Long-term trends in mesozooplankton abundance in Chesapeake Bay, USA: Influence of freshwater input

Marine Ecology Progress Series

Volumn 267, Issue , 2004, Pages 71-83

  Kimmel, David G ^a   Roman, Michael R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acartia tonsa; Estuary; Eurytemora affinis; Freshwater input; Linear mixed effects model; Trend analysis

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; FRESHWATER INPUT; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ZOOPLANKTON;

CHESAPEAKE BAY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ACARTIA; ACARTIA TONSA; COELENTERATA; COPEPODA; EURYTEMORA; EURYTEMORA AFFINIS; MNEMIOPSIS LEIDYI;

EID: 1542790186     PISSN: 01718630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3354/meps267071     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aleem AA (1972) Effect of river outflow management on marine life. Mar Biol 15:200-208
2. Ambler JW, Cloern JE, Hutchinson A (1985) Seasonal cycles of zooplankton from San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129:177-197
3. Bradley BP (1991) Distribution of copepods in coastal zone waters: seasonal succession in Chesapeake Bay. Bull Plankton Soc Jpn Spec Vol 129-131
4. Brownlee DC, Jacobs F (1987) Mesozooplankton and microzooplankton in the Chesapeake Bay. In: Majumdar SK, Hall LW, Austin HW (eds) Contaminant problems and management of living Chesapeake Bay resources, Vol 527. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, Philadelphia, PA, p 217-269
5. Bue CD (1968) Monthly surface-water inflow to Chesapeake Bay: US Geological Survey Open-File Report, United States Geological Survey, Arlington, VA
6. Cargo DG, King DR (1990) Forecasting the abundance of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha, in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 13:486-491
7. CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program) (2000) Guide to living resources data. Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, MD
8. Crump BC, Baross JA, Simenstad CA (1998) Dominance of particle-attached bacteria in the Columbia River estuary, USA. Aquat Microb Ecol 14:7-18
9. Flint RW (1985) Long-term estuarine variability and associated biological response. Estuaries 8:158-169
10. Hairston NG (1996) Zooplankton egg banks as biotic reservoirs in changing environments. Limnol Oceanogr 41:1087-1092
11. Harding LW (1994) Long-term trends in the distribution of phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay: roles of light, nutrients and streamflow. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 104:267-291
12. Harding LW, Perry ES (1997) Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 157:39-52
13. ICPRB (Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin) (2000) The 1998-1999 Split-sample study for the Chesapeake Bay program phytoplankton, microzooplankton and mesozooplankton monitoring components. ICPRB Report 00-3, Rockville, MD
14. Jassby AD, Powell TM (1994) Hydrodynamic influences on interannual chlorophyll variability in an estuary: upper San Francisco Bay-Delta (California: USA). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 39:595-618
15. Jung S (2002) Fish community structure and the spatial and temporal variability in recruitment and biomass production in Chesapeake Bay. PhD thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
16. Kimmel DG, Bradley BP (2001) Specific protein responses in the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis (Poppe, 1880) to salinity and temperature variation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 266:135-149
17. Kimmerer WJ (2002) Effects of freshwater flow on abundance of estuarine organisms: physical effects or trophic linkages? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:39-55
18. Livingston R, Niu X, Lewis F III, Woodsum G (1997) Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: long-term control of trophic organization. Ecol Appl 7:277-299
19. Mallin MA, Paerl HW, Rudek J, Bates PW (1993) Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 93:199-203
20. Malone TC, Crocker LH, Pike SE, Wendler BW (1988) Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 48:235-249
21. Montagna PA, Kalke RD (1992) The effect of freshwater inflow on meiofaunal and macrofaunal populations in the Guadalupe and Nueces estuaries, Texas. Estuaries 15:307-326
22. North EW, Houde ED (2001) Retention of white perch and striped bass larvae: biological-physical interactions in Chesapeake Bay estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries 24:756-769
23. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY
24. Rilling GC, Houde ED (1999) Regional and temporal variability in distribution and abundance of bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) eggs, larvae, and adult biomass in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 22:1096-1109
25. Roman MR, Gauzens AL, Rhinehart WK, White JR (1993) Effects of low oxygen waters on Chesapeake Bay zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 38:1603-1614
26. Roman MR, Holliday DV, Sanford LP (2001) Temporal and spatial patterns of zooplankton in the Chesapeake Bay turbidity maximum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 213:215-227
27. Schubel JR, Pritchard DW (1986) Responses of upper Chesapeake Bay to variations in discharge of the Susquehanna River. Estuaries 9:236-249
28. Sieburth JM, Smetacek V, Lenz J (1978) Pelagic ecosystem structure: heterotrophic compartments of the plankton and their relationship to plankton size fractions. Limnol Oceanogr 23:1256-1263
29. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, New York
30. Uphoff JH (1989) Environmental effects on survival of eggs, larvae and juveniles of striped bass in the Choptank River, Maryland. Trans Am Fish Soc 118:251-263
31. Venables WN, Ripley BD (1999) Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer-Verlag, New York
32. White JR, Roman MR (1992) Seasonal study of grazing by metazoan zooplankton in the mesohaline Chesapeake Bay. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 86:251-261
33. Workshop on Trophic Change in Chesapeake Bay Open Water Habitat (1998) A workshop to evaluate and interpret recent trends. Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) of the Chesapeake Bay Program. Solomons, MD