use of an orthopedic cervical headgear in Class II correction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111: 59-66.
16. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 1995;65:43-8.
17. Takada K, Lowe AA, DeCou R. Operational performance of the Reflex Metrograph and its applicability to the three-dimensional analysis of dental casts. Am J Orthod 1983;83:195-9.
18. Bhatia SN, Harrison VE. Operational performance of the travelling microscope in the measurement of dental casts. Br J Orthod 1987;14:147-53.
19. Alcaniz M, Grau V, Monserrat C, Juan C, Albalat S. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing. Stud Health Technol Inform 1999;62:8-14.
20. Okumura H, Chen LH, Tsutsumi S, Oka M. Three-dimensional virtual imaging of facial skeleton and dental morphologic condition for treatment planning in orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:126-31.
21. van der Linden FP. Changes in the position of posterior teeth in relation to ruga points. Am J Orthod 1978;74:142-61.
22. Lebret L. Growth changes of the palate. J Dent Res 1962;41:1391-404.
23. Peavy DC Jr, Kendrick GS. The effects of tooth movement on the palatine rugae. J Prosthet Dent 1967;18:536-42.
24. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:718-26.
25. Lysell L. Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisiva in man: a morphologic and genetic study. Acta Odont Scand 1955;13(supp 18):5-137.
26. Bailey LT, Esmailnejad A, Almeida MA. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts in extraction and nonextraction cases. Angle Orthod 1996;66:73-8.
27. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51-61.
28. Keeling SD, King GJ, Wheeler TT, McGorray S. Timing of Class II treatment: rationale, methods and early results of an ongoing randomized clinical trial. In: Trotman CA, McNamara JA Jr, editors. Orthodontic treatment: outcome and effectiveness. Volume 30. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1995. p. 81-112.
29. Rohlf FJ. Rotational fit (Procrustes) methods. In: Rohlf FJ, Bookstein F, editors. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Museum of Zoology; 1990. p. 227-36.
30. Eberly DH. 3D game engine design: a practical approach to real-time computer graphics. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 2000.
31. Lele S. Some comments on coordinate-free and scale-invariant methods in morphometrics. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991;85:407-17.
32. Lele S, Richtsmeier JT. Euclidean distance matrix analysis: a coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991;86:415-27.
33. Richtsmeier JT, Cole TM III, Krovitz G, Valeri CJ, Lele S. Pre-operative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1998;18:64-78.
34. Ucem TT, Yuksel S. Effects of different vectors of forces applied by combined headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:316-23.
35. Lyons EK, Ramsay DS. A self-regulation model of patient compliance in orthodontics: implications for the design of a headgear monitor. Semin Orthod 2000;6:224-30.
36. Ramsay DS, Soma M, Sarason IG. Enhancing patient adherence: the role of technology and its application to orthodontics. In: McNamara JA Jr, Trotman CA, editors. Creating the compliant patient, Volume 33. Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development: University of Michigan; 1997. p. 141-65.
37. Bar-Zion Y, Ferrer D, Johnson PD, Gibbs CH, Taylor M, McGorray SP, et al. New method to reproducibly examine and quantify spatial orientation of teeth with relation to a fixed structure on orthodontic study models. J Dent Res 1998;77:253 (abstract #1178).
38. McDonald JL, Shofer FS, Ghafari J. Effect of molar rotation on arch length. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:79-85.
39. Halazonetis DJ. Acquisition of 3-dimensional shapes from images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:556-60.