|
Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 195-303
|
Infected judgment: legal responses to physician bias.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CLASSIFICATION;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COMPENSATION;
DECISION MAKING;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
MALE;
OBESITY;
PATIENT;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PHYSICIAN;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
RACE;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;
STATISTICS;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
COMPENSATION AND REDRESS;
CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
MALE;
OBESITY;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PATIENTS;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS;
PHYSICIANS;
PREJUDICE;
SEX FACTORS;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
STEREOTYPING;
TRUST;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 15544378566
PISSN: 00426229
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (14)
|
References (0)
|