Women, sex, hostility, power, and suspicion: Sexually aggressive men's cognitive associations

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 256-263

  Leibold, Jill M ^a   McConnell, Allen R ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542720842     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00095-7     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barbaree, H. E., & Marshall, W. L. (1991). The role of male sexual arousal in rape: Six models. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 621-630.
2. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power-sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781.
3. Brownmiller, S. (1975). Against our will: Men, women, and rape. New York: Bantam.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
5. Byers, E. S., Purdon, C., & Clark, D. A. (1998). Sexual intrusive thoughts of college students. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 359-369.
6. Campbell, A. (1993). Women, men, and aggression. New York: Basic Books.
7. Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1997). Nonconscious behavioral confirmation processes: The self-fulfilling consequences of automatic stereotype activation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 541-560.
8. Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 25, 257-271.
9. Dunton, B. C., & Fazio, R. H. (1997). An individual difference measure of motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 316-326.
10. Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In R. M. Sorrentino, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 204-243). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick, & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
12. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty, & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (Vol. 4, pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
14. Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior process. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 97-116). New York: Guilford Press.
15. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Hall, G. C. N., & Hirschman, R. (1991). Toward a theory of sexual aggression: A quadripartite model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 662-669.
17. Higgins, E. T., King, G. A., & Mavin, G. H. (1982). Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 35-47.
18. Leibold, J. M., & McConnell, A. R. (2002). The consequences of powerlessness on aggression and on attraction toward women by sexually aggressive men. Manuscript under review.
19. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704-711.
20. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.
21. Malamuth, N. M. (1989a). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part 1. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 26-49.
22. Malamuth, N. M. (1989b). The attraction to sexual aggression scale: Part 2. The Journal of Sex Research, 26, 324-354.
23. Malamuth, N. M., & Brown, L. M. (1994). Sexually aggressive men's perceptions of women's communications: Testing three explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 699-712.
24. Malamuth, N. M., Linz, D., Heavey, C. L., Barnes, G., & Acker, M. (1995). Using the confluence model of sexual aggression to predict men's conflict with women: A 10-year follow-up study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 353-369.
25. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., & Tanaka, J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670-681.
26. McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 435-442.
27. Muehlenhard, C. L., Danoff-Burg, S., & Powch, I. G. (1996). Is rape sex or violence? Conceptual issues and implications. In D. M. Buss, & N. M. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (pp. 119-137). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
29. Palmer, C. T. (1988). Twelve reasons why rape is not sexually motivated: A skeptical examination. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 512-530.
30. Pithers, W. D., Beal, L. S., Armstrong, J., & Petty, J. (1989). Identification of risk factors through clinical interviews and analysis of records. In D. R. Laws (Ed.), Relapse prevention with sex offenders (pp. 77-87). New York: Guilford Press.
31. Rapaport, K., & Burkhart, B. R. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216-221.
32. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
33. Shea, M. E. (1993). The effects of selective evaluation on the perception of female cues in sexually coercive and noncoercive males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 415-433.
34. Shotland, R. L., & Craig, J. M. (1988). Can men and women differentiate between friendly and sexually interested behavior? Social Psychology Quarterly, 51, 66-73.
35. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220-232.
36. Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice - toward a social contingency-model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 331-376.
37. US Department of Justice (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: Author.