Electrochemical studies of guanosine in DMF and detection of its radical cation in a scanning electrochemical microscopy nanogap experiment

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 3690-3691

  Bi, Shuping ^a,b   Liu, Biao ^a   Fan, Fu Ren F ^a   Bard, Allen J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE; N,N DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE; RADICAL;

ADSORPTION; AMPEROMETRY; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXIDATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

CATIONS; DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; FREE RADICALS; GUANOSINE; MICROSCOPY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OXIDATION-REDUCTION;

EID: 15744363522     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja042433y     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Masaya, S.; Yoshiko, N.; Nobuyoshi, N. Ann. Neurol. 2003, 54, S32-S45.
2. Gian Piero, S.; Giovanni, G. Synlett 2004, 4, 596-602.
3. Giese, B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 631-636.
4. Steenken, S.; Jovanovic, S. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 617-618.
5. Steenken, S. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 503-520.
6. Burrows, C. J.; Muller, J. G. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 1109-1151.
7. Kino, K.; Saito, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7373-7374.
8. Subramanian, P.; Dryhurst, G. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1987, 224, 137-162.
9. Goyal, R. N.; Jain, N.; Grag, D. K. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1997, 43, 105-114.
10. Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy, Bard, A. J., Mirkin, M. V., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001; Chapters 1 and 7.
11. (a) Unwin, P. R.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7814-7824.
12. (b) Zhou, F. M.; Unwin, P. R.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 4917-4924.
13. (c) Zhou, F. M.; Bard, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 393-394.
14. (d) Engstrom, R. C.; Pharr, C. M. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 1099A-1104A.
15. (e) Treichel, D. A.; Mirkin, M. V.; Bard, A. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5751-5757.
16. Oliveira-Brett, A. M.; da Silva, A. A.; Brett, C. M. A. Langmuir 2002, 18, 2326-2330.
17. Oliveira-Brett, A. M.; Matysik, F. M. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 1997, 42, 111-116.
18. Dryhurst, G. Anal. Chim. Acta 1971, 57, 137-149.
19. Denuault, G.; Mirkin, M. V.; Bard, A. J. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1991, 508, 27-38.
20. Faraggi, M.; Broitman, F.; Trent, J. B.; Klapper, M. H. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 14751-14761.
21. .+ was collected at the substrate after correction for its total background current (offset current of the SECM instrument plus a small amount of Gs oxidation) at 1.1 V bias. This d value was close to that for the case of curve 2 of Figure 2 (d = 0.3 μm).
22. +/Fc potential is taken as +0.424 V versus SCE.