Can homo economicus follow Kant's categorical imperative?

Journal of Socio-Economics

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 89-106

  White, Mark D ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Categorical imperative; Commitment; Duty; Kant; Rational choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542714560     PISSN: 10535357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2003.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Becker G.S. Crime and punishment: an economic approach Journal of Political Economy 76 1968 169-217
2. Becker, G.S., 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Becker, G.S., 1996. Accounting for Tastes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Brandt, R.B., 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Prometheus Books, Amherst, NY.
5. Brennan T.J. A methodological assessment of multiple utility frameworks Economics and Philosophy 5 1989 189-208
6. Brennan T.J. The futility of multiple utility Economics and Philosophy 9 1993 155-164
7. Broome J. Deontology and economics Economics and Philosophy 8 1992 269-282
8. Cummiskey, D., 1996. Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Elster, J., 1979. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
10. Elster J. Social norms and economic theory Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 1989 99-117
11. Etzioni A. The case for a multiple-utility conception Economics and Philosophy 2 1986 159-184
12. Etzioni A. Toward a Kantian socio-economics Review of Social Economy 45 1987 37-47
13. Etzioni, A., 1988. The Moral Dimension: Toward a New Economics. The Free Press, New York.
14. Frank R.H. If homo economicus could choose his own utility function, would he want one with a conscience? American Economic Review 77 1987 593-604
15. Frank, R.H., 1988. Passions Within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. W.W. Norton and Company, New York.
16. Gaus G.F. What is deontology? Part One. Orthodox views The Journal of Value Inquiry 35 2001a 27-42
17. Gaus G.F. What is deontology? Part Two. Reasons to act The Journal of Value Inquiry 35 2001b 179-193
18. George, D., 2001. Preference Pollution: How Markets Create the Desires We Dislike. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
19. Goldfarb, R.S., Griffith W.B., 1991. Amending the economist's 'rational egoist' model to include moral values and norms. Part 2. Alternative solutions. In: Koford, Miller (Eds.). Social Norms and Economic Institutions. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
20. Gregor, M.J., 1963. Laws of Freedom: A Study of Kant's Method of Applying the Categorical Imperative in the Metaphysik der Sitten. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
21. Griffin, J., 1986. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
22. Guyer P. Ends of reason and ends of nature: the place of teleology in Kant's ethics The Journal of Value Inquiry 36 2002 161-186
23. Kant, I., 1785. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis (J.W. Ellington, Trans.).
24. Kant, I., 1788. Critique of Practical Reason, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (L.W. Beck, Trans. and Ed.).
25. Kant, I., 1797. The Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (M. Gregor, Trans. and Ed.).
26. Koford, K.J., Miller, J.B., (Eds.), 1991. Social Norms and Economic Institutions. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
27. Kuran, T., 1998. Moral overload and its alleviation. In: Ben-Ner, A., Putterman, L. (Eds.), Economics, Values, and Organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 231-266.
28. Lutz M.A. The utility of multiple utility: a comment on Brennan Economics and Philosophy 9 1993 145-154
29. Minkler L. The problem with utility: toward a non-consequentialist/utility theory synthesis Review of Social Economy 57 1999 4-24
30. Murphy, J.G., 1970. Kant: The Philosophy of Right. Mercer University Press, Macon, GA (1994) (reprint).
31. Paton, H.J., 1947. The Categorical Imperative: A Study in Kant's Moral Philosophy. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
32. Rabin, M., 1995. Moral Preferences, Moral Constraints, and Self-Serving Biases. University of California at Berkeley Working Paper.
33. Roth, T.P., 1999. Ethics, Economics and Freedom: The Failure of Consequentialist Social Welfare Theory. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK.
34. Schmidtz D. Choosing ends Ethics 104 1994 226-251
35. Schmidtz, D., 1995. Rational Choice and Moral Agency. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
36. Sen, A., 1977. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. In: Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 6. pp. 317-344 (reprinted in Sen, 1982) (Chapter 4).
37. Sullivan, R.J., 1989. Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
38. Sullivan, R.J., 1994. An Introduction to Kant's Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
39. van Staveren, I., 2001. The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. Routledge, London.
40. Walsh, V., 1996. Rationality, Allocation, and Reproduction. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
41. Ward K. Kant's teleological ethics Philosophical Quarterly 21 1971 337-351
42. White, M.D. (Forthcoming). A social economics of crime (based on Kantian ethics). In: M. Oppenheimer, N. Mercuro,  Law & Economics: Alternative Economic Approaches to Legal and Regulatory Issue. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY.