A post-processing/region of interest (ROI) method for discriminating patterns of activity in statistical maps of fMRI data

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Volumn 135, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 137-147

  McKeown, Martin J ^a   Hanlon, Colleen A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; Functional MRI; Regions of interest; Resampling methods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SYSTEM; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SAMPLING; TASK PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 1542723015     PISSN: 01650270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baumgartner R., Ryner L., Richter W., Summers R., Jarmasz M., Somorjai R. Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis. Mag. Res. Imaging. 18(1):2000;89-94.
2. Bhattacharya J., Petsche H., Feldmann U., Rescher B. EEG gamma-band phase synchronization between posterior and frontal cortex during mental rotation in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 311:2001;29-32.
3. Constable R.T., Skudlarski P., Mencl E., Pugh K.R., Fulbright R.K., Lacadie C.et al. Quantifying and comparing region-of-interest activation patterns in functional brain MR imaging: methodology considerations. Mag. Res. Imaging. 16(3):1998;289-300.
4. Cunnington R., Windischberger C., Deecke L., Moser E. The preparation and execution of self-initiated and externally-triggered movement: a study of event-related fMRI. Neuroimage. 15(2):2002;373-385.
5. Damasio H. Human brain anatomy in computerized images. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; January 15, 1995.
6. Deiber M.P., Honda M., Ibanez V., Sadato N., Hallett M. Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. J. Neurophysiol. 81(6):1999;3065-3077.
7. Efron B. The jacknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1982.
8. Flurry. A first course in multivariate statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1997. p. 190-1.
9. Friston KJ. In: Toga AW, Mazziotta JC, editors. Statistical parametric mapping and other analyses of functional imaging data. Brain mapping, the methods. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 363-96.
10. Friston K.J., Ashburner J., Frith C.D., Poline J.B., Heather J.D., Frackowiak R.S.J. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Map. 3(3):1995;165.
11. Gribova A., Donchin O., Bergman H., Vaadia E., Cardoso De Oliveira S. Timing of bimanual movements in human and non-human primates in relation to neuronal activity in primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area. Exp. Brain Res. 146(3):2002;322-335.
12. Gustard S., Fadili J., Williams E.J., Hall L.D., Carpenter T.A., Brett M.et al. Effect of slice orientation on reproducibility of fMRI motor activation at 3. Tesla Mag. Res. Imaging. 19(10):2001;1323-1331.
13. Jenkinson M., Bannister P., Brady J.M., Smith S.M. Improved optimisation for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage. 17(2):2002;825-841.
14. Kermadi I., Liu Y., Tempini A., Rouiller E.M. Effects of reversible inactivation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) on unimanual grasp and bimanual pull and grasp performance in monkeys. Somatosensory Motor Res. 14(4):1997;268-280.
15. Koski L., Iacoboni M., Dubeau M.C., Woods R.P., Mazziotta J.C. Modulation of cortical activity during different imitative behaviors. J. Neurophysiol. 89(1):2003;460-471.
16. Kruggel F., von Cramon D.Y., Descombes X. Comparison of filtering methods for fMRI datasets. Neuroimage. 10(5):1999;530-543.
17. Kustra R., Strother S. Peanalized discriminant analysis of [15]-water PET brain images with prediction error selection of smoothness and regularization hyperparameters. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 20(5):2001;376-387.
18. Lawrie S.M., Buechel C., Whalley H.C., Frith C.D., Friston K.J., Johnstone E.C. Reduced frontotemporal functional connectivity in schizophrenia associated with auditory hallucinations. Biol. Psychiatry. 51(12):2002;1008- 1011.
19. Lukic A.S., Wernick M.N., Strother S.C. An evaluation of methods for detecting brain activations from functional neuroimages. Artif. Intell. Med. 25(1):2002;69-88.
20. McIntosh A., Bookstein F., Haxby J., Grady C. Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares. Neuroimage. 3:1996;143-157.
21. McKeown M.J., Sejnowski T.J. Independent component analysis of fMRI data: examining the assumptions. Hum. Brain Map. 6:1998;368.
22. McKeown M.J., Makeig S., Brown G., Kindermann S., Sejnowski T.J. Modes or models: a critique on independent component analysis for fMRI-reply to commentary by Professor Friston. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2:1998;375.
23. McKeown M.J., Jung T.P., Makeig S., Brown G., Kindermann S.S., Lee T.W. et al. Spatially independent activity patterns in functional MRI data during the stroop color-naming task. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95(3):1998;803.
24. McKeown M.J., Makeig S., Brown G.G., Jung T.P., Kindermann S.S., Bell A.J.et al. Analysis of fMRI data by blind separation into independent spatial components. Hum. Brain Map. 6(3):1998;160.
25. McLachlan G.J. Cluster analysis and related techniques in medical research. Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 1(1):1992;27-48.
26. Nielson K.A., Langenecker S.A., Garavan H. Differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control across the adult life span. J. Article Psychol. Aging. 17(1):2002;56-71.
27. Nixon P.D., Passingham R.E. The striatum and self-paced movements. Behav. Neurosci. 112(3):1998;719-724.
28. Otte M. Elastic registration of fMRI data using Bezier-spline transformations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 20(3):2001;193-206.
29. Passingham R. The frontal lobes and voluntary action. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993.
30. Pelphrey KA, Singerman JD, Allison T, McCarthy G. Brain activation evoked by perception of gaze shifts; The influence of context. Neuropsychologia 2003;41(2):156-70.
31. Romo R., Schultz W. Role of primate basal ganglia and frontal cortex in the internal generation of movements. III. Neuronal activity in the supplementary motor area. Exp. Brain Res. 91:1992;396-407.
32. Salvador S., Brovelli A., Longo R. A simple and fast technique for on-line fMRI data analysis. Mag. Res. Imaging. 20(2):2002;207-213.
33. Seitz R.J., Knorr U., Azari N.P., Herzog H., Freund H.J. Visual network activation in recovery from sensorimotor stroke. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 14(1):1999;25-33.
34. Skudlarski P., Constable R.T., Gore J.C. ROC analysis of statistical methods used in functional MRI: individual subjects. Neuroimage. 9(3):1999;311-329.
35. Ward N.S., Brown M.M., Thompson A.J., Frackowiak R.S. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 126(Pt 11):2003;2476-2496. (Epub 2003 Aug 22).
36. Wessel K., Zeffiro T., Toro C., Hallett M. Self-paced versus metronome paced finger movements: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neuro. Imaging. 7:1997;145-151.
37. Worsley K.J., Friston K.J. Analysis of fMRI time-series-revisited again. Neuroimage. 2:1995;173-181.
38. Worsley K.J., Poline J.B., Friston K., Evans A. Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models. Neuroimage. 6:1997;305-319.