Microhabitat Affinities of Missouri Ozarks Lichens

Bryologist

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-61

  Peck, JeriLynn E ^a,d   Grabner, Jennifer ^b   Ladd, Douglas ^c   Larsen, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION   (United States)

^c MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community; Host; Microhabitat; MOFEP; Oak forest; Ozark lichens; Substrate

Indexed keywords

QUERCUS; QUERCUS ALBA; QUERCUS RUBRA;

EID: 1542788579     PISSN: 00072745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1639/0007-2745(2004)107[47:MAOMOL]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. BEALS, E. 1984. Bray-Curtis Ordination: An effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data, pp. 3-55. In A. Macfadyen & E. Ford (eds.), Advances in Ecological Research 14.
2. DE WIT, T. 1983. Lichens as indicators of air quality. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 3: 273-282.
3. DUFRENE, M. & P. LEGENDRE. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345-366.
4. ESSEEN, P.-A. & K. RENHORN. 1998. Edge effects on an epiphytic lichen in fragmented forests. Conservation Biology 12: 1307-1317.
5. _ & R. PETTERSSON. 1996. Epiphytic lichen biomass in managed and old-growth boreal forests: effect of branch quality. Ecological Applications 6: 228-238.
6. HALE, M. E. 1965. Vertical distribution of cryptogams in a red maple swamp in Connecticut. THE BRYOLOGIST 68: 193-197.
7. HILMO, O. 1994. Distribution and succession of epiphytic lichens on Picea abies branches in a boreal forest, Central Norway. Lichenologist 26: 149-170.
8. HOFFMAN, G. & R. KAZMIERSKI. 1969. An ecologic study of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens on Pseudotsuga menziesii on the Olympic Peninsula, Washington I. Description of the vegetation. THE BRYOLOGIST 72: 1-19.
9. HOSOKAWA, T., N. ODANI & H. TAGAWA. 1964. Causality of the distribution of corticolous species in forests with special reference to the physio-ecological approach. THE BRYOLOGIST 67: 396-411.
10. JENSEN, R. 1993. MOFEP Overstory Data Collection Procedures. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO.
11. JESBERGER, J. & J. SHEARD. 1973. A quantitative study and multivariate analysis of corticolous lichen communities in the southern boreal forest of Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Botany 51: 185-201.
12. KNOPS, J., T NASH III & W. SCHLESINGER. 1996. The influence of epiphytic lichens on the nutrient cycling of an oak woodland. Ecological Monographs 66: 159-179.
13. LADD, D. 1991a. Preliminary list of the rare and endangered macrolichens of Missouri. Transactions, Missouri Academy of Science 25: 5-12.
14. _. 1991b. Reexamination of the role of fire in Missouri oak woodlands, pp. 67-80. In Proceedings of the Oak Woods Management Workshop. Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, IL.
15. _. 1993. Conservation of bryo-lichen biodiversity: a Missouri perspective. American Journal of Botany 80: 5. [abstract]
16. _. 1996. Lichen Assessment and Monitoring in Two Oak Woodlands, Mark Twain National Forest, Missouri. Final Report, USDA Forest Service Contract 40-64R7-3-50.
17. _. 1998. Looking at lichens. Missouri Conservationist 59: 8-13.
18. _. 2002. Lichens of the Lower Ozark Region of Missouri and Arkansas. Missouri Botanical Garden/Nature Conservancy Report to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO.
19. _ & J. GRABNER. 1996. Lichen species composition in the Southeastern Ozarks. A progress report of work completed submitted to the Missouri Department of Conservation, MOFEP.
20. LANG, G., W. REINERS & L. PIKE. 1980. Structure and biomass dynamics of epiphytic lichen communities of balsam fir forests in New Hampshire. Ecology 61: 541-550.
21. LESICA, P., B. MCCUNE, S. COOPER & W. HONG. 1991. Differences in lichen and bryophyte communities between old-growth and managed second-growth forests in the Swan Valley, Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany 69: 1745-1755.
22. 2 gradients in Indianapolis. THE BRYOLOGIST 91: 223-228.
23. _. 1993. Gradients in epiphyte biomass in three Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forests of different ages in western Oregon and Washington. THE BRYOLOGIST 96: 405-411.
24. _ & J. ANTOS. 1982. Epiphyte communities of the Swan Valley, Montana. THE BRYOLOGIST 85: 1-12.
25. _, J. DEY, J. PECK, K. HEIMAN & S. WILL-WOLF. 1997a. Regional gradients in lichen communities of the southeast United States. THE BRYOLOGIST 100: 145-158.
26. _, K. A. AMSBERRY, F. J. CAMACHO, S. CLERY, C. COLE, C. EMERSON, G. FELDER, P. FRENCH, D. GREENE, R. HARRIS, M. HUTTEN, B. LARSON, M. LESKO, S. MAJORS, T. MARKWELL, G. G. PARKER, K. PENDERGRASS, E. B. PETERSON, E. T. PETERSON, J. PLATT, J. PROCTOR, T. RAMBO, A. ROSSO, D. SHAW, R. TURNER & M. WIDMER. 1997b. Vertical profile of epiphytes in a Pacific Northwest old-growth forest. Northwest Science 71: 145-152.
27. _ & J. B. GRACE. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Gleneden Beach, Oregon: MjM Software Design.
28. _ & P. LESICA. 1992. The trade-off between species capture and quantitative accuracy in ecological inventory of lichens and bryophytes in forests in Montana. THE BRYOLOGIST 95: 296-304.
29. _ & J. MEFFORD. 1999. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, PC-ORD Vers. 4.01. MjM Software, Glenedon Beach, OR.
30. _, R. ROSENTRETER, J. PONZETTI & D. SHAW. 2000. Epiphyte habitats in an old conifer forest in western Washington, USA. THE BRYOLOGIST 103: 417-427.
31. MEINERT, D., T. NIGH & J. KABRICK. 1997. Landforms, geology, and soils of the MOFEP study area, pp. 56-68. In Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: An Experimental Approach to Landscape Research. June 3-5, St. Louis, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-193, USDA FS North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
32. MIELKE, P., K. BERRY & G. BRIER. 1981. Applications of multi-response permutation procedures for examining seasonal changes in monthly sea-level pressure patterns. Monthly Weather Review 109: 120-126.
33. NEITLICH, P. 1993. Lichen abundance and biodiversity along a chronosequence from young managed stands to ancient forest. Masters thesis, Department of Botany, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
34. NILSSON, S., U. ARUP, R. BARANOWSKI & S. EKMAN. 1995. Tree-dependent lichens and beetles as indicators in conservation forests. Conservation Biology 9: 1208-1215.
35. PECK, J., J. GRABNER & D. LADD. 2002. The Lichen Communities of the Southeastern Missouri Ozarks: Species Associations and Habitat Portioning. Final report to the Forestry Division, Missouri Department of Conservation, Columbia, MO.
36. PETTERSSON, R., K. RENHORN, P.-A. ESSEEN & K. SJÖBERT. 1995. Invertebrate communities in boreal forest canopies as influenced by forestry and lichens with implications for passerine birds. Biological Conservation 74: 57-63.
37. PIKE, L. 1978. The importance of epiphytic lichens in mineral cycling. THE BRYOLOGIST 81: 247-257.
38. _, W. DENISON, D. TRACY, M. SHERWOOD & F. RHOADES. 1975. Floristic survey of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes growing on old-growth conifers in western Oregon. THE BRYOLOGIST 78: 389-402.
39. SCHMITT, D. & N. SLACK. 1990. Host specificity of epiphytic lichens and bryophytes: A comparison of the Adirondack Mountains (New York) and the Southern Blue Ridge Mountains (North Carolina). THE BRYOLOGIST 93: 257-274.
40. SELVA, S. 1994. Lichen diversity and stand continuity in the northern hardwoods and spruce-fir forests of northern New England and western New Brunswick. THE BRYOLOGIST 97: 424-429.
41. SHANNON, C. & W. WEAVER. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. University of Illinois Press, Urban.
42. SHARNOFF, S. 1994. Use of lichens by wildlife in North America. Research and Exploration 10: 370-371.
43. th Annual Natural Areas Association Conferneces: Post-treatment Results from the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosytem Project. October 16-20, St. Louis, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-227, USDA FS North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN.
44. SHIFLEY, S. & B. BROOKSHIRE. (EDS.) 2000. Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: site history, soils, landforms, woody and herbaceous vegetation, down wood, and inventory methods for the landscape experiment. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-208. St. Paul, MN: U.S.D.A., F.S., North Central Research Station.
45. SHOWMAN, R. 1975. Lichens recolonization following air quality improvement. THE BRYOLOGIST 84: 492-497.
46. _. 1990. Lichen recolonization in the upper Ohio River valley. THE BRYOLOGIST 93: 427-428.
47. SILLETT, S. 1995. Branch epiphyte assemblages in the forest interior and on the clearcut edge of a 700-year-old Douglas fir canopy in western Oregon. THE BRYOLOGIST 98: 301-312.
48. SIMPSON, E. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688.
49. SÖDERSTRÖM, L. 1988. Sequence of bryophytes and lichens in relation to substrate variables of decaying coniferous wood in Northern Sweden. Nordic Journal of Botany 8: 89-97.
50. SOKAL, R. & F. ROHLF. 1981. Biometry. San Francisco, CA.
51. SøRENSEN, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its application to analysis of the vegetation on Danish commons. Biol. Skr. 5: 1-34.
52. STEVENSON, S. 1978. Distribution and abundance of arboreal lichens and their use as forage by blacktailed deer. M.S. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
53. SZCZAWINSKI, A. 1953. Corticolous and Lignicolous Communities in the Forest Associations of the Douglas-fir Forest on Vancouver Island. Ph.D. dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
54. WHITTAKER, R. H. 1973. Approaches to classifying vegetation, pp. 325-354. In R. H. Whittaker (ed.), Ordination and Classification of Communities. Junk, The Hague.
55. WILHELM, G. & D. LADD. 1987. Punctelia perreticulata, a distinct lichen species. Mycotaxon 28: 249-250.