The Luther-Emery liquid: Spin gap and anomalous flux period

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Seidel, Alexander ^a   Lee, Dung Hai ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BOSON; ELECTRIC MODEL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENERGY; LIGHT SCATTERING; LIQUID; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; QUANTUM MECHANICS; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 15744363461     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045113     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J. Sólyom, Adv. Phys, 28, 201 (1979).
2. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 1358 (1980).
3. A. Luther and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 589 (1974).
4. N. Byers and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961).
5. W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 133, A171 (1964).
6. A. Seidel and D.-H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 046401 (2004).
7. M. Ogata, M. U. Luchini, and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 44, 12 083 (1991).
8. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. 96A, 365 (1983).
9. R. Heidenreich, R. Seiler, and D. A. Uhlenbrock, J. Stat. Phys. 22, 27 (1980).
10. F. D. M. Haldane, J. Phys. C 14, 2585 (1981).
11. F. D. M. Haldane, in Electron Correlation and Magnetism in Narrow-Band Systems, edited by T. Moriya (Springer, New York, 1981), pp. 151-162.
12. D. Loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 343 (1992).
13. F. V. Kusmartsev, JETP Lett. 60, 649 (1994).
14. A. Sudbø, C. M. Varma, T. Giamarchi, E. B. Stechel, and R. T. Scalettar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 978 (1993).
15. E. B. Stechel, A. Sudbø, T. Giamarchi, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B 51, 553 (1995).
16. D. C. Mattis and E. H. Lieb, J. Math. Phys. 6, 304 (1965).
17. J. von Delft and H. Schoeller, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7, 225 (1998).
18. J. Voit, Rep. Prog. Phys. 58, 977 (1995).
19. r,s with integer coefficients.
20. S. T. Chui and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 315 (1975).
21. σ leaves the cosine-interaction invariant, as discussed in Appendix A.
22. F. D. M. Haldane, Phys. Rev. B 25, 4925 (1982).
23. S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D 11, 2088 (1975).
24. In principle, this method is not limited to the charge sector though, if one formally assigns opposite electric "charges" to up-spin and down-spin particles when coupling to flux.
25. σ instead.
26. Systems with a macroscopic magnetization in their ground state, which may also have a spin gap in the case of anisotropy, should be excluded from this statement.
27. N. Yu and M. Fowler, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11 795 (1992).
28. 0/2 flux period that are also observed for noninteracting, odd N systems.
29. p values differ by multiples of 4. In this case, one may not expect sharp cusps even in the absence of a charge gap.
30. A. Ferretti, I. O. Kulik, and A. Lami, Phys. Rev. B 45, 5486 (1992).
31. F. V. Kusmartsev, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 3, 3199 (1991).
32. V. Ferrari and G. Chiappe, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 8, 8583 (1996).
33. f/ α a can be interpreted as the bandwidth of an underlying microscopic system.
34. r(x).
35. D. J. Thouless, Phys. Rep., Phys. Lett. 13, 93 (1974).
36. A. Bohm, Quantum Mechanics, Foundations and Applications (Springer, New York, 2001).
37. K. Schönhammer, Phys. Rev. A 66, 014101 (2002).
38. K. Schönhammer, Phys. Rev. B 63, 245102 (2001).