Dynamic properties of antennal responses to pheromone in two moth species

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 2233-2239

  Justus, Kristine A ^a   Cardé, Ring T ^a   French, Andrew S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHEROMONE; PROPYLENE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTENNA; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); DYNAMICS; HORMONE RESPONSE; MALE; MODEL; MOTH; NONHUMAN; ODOR; PLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTOR SENSITIVITY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STIMULATION; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; MALE; MOTHS; PHEROMONES; SMELL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 15544375370     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00888.2004     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ache BW, Munger S, and Zhainazarov A. Organizational complexity in lobster olfactory receptor cells. Ann NY Acad Sci 855: 194-198, 1998.
2. Baker TC, Ochieng' SA, Cossé AA, Lee SG, Todd JL, Quero C, and Vickers NJ. A comparison of responses from olfactory receptor neurons of Heliothis subflexa and Heliothis virescens to components of their sex pheromone. J Comp Physiol [A] 190: 155-165, 2004.
3. Bau J, Justus KA, and Cardé RT. Antennal resolution of pulsed pheromone plumes in three moth species. J Insect Physiol 48: 433-442, 2002.
4. Bendat JS and Piersol AG. Engineering Applications of Correlation and Spectral Analysis. New York: Wiley, 1980.
5. Carlsson MA and Hansson BS. Responses in highly selective sensory neurons to blends of pheromone components in the moth Agrotis segetum. J Insect Physiol 48: 443-451, 2002.
6. Chapman KM and Pankhurst JH. Conduction velocities and their temperature coefficients in sensory nerve fibres of cockroach legs. J Exp Biol 46: 63-84, 1967.
7. Cooley JW and Tukey JW. An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math Comput 19: 297-301, 1965.
8. Cossé AA, Todd JL, and Baker TC. Neurons discovered in male Helicoverpa zea antennae that correlate with pheromone-mediated attraction and interspecific antagonism. J Comp Physiol [A] 182: 585-594, 1998.
9. French AS and Marmarelis VZ. Nonlinear analysis of neuronal systems. In: Modern Techniques in Neuroscience Research, edited by Windhorst U and Johansson H. Berlin: Springer, 1999, p. 627-640.
10. French AS and Torkkeli PH. Sensory receptors and mechanotransduction. In: Cell Physiology Sourcebook-A Molecular Approach, edited by Sperelakis N. San Diego, CA: Academic, 2001, p. 761-773.
11. Hunter IW and Korenberg MJ. The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models. Biol Cybern 55: 135-144, 1986.
12. Justus KA, Murlis J, Jones C, and Cardé RT. Measurement of odor-plume structure in a wind tunnel using a photoionization detector and a tracer gas. Env Fluid Mech 2: 115-142, 2002a.
13. Justus KA, Schofield SW, Murlis J, and Cardé RT. Flight behaviour of Cadra cautella males in rapidly pulsed pheromone plumes. Physiol Entomol 27: 59-66, 2002b.
14. Juusola M and French AS. The efficiency of sensory information coding by mechanoreceptor neurons. Neuron 18: 959-968, 1997.
15. Kaissling KE and Thorson J. Insect olfactory sensilla: structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization. In: Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones, and Pheromones in Insects, edited by Satelle DB, Hall LM, and Hildebrand JG. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, 1980, p. 261-282.
16. Mafra-Neto A and Cardé RT. Influence of plume structure and pheromone concentration on upwind flight of Cadra cautella males. Physiol Entomol 20: 117-133, 1995.
17. Mafra-Neto A and Cardé RT. Rate of realized interception of pheromone pulses in different wind speeds modulates almond moth orientation. J Comp Physiol [A] 182: 563-572, 1998.
18. Murlis J, Elkinton JS, and Cardé RT. Odor plumes and how insects use them. Annu Rev Entomol 37: 505-532, 1992.
19. Niven JE, Vähäsöyrinki M, Kauranen M, Hardie RC, Juusola M, and Weckström M. The contribution of Shaker K(+) channels to the information capacity of Drosophila photoreceptors. Nature 421: 630-634, 2003.
20. Persoons CJ, van der Kraan C, Nooijen WJ, Ritter FJ, Voerman S, and Baker TC. Sex pheromone of the beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua: isolation, identification and preliminary field evaluation. Entomol Exp Appl 30: 98-99, 1981.
21. Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, and Vetterling WT. Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
22. Schneider D. Insect antenna. Annu Rev Entomol 9: 103-122, 1964.
23. Shannon CE and Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
24. Shorey HH and Hale RL. Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. J Econ Entomol 58: 522-524, 1965.
25. Van Der Pers JNC and Den Otter CJ. Single cell responses from olfactory receptors of small ermine moths to sex-attractants. J Insect Physiol 24: 337-343, 1978.
26. Vickers NJ, Christensen TA, Baker TC, and Hildebrand JG. Odor-plume dynamics influence the brain's olfactory code. Nature 410: 466-470, 2001.
27. Willis MA and Baker TC. Effects of intermittent and continuous pheromone stimulation on the flight behavior of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta. Physiol Entomol 9: 341-358, 1984.
28. Zacharuk RY. Antennae and sensilla. In: Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology, edited by Kerkut GA and Gilbert LI. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. 1985, p. 1-69.