|
Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 72-74
|
Dealing with ostomies: Good care, good devices, good quality of life
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
DEODORANT AGENT;
CANDIDA;
CANDIDIASIS;
CAUTERIZATION;
COLORECTAL CANCER;
COLOSTOMY;
EQUIPMENT DESIGN;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HOSPITAL DISCHARGE;
HUMAN;
ILEOSTOMY;
INDEPENDENCE;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION;
PATIENT ATTITUDE;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REVIEW;
SKIN ALLERGY;
SKIN DISEASE;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT PLANNING;
URINARY DIVERSION;
VARICOSIS;
WOUND CARE;
BLADDER TUMOR;
COLON POUCH;
COLORECTAL TUMOR;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CYSTOSTOMY;
EQUIPMENT;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
ILEITIS;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
PEER REVIEW;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
STANDARD;
COLONIC POUCHES;
COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS;
COLOSTOMY;
CYSTOSTOMY;
DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE;
EQUIPMENT SAFETY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
MALE;
PEER REVIEW;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS;
POUCHITIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;
URINARY DIVERSION;
URINARY RESERVOIRS, CONTINENT;
|
EID: 15544385459
PISSN: 15446794
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Review |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (7)
|