An assessment of seismic design practice of steel structures in the United States since the northridge earthquake

Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 409-423

  Sabol, Thomas A ^a,b  

^a Englekirk Sabol Consult E   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INSPECTION; SEISMOLOGY; STANDARDS; STEEL STRUCTURES; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; WATERSHEDS; WELDING ELECTRODES;

DESIGN STANDARDS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC SYSTEM; STEEL MOMENT FRAMES;

EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS;

EID: 15744365019     PISSN: 15417794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tal.282     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 1997. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC: Chicago, IL.
2. AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 1999. Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC: Chicago, IL.
3. AISC (American Institute of Steel Construction). 2002. Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC: Chicago, IL.
4. Chi B, Uang CM. 2002. Cyclic response and design recommendations of reduced beam section moment connections with deep columns. Journal of Structural Engineering 128(4): 464-473.
5. Engelhardt MD, Sabol TA. 1994. Testing of welded steel moment connections in response to the Northridge earthquake. In Northridge Steel Update I. American Institute of Steel Construction: Chicago, IL.
6. Engelhardt MD, Sabol TA. 1998. Reinforcing of steel moment connections with cover plates: benefits and limitations. Engineering Structures 20(4-6): 510-520.
7. Englekirk RE. 1999. Extant panel zone design procedures for steel frames are questioned. Earthquake Spectra 15(2): 361-370.
8. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1995. Interim Guidelines: Evaluation, Repair, Modification and Design of Steel Moment Frames. FEMA 267 (SAC 95-02). FEMA: Washington, DC.
9. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 1997. FEMA 302, NEHRP. Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures, Part I - Provisions. FEMA: Washington, DC.
10. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000a. FEMA 350. Recommended Seismic Design Criteria for New Steel Moment-Frame Buildings. FEMA: Washington, DC.
11. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000b. FEMA 353. Recommended Specifications and Quality Assurance Guidelines for Steel Moment-Frame Construction for Seismic Applications. FEMA: Washington, DC
12. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000c. FEMA-355C. State of the Art Report on Systems Performance of Steel Moment Frames Subject to Earthquake Ground Shaking. Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC.
13. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000d. FEMA-355D. State of the Art Report on Connection Performance. Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC.
14. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2000e. FEMA-355E. State of the Art Report on Past Performance of Steel Moment-Frame Buildings in Earthquakes. Prepared by the SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency: Washington, DC.
15. Goel SC. 1992a. Cyclic post buckling behavior of steel bracing members. In Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures under Cyclic Loading. Y. Fukumoto and G. C. Lee, editors. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 75-104.
16. Goel SC. 1992b. Earthquake resistant design of ductile braced steel structures. In Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures under Cyclic Loading. Y. Fukumoto and G. C. Lee, editors. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL; 297-308.
17. Goel SC, Lee S. 1992. A fracture criterion of concrete-filled tubular bracing members under cyclic loading. Proceedings of the 1992 ASCE Structures Congress. ASCE: Reston, VA; 922-925.
18. ICC (International Code Council). 2002. 2003 International Building Code. ICC: Birmingham, AL.
19. ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials). 1997. Uniform Building Code. ICBO: Whittier, CA.
20. Krawinkler H, Gupta A. 1998. Story drift demands for steel moment frame structures in different seismic regions. In Proceedings of the 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, WA.
21. LADBS (Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety). 2004. Design and Construction Requirements for Steel Moment Frame Connections. Document Number P/BC 2002-098, March 19, 2004.
22. Meng RL, Murray TM. 1997. Seismic performance of bolted end-plate moment connections. In Proceedings of the National Steel Construction Conference. AISC: Chicago, IL.
23. Midorikawa M, Hasegawa T, Mukai A, Nishiyama I, Fukuta T, Yamanouchi H. 1997. Damage investigation of steel buildings in specific areas observed from the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. In Proceedings of US-Japan Workshop on Steel Fracture Issues, San Francisco, CA.
24. Northridge Reconnaissance Team. 1996. Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994. Reconnaissance Report (Suppl. C-2 to Vol. 11). EERI: Oakland, CA.
25. Sabelli R. 2001. EERI/FEMA NEHRP Professional Fellowship Report: Research on Improving the Seismic Behavior of Earthquake-Resistance Steel Braced Frames. EERI: Oakland, CA.
26. SAC. 1995. Case Studies of Steel Moment Frame Building Performance in the Northridge Earthquake of January 17, 1994. SAC95-05. SAC Joint Venture: Sacramento, CA.
27. SEAOC (Structural Engineers Association of California). 2002. Commentary and Recommendation on FEMA 350. SEAOC: Sacramento, CA.