Flexible process enactment using low-fidelity models

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2003, Pages 675-680

  Noll, John ^a  

^a Santa Clara University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cooperative Work Support; Workflow Modeling

Indexed keywords

COOPERATIVE WORK SUPPORT; WORKFLOW MODELING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; CONSTRAINT THEORY; PROGRAM COMPILERS; PROGRAM DEBUGGING; SPECIFICATIONS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 1542748194     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Paul Dourish. Process descriptions as organizational accounting devices: The dual use of workflow technologies. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pages 52-60, Boulder, Colorado, USA, October 2001. ACM Press.
2. Walt Scacchi and John Noll. Process-driven intranets: Life-cycle support for process engineering. IEEE Internet Computing, September/October 1997.
3. John Noll and Walt Scacchi. Specifying process-oriented hypertext for organizational computing. Journal of Networking and Computer Applications, 24(1), January 2001.
4. John Noll and Bryce Billinger. Modeling coordination as resource flow: An object-based approach. In Proceedings of the 2002 IASTED Conference on Software Engineering Applications, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, November 2002.
5. Alessandra Agostini and Giorgio De Michelis. A light workflow management system using simple process models. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9(3-4):335-363, August 2000.
6. Natalie S. Glance, Daniele S. Pagani, and Remo Pareschi. Generalized process structure grammars (GPSG) for flexible representations of work. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 180-189, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1996. ACM Press.
7. P. Dourish, J. Holmes, A. MacLean, P. Marqvardsen, and A. Zbyslaw. Freeflow: Mediating between representation and action in workflow systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 190-198, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 1996. ACM Press.
8. Burkhard Peuschel and Wilhelm Schäfer. Concepts and implementation of a rule-based process engine. In Proceedings: 14th International Conference on Soft ware Engineering, pages 262-279. IEEE Computer Society Press/ACM Press, 1992.
9. Israel Z. Ben-Shaul, Gail E. Kaiser, and G. Heineman. An architecture for multi-user software development environments. Computing Systems, the Journal of the USENIX Association, 6(2):65-103, 1993.
10. R. Conradi, M. L. Jaccheri, C. Mazzi, M. N. Nguyen, and A. Aarsten. Design, use and implementation of SPELL, a language for software process modelling and evolution. In J.-C. Derniame, editor, Software Process Technology, number 635 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 167-177. Springer-Verlag, 1991.
11. Abraham Bernstein. How can cooperative work tools support dynamic group process? Bridging the specificity frontier. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 279-288, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, 2000. ACM Press.
12. Havard D. Jorgensen. Interaction as a framework for flexible workflow modelling. In Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pages 32-41, Boulder, Colorado, USA, October 2001. ACM Press.