|
Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 17-20
|
Research involving the homeless: arguments against payment-in-kind (PinK).
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
ECONOMICS;
ETHICS;
FEE;
HOMELESSNESS;
HUMAN;
HUMAN EXPERIMENT;
MOTIVATION;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION;
RESEARCH SUBJECT;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
THEFT;
VULNERABLE POPULATION;
BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;
COERCION;
FEES AND CHARGES;
HOMELESS PERSONS;
HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION;
HUMANS;
MOTIVATION;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
RESEARCH SUBJECTS;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
THEFT;
VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;
|
EID: 1542715657
PISSN: 01937758
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.2307/3564602 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (0)
|