Master planning for stream protection in urban watersheds

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 239-247

  Urbonas, B R ^a   Doerfer, J T ^a  

^a Urban Drainage and Flood Control District   (United States)

Author keywords

Aquatic habitat; Fluvial geomorphology; Planning; Stream protection; Urban stormwater

Indexed keywords

ESTUARIES; RIVERS; RUNOFF; URBAN PLANNING;

MASTER PLANNING; STREAMS; URBAN WATERSHED;

WATERSHEDS;

RUNOFF; STORM WATER;

STORMWATER; URBAN DRAINAGE; URBANIZATION;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CITY PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ESTUARY; FLOODING; GEOMORPHOLOGY; LAKE; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIVER; STREAM (RIVER); URBAN AREA; URBANIZATION; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

EID: 15544389835     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0053     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. APWA (1981). Urban stormwater management, Special Report No. 49. ISBN 0-917084-41-1. American Public Works Association, Kansas City, MO, USA.
2. ASCE and WEF (1992). Design and construction of urban stormwater management systems. ISBN 0-87262855-8. Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.
3. Bledsoe, B. (2002). Relationships of stream response to hydrologic changes, Proceedings of a 2001 E.F. Conference: Linking Stormwater BMP Designs to Receiving Water Impact Mitigation, p. 127-144. ISBN 0-7844-0602-2. Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.
4. Buie, E.C. (1970). Planning water control for urbanizing watersheds. Proceedings: ASCE National Water Resources Engineering Meeting, Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.
5. DeGroot, W.R. and Urbonas, B.R. (2000). Added benefits of grade control structures. J. Floodplain Mgt., 2(1), 7-12.
6. Doerfer, J.T. and Urbonas, B.R. (1993). Stormwater quality characterization in the Denver metropolitan area. Flood Hazard News Urban Drainage and Hood Control Dist., Denver, CO.
7. Dunne, T. and Leopold, L.B. (1978). Water in Environmental Planning. ISBN 0-7167-0079-4. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CA, USA.
8. Guo, J.C.Y. and Urbonas, B. (1996). Maximized detention volume determined by runoff capture ratio. J. Water Res. Plann. Manage., 33(1), 102-113.
9. Harvey, M.D. and Watson, C.W. (1986). Fluvial processes and morphological thresholds in incised channel restoration. Water Resources Bulletin, 22(3), 359-368.
10. Horner, R., May, C., Livingston, E., Blaha, D., Scoggins, M., Tims, J. and Maxted, J. (2002). Structural and non-structural best management practices (BMPs) for protecting streams, Proceedings of a 2001 E.F. Conference: Linking Stormwater BMP Designs to Receiving Water Impact Mitigation, p. 60-77. (Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.)
11. Leopold, L.B. and Miller, J.P. (1956). Ephemeral streams - Hydraulic factors and their relation to the drainage net, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-A.
12. Leopold, L.B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning - A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use, U.S. Geological Survey Circular 554.
13. MacRae, C.R. (1996). Experience from morphological research on Canadian streams: Is control of the two-year frequency event the best basis for stream channel protection? Proceedings of an E.F. Conference: Effects of Watershed Development and Management on Aquatic Life (Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.).
14. Nardi, C. and Roesner, L.A. (2003). Making the case for stormwater volume controls. Proceedings: Experience with Best Management Practices in Colorado, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, USA. pp. 61-73.
15. Schueler, T. (1994). The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1(3), 100-111.
16. Sovern, D.T. and Washington, P.M. (1996). Effects of urban growth on stream habitat. Proceedings of an E.F. Conference: Effects of Watershed Development and Management on Aquatic Life. Am. Soc. of Civil Eng., Reston, VA, USA.
17. UDFCD (1999). Urban storm drainage criteria manual: Volume 3 - Best management practices. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, USA. (Revised Apr. 30, 2003). http://www.udfcd.org/usdcm/vol3.htm
18. UDFCD (1969). Urban storm drainage criteria manual: Volumes 1 and 2. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, USA. (Revised June 2001).
19. UDFCD (2001). Urban storm drainage criteria manual: Volumes 1 and 2. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, USA.
20. Urbonas, B., and Glidden, M.W. (1981). Potential effectiveness of detention policies. Flood Hazard News, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, Colorado, USA, http://udfcd.org/techpapers.htm
21. Urbonas, B.R. (2003). Effectiveness of urban stormwater BMPs in semi-arid climates, Proceedings: Experience with Best Management Practices in Colorado, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, Denver, CO, USA. April 2003, pp. 6-19. http://udfcd.org/techpapers.htm
22. U.S. EPA (1983). Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program: Volume 1 - Final Report, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
23. White, G.F. (1945). Human adjustment to floods: A geographical approach to the flood problem in the United States, Research Paper No. 29, University of Chicago, Department of Geography, Chicago, IL, USA.