Audiometric correlates of the unaided APHAB

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 361-371

  Cox, Robyn M ^a,b,c   Alexander, Genevieve C ^a,b   Gray, Ginger A ^b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

^c Memphis Speech and Hearing Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Hearing loss; Speech intelligibility; Subjective outcomes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING AID; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS;

EID: 1542679504     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ANSI. (1996). American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: ANSI.
2. Brainerd SH, Frankel BG. (1985). The relationship between audiometric and self-report measures of hearing handicap. Ear Hear 6:89-92.
3. Coren S, Hakstian AR. (1992). The development and cross-validation of a self-report inventory to assess pure-tone threshold hearing sensitivity. J Speech Hear Res 35:921-928.
4. Cox RM. (1997). Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J 50:32-48.
5. Cox RM, Alexander GC. (1995). The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear Hear 16:176-86.
6. Cox RM, Alexander GC, Gray GA. (1999). Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 10:1-13.
7. Cox RM, Gray GA, Alexander GC. (2001). Evaluation of a Revised Speech in Noise (RSIN) test. J Am Acad Audiol 12:423-433.
8. Dobie RA, Sakai CS. (2001). Estimation of hearing loss severity from the audiogram. In: Henderson D, Prasher D, Salvi RJ, Kopke R, Hamernik R, eds. Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Basic Mechanisms, Prevention and Control. London: NRN Publishers, 351-363.
9. Hawes NA, Niswander PS. (1985). Comparison of the Revised Hearing Performance Inventory with audiometric measures. Ear Hear 6:93-97.
10. Killion MC, Niquette PA. (2000). What can the puretone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss? Hear J 53:46-53.
11. Killion MC, Villchur E. (1993). Kessler was right-partly: But SIN test shows some aids improve hearing in noise. Hear J 46:31-35.
12. Kochkin S. (1998). MarkeTrak IV: Correlates of hearing aid purchase intent. Hear J 51:30-41.
13. Koike KJ, Hurst MK, Wetmore SJ. (1994). Correlation between the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Hearing and Neck Surgery five-minute hearing test and standard audiologic data. J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 111:625-632.
14. Kramer SE, Kapteyn TS, Festen JM, Tobi H. (1996). The relationships between self-reported hearing disability and measures of auditory disability.Audiol 35:277-287.
15. Lutman ME, Brown EJ, Coles RRA. (1987). Self-reported disability and handicap in the population in relation to pure-tone threshold, age, sex, and type of hearing loss. Br J Audiol 21:45-58.
16. McCartney JH, Maurer JF, Sorenson FD. (1976). A comparison of the Hearing Handicap Scale and the Hearing Measurement Scale with standard audiometric measures on a geriatric population. J Auditory Res 16:51-58.
17. Nabelek AK, Mason D. (1981). Effect of noise and reverberation on binaural and monaural word identification by subjects with various audiograms. J Speech Hear Res 24:375-383
18. Siegenthaler BM, Strand R. (1964). Audiogramaverage methods and SRT scores. J Acoust Soc Am 36:589-595.
19. Studebaker GA. (1985). A "rationalized" arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 28:255-262.
20. Weinstein BE, Ventry IM. (1983). Audiometric correlates of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. J Speech Hear Disord 48:379-384.