Influence of casting methods on marginal and internal discrepancies of complete cast crowns

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 127-132

  Milan, Fábio Machado ^a   Consani, Simonides ^a   Correr Sobrinho, Lourenço ^a   Sinhoreti, Mario Alexandre Coelho ^a   Sousa Neto, Manoel D ^b,c   Knowles, Jonathan C ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF RIBEIRÃO PRETO   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNICAMP ^*

Author keywords

Casting techniques; Dental alloy; Marginal discrepancy

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; OXYGEN; PALLADIUM; SILVER; WAX;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL TECHNOLOGY; DENTURE; ELECTRIC RESISTANCE; GAS; ORTHODONTICS; TOOTH CROWN; CEMENTATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CASTING TECHNIQUE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); PALLADIUM; SILVER; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH PREPARATION, PROSTHODONTIC;

EID: 15544375193     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402004000200008     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Eames WB, O'Neal SJ, Monteiro J, Miller C, Roan Jr JD, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of castings. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:432-437.
2. Carter SM, Wilson PR. The effect of die-spacing on crown retention. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:21-29.
3. Passon C, Lambert RH, Lambert RL, Newman S. The effect of multiple layers of die-spacer on crown retention. Oper Dent 1992;17:42-49.
4. Carter SM, Wilson PR. The effects of die-spacing on post-cementation crown elevation and retention. Aust Dent J 1997;42:192-198.
5. Campagni R, Preston JD, Reisbeck MH. Measurement of paint-on die spacers used for casting relief. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:606-611.
6. Grajower R, Lewinstein I, Zelster C. The effective minimum cement thickness of zinc phosphate cement for luted non-precious crowns. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:235-245.
7. Gegauff AG, Rosenstiel SF. Reassessment of die-spacer with dynamic loading during cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:655-658.
8. Vermilyea SG, Kuffler MJ, Huget EF. The effects of die relief agent on the retention of full coverage castings. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:207-210.
9. Veronesi SG, Consani S, Ruhnke LA. The influence of casting methods on the surface microhardness and crystalline formation of aluminum-copper alloys. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:26-29.
10. Dedemon HW. The relationship between open margins and margin designs on full cast crowns made by commercial dental laboratories. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:463-465.
11. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Fischer DW. Preparation design and margin distortion in porcelain-fused-to-metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:276-284.
12. Zidan O, Ferguson GC. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:565-571.
13. Byrne G. Influence of finish-line form on crown cementation. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:137-144.
14. Syu JZ, Byrne G, Laub LW, Land MS. Influence on finish-line geometry on the fit of crown. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:25-30.
15. Strandman E, Glantz P. On the characteristics of acetylene-oxygen flames used in dental casting. Odont Revy 1976;27:197-222.
16. Hollenback GM. Practical contribution to the standardization of casting technique. J Am Dent Assoc 1928;40:520-525.
17. American Society for Metals and Tests. Metals Handbook, 8th ed. Ohio; 1964. p. 1194.
18. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305.
19. Dedmon HW. Disparity in expert opinions on size of acceptable margin opening. Oper Dent 1982;7:97-101.
20. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Brit Dent J 1971;131:107-111.