The scientific specialisation of the Italian regions

Scientometrics

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 87-111

  Tuzi, Fabrizio ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15444378244     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-005-0005-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. T. BRAUN, Bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of universities-intelligence from the quantification of the scientific literature, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 425-432.
2. M. PIANTA, D. ARCHIBUGI, Specialization and size of scientific activities: a bibliometric analysis of advanced countries, Scientometrics, 22 (1991) 341-358.
3. W. GLÄNZEL, H. MACZELKA, A. SCHUBERT, World science in the eighties. National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985-1989 versus 1980-1984. Part I. All science fields combined, physics and chemistry, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 299-334.
4. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, H. MACZELKA, A. SCHUBERT, World science in the eighties. National performances in publication output and citation impact, 1985-1989 versus 1980-1984. Part II. Life sciences, engineering and mathematics, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 3-30.
5. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, H. GRUPP, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993. Part I. All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics, Scientometrics, 33 (1995) 263-293.
6. T. BRAUN, W. GLÄNZEL, H. GRUPP, The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989-1993. Part II. Life sciences, Scientometrics, 34 (1995) 207-237.
7. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Third European Report on S&T Indicators, 2003. Towards a Knowledge-Based Economy, European Communities, Belgium, 2003, pp. 276-318.
8. C. FREEMAN, Technology Policy and Economics Performance. Lessons from Japan, Frances Pinter, London, 1987.
9. J. S. METCALFE, Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19 (1995) 25-46.
10. J. HOWELLS, Regional system of innovation, In: D. ARCHIBUGI et al. (Eds), Innovation Policy in a Global Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1999, pp. 67-93.
11. K. PAVITT, The social shaping of the national science base, Research Policy, 27 (1998) 793-805.
12. L. TSIPOURI, Evaluation at regional level - Science and technology in structural funds, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 509-515.
13. F. TUZI, Useful science is good science: empirical evidences from the Italian National Research Council, to be published in Technovation in 2004.
14. TH. N. VAN LEEUWEN, H. F. MOED, R. J. W. TIJSSEN, M. S. VISSER, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of national research performance, Scientometrics, 51 (2001) 335-346.
15. A. BONACCORSI, C. DARAIO, The organization of science. Size, agglomeration and age effects in scientific productivity. In: NPRNet Conference: Rethinking Science Policy, London, 2002.
16. J. D. FRAME, Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean, Interciencia, 2 (1977) 143.
17. E. BUJDOSÓ, T. BRAUN, Publication indicators of relative research efforts in physics subfields, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34 (1983) 150.
18. A. SCHUBERT, T. BRAUN, Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 281-291.
19. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Second European Report on S&T indicators, 1997. Appendix: Methodological Annex, European Communities, Belgium, 1997, M22-M24.
20. E. GARFIELD, How can impact factors be improved? British Medical Journal, 313 (1986) 411-413.