Determination of J/ψ leptonic branching fraction via ψ(2S)→π+π-J/ψ

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 1998, Pages 920061-920066

  Bai, J Z ^a   Bian, J G ^a   Blum, I ^k   Chai, Z W ^a   Chen, G P ^a   Chen, H F ^j   Chen, J ^c   Chen, J C ^a   Chen, Y ^a   Chen, Y B ^a   Chen, Y Q ^a   Cheng, B S ^a   Cui, X Z ^a   Ding, H L ^a   Ding, L Y ^a   Dong, L Y ^a   Du, Z Z ^a   Dunwoodie, W ^g   Feng, S ^a   Gao, C S ^a   Gao, M L ^a   Gao, S Q ^a   Gratton, P ^k   Gu, J H ^a   Gu, S D ^a   Gu, W X ^a   Gu, Y F ^a   Guo, Y N ^a   Han, S W ^a   Han, Y ^a   Harris, F A ^h   He, J ^a   He, J T ^a   He, M ^e   Hitlin, D G ^b   Hu, G Y ^a   Hu, H M ^a   Hu, J L ^a   Hu, Q H ^a   Hu, T ^a   Hu, X Q ^a   Huang, J D ^a   Huang, Y Z ^a   Izen, J M ^k   Jiang, C H ^a   Jin, Y ^a   Ke, Z J ^a   Kelsey, M H ^b   Kim, B K ^k   Kong, D ^h   Lai, Y F ^a   Lang, P F ^a   Lankford, A ⁱ   Li, C G ^a   Li, D ^a   Li, H B ^a   Li, J ^a   Li, P Q ^a   Li, R B ^a   Li, W ^a   Li, W D ^a   Li, W G ^a   Li, X H ^a   Li, X N ^a   Liu, H M ^a   Liu, J ^a   Liu, J H ^a   Liu, R G ^a   Liu, Y ^a   Lou, X C ^k   Lowery, B ^k   Lu, F ^a   Lu, J G ^a   Lu, J Y ^a   Lu, L C ^a   Luo, C H ^a   Ma, A M ^a   Ma, E C ^a   Ma, J M ^a   Malchow, R ^c   Mao, H S ^a   Mao, Z P ^a   Meng, X C ^a   Nie, J ^a   Olsen, S L ^h   Oyang, J ^b   Paluselli, D ^h   Pan, L J ^h   Panetta, J ^b   Porter, F ^b   Qi, N D ^a   Qi, X R ^a   Qian, C D ^f   Qiu, J F ^a   Qu, Y H ^a   Que, Y K ^a   Rong, G ^a   Schernau, M ⁱ   Shao, Y Y ^a   Shen, B W ^a   Shen, D L ^a   Shen, H ^a   Shen, X Y ^a   Sheng, H Y ^a   Shi, H Z ^a   Song, X F ^a   Standifird, J ^k   Sun, F ^a   Sun, H S ^a   Tang, S Q ^a   Toki, W ^c   Tong, G L ^a   Wang, F ^a   Wang, L S ^a   Wang, L Z ^a   Wang, M ^a,a   Wang, P ^a   Wang, P L ^a   Wang, S M ^a   Wang, T J ^a   Wang, Y Y ^a   Weaver, M ^b   Wei, C L ^a   Wu, Y G ^a   Xi, D M ^a   Xia, X M ^a   Xie, P P ^a   Xie, Y ^a   Xie, Y H ^a   Xiong, W J ^a   Xu, C C ^a   Xu, G F ^a   Xue, S T ^a   Yan, J ^a   Yan, W G ^a   Yang, C M ^a   Yang, C Y ^a   Yang, J ^a   Yang, W ^c   Yang, X F ^a   Ye, M H ^a   Ye, S W ^j   Ye, Y X ^j   Yi, K ^a   Yu, C S ^a   Yu, C X ^a   Yu, Y H ^d   Yu, Z Q ^a   Yu, Z T ^a   Yuan, C Z ^a   Yuan, Y ^a   Zhang, B Y ^a   Zhang, C C ^a   Zhang, D H ^a   Zhang, D ^a   Zhang, H L ^a   Zhang, J ^a   Zhang, J L ^a   Zhang, J W ^a   Zhang, L S ^a   Zhang, Q J ^a   Zhang, S Q ^a   Zhang, X Y ^e   Zhang, Y ^a   Zhang, Y Y ^a   Zhao, D X ^a   Zhao, H W ^a   Zhao, J W ^a   Zhao, M ^a   Zhao, W R ^a   Zhao, Z G ^a   Zheng, J P ^a   Zheng, L S ^a   Zheng, Z P ^a   Zhou, G P ^a   Zhou, H S ^a   Zhou, L ^a   Zhu, Q M ^a   Zhu, Y C ^a   Zhu, Y S ^a   Zhuang, B A ^a   more..

^a INSTITUTE OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS   (China)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^e SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^f SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^g SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^k UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542785706     PISSN: 05562821     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.092006     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. W. Kwong et al., Phys. Rev. D 37, 3210 (1988).
2. A. Boyarski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1357 (1975).
3. D. Coffman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 282 (1992).
4. BES Collaboration, J. Z. Bai et al., Phys. Lett. B 355, 374 (1995).
5. BES Collaboration, J. Z. Bai et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 344, 319 (1994).
6. Particle Data Group, R. M. Barnett et al., Phys. Rev. D 54, 1 (1996).
7. recoil distribution is not as clean for these events. We rely on our fitting procedure to extract the signal.
8. The events represented by the polynomial in Fig. 2(a) are predominantly good events but where the low energy pion underwent π→μν decay. Using only the BWG shape to describe the signal makes us less sensitive to background.
9. T. N. Pham, B. Pire, and T. N. Trong, Phys. Lett. 61B, 183 (1976); L. S. Brown and R. N. Cahn, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1 (1975).
10. T. N. Pham, B. Pire, and T. N. Trong, Phys. Lett. 61B, 183 (1976); L. S. Brown and R. N. Cahn, Phys. Rev. D 35, 1 (1975).
11. We have also determined the acceptance allowing the ππ system to have a small amount of D wave. This has negligible effect on the results.
12. F. A. Berends et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 14, 413 (1983); F. A. Berends and R. Kleiss, Nucl. Phys. B177, 237 (1981).
13. F. A. Berends et al., Acta Phys. Pol. B 14, 413 (1983); F. A. Berends and R. Kleiss, Nucl. Phys. B177, 237 (1981).
14. Χ distribution is used in place of the theoretical distribution in the determination of the acceptances.
15. k the fraction of multiplicity-k events. By solving the overdetermined equations above, we estimate the J/ψ charged-track-multiplicity distribution shown in Table II.
16. R. Baldini-Celio et al., Phys. Lett. 58B, 471 (1975); Min-Zu Wang, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Iowa, 1993.
17. R. Baldini-Celio et al., Phys. Lett. 58B, 471 (1975); Min-Zu Wang, Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Iowa, 1993.
18. 6 ψ(2S) events.
19. The difference in the branching ratios due to the difference in phase space for the two modes is small compared to the experimental errors.
20. H. C. Chiang et al., Phys. Lett. B 324, 482 (1994).
21. D. L. Scharre et al., Phys. Rev. D 23, 43 (1981).