Three-Dimensional Surgical Planning for Maxillary and Midface Distraction Osteogenesis

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 833-839

  Gateno, Jaime ^a   Teichgraeber, John F ^a   Xia, James J ^a  

^a Division of Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted; Distraction osteogenesis; Maxilla; Midface; Surgical planning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROUZON SYNDROME; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; FACIAL BONE; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMAN; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; MAXILLA OSTEOTOMY; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOTOMY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHILD; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRANIOFACIAL DYSOSTOSIS; FACIAL BONES; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAXILLA; MODELS, ANATOMIC; OPEN BITE; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; OSTEOTOMY; OSTEOTOMY, LE FORT; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 1542653336     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: 15363732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200311000-00004     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Gateno J, Allen ME, Teichgraeber JF, et al. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58:985-991
2. Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Aguilar E. Distraction osteogenesis: a new surgical technique for use with the multiplanar mandibular distractor. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:883-888
3. Gateno J, Teichgraeber JF, Aguilar E. Computer planning for distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:873-882
4. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Rigid external distraction: its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102:1360-1374
5. Polley JW, Figueroa AA. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg 1997; 8:181-186
6. Chin M, Toth BA. Le Fort III advancement with gradual distraction using internal devices. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100:819-832
7. Cohen SR, Burstein FD, Williams JK. The role of distraction osteogenesis in the management of craniofacial disorders. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999; 28:728-738
8. Posnick JC. The craniofacial dysostosis syndromes. Current reconstructive strategies. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21:585-598
9. Ortiz-Monasterio F, del Campo AF, Carrillo A. Advancement of the orbits and the midface in one piece, combined with frontal repositioning, for the correction of Crouzon's deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61:507-516
10. Rachmiel A, Potparic Z, Jackson IT, et al. Midface advancement by gradual distraction. Br J Plast Surg 1993; 46:201-207
11. Toth BA, Kim JW, Chin M, et al. Distraction osteogenesis and its application to the midface and bony orbit in craniosynostosis syndromes. J Craniofac Surg 1998; 9:100-122
12. Cohen SR. Midface distraction. Semin Orthod 1999; 5:52-58
13. Gosain AK. Distraction osteogenesis of the craniofacial skeleton. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107:278-280
14. Pai L, Kohout MP, Mulliken JB. Prospective anthropometric analysis of sagittal orbital-globe relationship following fronto-orbital advancement in childhood. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103:1341-1346
15. Wong GB, Kakulis EG, Mulliken JB. Analysis of fronto-orbital advancement for Apert, Crouzon, Pfeiffer, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105:2314-2323
16. Motoki DS, Altobelli DE, Mulliken JB. Enophthalmos following orbital transposition for craniofacial malformations. Plast Reconstr Surg 1993; 91:416-428
17. Fearon JA. The Le Fort III osteotomy: to distract or not to distract? Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107:1091-1106