Some considerations for safety analysis of chemical reactors

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Volumn 83, Issue 2 A, 2005, Pages 167-176

  Molnar A ^a   Markoš, Josef ^a   Jelemensky L ^a  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

Bifurcation diagrams; Multiple steady states; Safety analysis of CSTR; Stability analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; PROGRAM TOOLS; SAFETY ANALYSIS;

CHEMICAL REACTORS;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; REACTOR; SAFETY FACTOR;

EID: 15444367830     PISSN: 02638762     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1205/cherd.03284     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Allgower, E.L. and Georg, K., 1990, Numerical Continuation Methods. An Introduction. (Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany).
2. Astarita, G. and Ocone, R., 1992, Chemical reactor engineering of complex mixtures, Chem Eng Sci, 47: 2135-2147.
3. Farr, W.W. and Aris, R., 1986, Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him? Reflections on the multiplicity of steady states of the stirred tank reactor, Chem Eng Sci, 41: 1385-1402.
4. Fogler, H.S., 1999, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering. (Prentice Hall Inc., London, UK).
5. Gray, P. and Scott, S.K., 1983, Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: Isolas and other forms of multistability, Chem Eng Sci, 38(1): 29-43.
6. Gray, P. and Scott, S.K., 1984, Autocatalytic reactions in the isothermal, continuous stirred tank reactor: Oscillations and instabilities in the system A + 2B → 3B; B → C, Chem Eng Sci., 39(6): 1087-1097.
7. Heerden, C.V., 1953, Autothermic processes, Ind Engng Chem, 45: 1242-1247.
8. Chemburkar, R.M., Morbidelli, M. and Varma, A., 1986, Parametric sensitivity of a CSTR, Chem Eng Sci, 41: 1647-1654.
9. Kubíček, M., 1976, Algorithm 502. Dependence of solution of nonlinear systems on a parameter [C5], ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 2: 98-107.
10. Kubíček, M. and Marek, M., 1983, Computational Methods in Bifurcation Theory and Dissipative Structures. (Springer-Verlag, New York, USA).
11. Lees, F.P., 1996, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Hazard Identification, Assessment and Control (Reed Educational and Professional Publishing, UK).
12. Mancusi, E., Merola, G., Crescitelli, S. and Maffettone, P.L., 2000, Multistability and hysteresis in an industrial ammonia reactor, AIChE 46: 824-828.
13. Molnár, A., Markoš, J. and Jelemenský, L'., 2002, Accuracy of mathematical model with regard to safety analysis of chemical reactors. Chemical Papers 56: 357-361.
14. Molnár, A., Markoš, J. and Jelemenský, L., 2003, Mathematical models for safety analysis of chemical reactors-the role of the model accuracy, 4th European Congress of Chemical Engineering, Granada, Spain.
15. Molnár, A., Markoš, J. and Jelemenský, L., 2003, Safety analysis of CSTR towards changes in operating conditions, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 16: 373-380.
16. Morbidelli, M., Varma, A. and Aris, R., 1987, Reactor Steady-State Multiplicity and Stability. Chemical Reaction and Reactor Engineering Carberry and Varma (eds) (Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA).
17. Morud, J.C. and Skogestad, S., 1998, Analysis of Instability in an industrial ammonia reactor, AIChE Journal, 44: 888-895.
18. Pongo, J. and Poras, W., 1996, HYSYS Reference, Hyprotech Ltd.
19. Šoóš, M., Markoš, J. and Jelemenský, L., 2001, Safety of chemical reactors, Petroleum and Coal, 43: 188-192.
20. Westerterp, K.R., Swaaij, W.P.M.V. and Beenackers, A.A.C.M., 1984, Chemical Reactor Design and Operation, (Netherlands University Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).