|
|
Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 227-235
|
|
Is publicly funded health care really distributed according to need? The example of cardiac rehabilitation in the UK.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS;
ECONOMICS;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NEEDS ASSESSMENT;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
PUBLIC HOSPITAL;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SEX DIFFERENCE;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
STANDARD;
STATISTICAL MODEL;
STATISTICS;
UNITED KINGDOM;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
EMPIRICAL APPROACH;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
HOSPITALS, PUBLIC;
HUMANS;
LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEEDS ASSESSMENT;
PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
RESOURCE ALLOCATION;
SEX FACTORS;
SOCIAL JUSTICE;
SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;
STATE MEDICINE;
|
|
EID: 1542741115
PISSN: 01688510
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-8510(03)00046-0 Document Type: Erratum |
|
Times cited : (11)
|
|
References (0)
|
