Proposed support design, Kaletepe tunnel, Turkey

Engineering Geology

Volumn 72, Issue 3-4, 2004, Pages 201-216

  Sari, D ^a   Pasamehmetoglu, A G ^a  

^a ATILIM UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Empirical method; Numerical analysis; Q; RMR; Tunneling

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL METHODS; ROCKS; STRAIN; STRESS CONCENTRATION; TUNNELING (EXCAVATION); TUNNELS;

ROCK MASS RATING (RMR);

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY;

NUMERICAL MODEL; ROCK MASS CLASSIFICATION; SUPPORT; TUNNELING;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

EID: 1542749985     PISSN: 00137952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2003.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abad J. Caleda B. Chacon E. Gutierrez V. Hidlgo E. Applications of geomechanical classification to predict the convergence of coal mine galleries and to design their supports 5th Int. Congress on Rock Mech. 1984 15-19 ISRM Melbourne, Australia, (E)
2. Barton N. Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 39 1 2002 185-216
3. Barton N.R. Lien R. Lunde J. Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support Rock Mech. 6 4 1974 189-239
4. Bhasin R. Grimstad E. The use of stress-strength relationships in the assessment of tunnel stability Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 11 1 1996 93-98
5. Bieniawski Z.T. Geomechanics classification of rock masses and its application in tunneling Proc. 3rd Congress Int. Soc. Rock Mech. 1974 27-32 ISRM Denver, USA, VIIA
6. Bieniawski Z.T. Engineering Rock Mass Classifications 1989 251 Wiley New York
7. Can T. Ertunc A. Bilecik-Osmaneli karayolu tunellerinin onsariminda ampirik ve analitik yaklasimlar The 5th National Rock Mechanics Symposium 2000 45-56 Turkish National Rock Mechanics Society (TUKMD) Isparta, Turkey
8. Goel, R.K., 1994. Correlations for predicting support pressures and closures in tunnels. PhD Thesis, Nagpur University, Nagpur, India, p. 308.
9. Goel R.K. Jethwa J.L. Paithankar A.G. Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 10 1 1995 97-109
10. Hoek E. Brown E.T. Practical estimates of rock mass strength Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 34 8 1998 1165-1186
11. ISRM Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring-ISRM Suggested Methods 1981 211 Pergamon Oxford
12. Hoek E. Kaiser P.K. Bawden W.F. Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock 1995 215 Balkema Rotterdam
13. Milne, D., 1988. Suggestion for standardization of rock mass classification. MSc Dissertation, Imperial College, University of London, p. 123.
14. Milne D. Hadjigeorgiou J. Pakalnis R. Rock mass characterization for underground Hard rock mines Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 13 4 1998 383-391
15. Mitri H.S. Edrissi R. Henning J. Finite Element modeling of cable-bolted slopes in hard rock underground mines Presented at the SME Annual Meeting, SME, Albuquerque, 14-17 February, New Mexico, USA 1994 94-116
16. Rocscience A 2D finite element program for calculating stresses and estimating support around the underground excavations 1999 Geomechanics Software and Research, Rocscience Inc. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
17. Ramamurthy T. Stability of rock mass, 8th Annual lecture Indian Geotech. J. 1985 1-74
18. Rutledge, J.C., Preston, R.L., 1978. Experience with engineering classifications of rock for the prediction of tunnel support. Proceedings of the International Tunneling Symposium, Tokyo, pp. A-3-1: 7.
19. Serafim J.L. Pereira J.P. Considerations of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski Proceedings International Symposium Engineering Geology and Underground Construction vol. 1 1983 1133-1142 Balkema Rotterdam
20. Sheorey P.R. Murali M.G. Sinha A. Influence of elastic constants on the horizontal in situ stress Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 38 1 2001 1211-1216
21. Singh B. Viladkar M.N. Samadhiya N.K. Mehrota V.K. Rock mass strength parameters mobilized in tunnels Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 12 1 1997 47-54
22. Verman, M., 1993. Rock mass-tunnel support interaction analysis. PhD Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India.