Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system V: Within-plant dynamics of Phytoseiulus persimilis and Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae)

Experimental and Applied Acarology

Volumn 29, Issue 1-2, 2003, Pages 35-68

  Nachman, Gösta ^a   Zemek, Rostislav ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b INSTITUTE OF ENTOMOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Biological control; Bottom up factor; Phytoseiulus persimilis; Plant condition; Predacious mites; Simulation model; Tetranychus urticae; Top down factor; Two spotted spider mites

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; BOTTOM-UP CONTROL; MITE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; TOP-DOWN CONTROL; TRITROPHIC INTERACTION;

ACARI; ARANEAE; PHASEOLUS (ANGIOSPERM); PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS; TETRANYCHIDAE; TETRANYCHUS; TETRANYCHUS URTICAE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; LEGUME; PARASITOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; TETRANYCHIDAE;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FABACEAE; FEMALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TETRANYCHIDAE;

EID: 1542647259     PISSN: 01688162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024273327807     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bancroft J.S. and Margolies D.C. 1999. An individual-based model of an acarine tritrophic system: lima bean, Phaseolus lunatus L., twospotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae), and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Ecol. Model. 123: 161-181.
2. Begon M., Harper J.L. and Townsend C.R. 1996. Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities. Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1068 pp.
3. Bernstein C. 1984. Prey and predator emigration responses in the acarine system Tetranychus urticae- Phytoseiulus persimilis. Oecologia 61: 134-142, (Berlin).
4. Bernstein C. 1985. A simulation model for an acarine predator-prey system (Phytoseiulus persimilis- Tetranychus urticae). J. Anim. Ecol. 54: 375-389.
5. Burnett T. 1979. An acarine predator-prey population infesting roses. Res. Popul. Ecol. 20: 227-234.
6. Carey J.R. 1983. Practical application of the stable age distribution: Analysis of a tetranychid mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) population outbreak. Environ. Entomol. 12: 10-18.
7. Easterbrook M.A. 1992. The possibilities for control of two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae on field-grown strawberries in the UK by predatory mites. Biocontrol Science and Technology 2: 235-245.
8. Eveleigh E.S. and Chant D.A. 1982a. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: the effects of predator density on prey consumption, predator searching efficiency, and the functional response to prey density (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 60: 611-629.
9. Eveleigh E.S. and Chant D.A. 1982b. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: the response to prey distribution in a homogeneous area (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 60: 639-647.
10. Eveleigh E.S. and Chant D.A. 1982c. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: the distribution of search effort and the functional and numerical responses of predators in a patchy environment (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 60: 2979-2991.
11. Eveleigh E.S. and Chant D.A. 1982d. Experimental studies on acarine predator-prey interactions: distribution of search effort and predation rates of a predator population in a patchy environment (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Can. J. Zool. 60: 3001-3009.
12. Everson O. 1979. The functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to various densities of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Can. Entomol. 111: 7-10.
13. Fernando M.H.J.P. and Hassell M.P. 1980. Predator-prey responses in an acarine system. Res. Popul. Ecol. 27: 301-322.
14. Force D.C. 1967. Effect of temperature on biological control of two-spotted spider mites by Phytoseiulus persimilis. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 1308-1311.
15. French N., Parr W.J., Gould H.J., Williams J.J. and Simmonds S.P. 1976. Development of biological methods for the control of Tetranychus urticae on tomatoes using Phytoseiulus persimilis. Ann. appl. Biol. 83: 177-189.
16. Gerson U. 1979. Silk production in Tetranychus (Acari: Tetranychidae). In: Rodriguez J.G. (ed.), Recent Advances in Acarology. Vol. I. Academic Press, New York, pp. 177-188.
17. Gough N. 1991. Long-term stability in the interaction between Tetranychus urticae and Phytoseiulus persimilis producing successful integrated control on roses in southeast Queensland. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 12: 83-101.
18. Gould H.J. 1970. Preliminary studies on an integrated control programme for cucumber pests and an evaluation of methods of introducing Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot for the control of Tetranychus urticae. Koch. Ann. Appl. Biol. 66: 505-513.
19. Hartvigsen G., Wait D.A. and Coleman J.S. 1995. Tri-trophic interactions influenced by resource availability: predator effects on plant performance depend on plant resources. Oikos 74: 463-468.
20. Harrison S. and Taylor A.D. 1997. Empirical evidence for metapopulation dynamics. In: Hanski I. and Gilpin M.E. (eds), Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 27-42.
21. Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. 1985. Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Vol. 1B. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
22. Hocking R.R. 1976. The analysis and selection of variables in linear regression. Biometrics 32: 1-49.
23. Holling C.S. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91: 385-398.
24. Hussey N.W. and Parr W.J. 1963. The effect of the glasshouse red spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acarina, Tetranychidae) on the yield of cucumbers. J. hort. Sci. 38: 255-263.
25. Hussey N.W., Parr W.J. and Gould H.J. 1965. Observations on the control of Tetranychus urticae Koch on cucumbers by the predatory mite Phytoseiulus riegeli Dosse. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 8: 271-281.
26. Ivlev V.S. 1961. Experimental Ecology of the Feeding of Fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven.
27. Janssen A. and Sabelis M.W. 1992. Phytoseiid life-histories, local predator-prey dynamics, and strategies for control of tetranychid mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 14: 233-250.
28. Kaiser H. 1983. Small scale spatial heterogeniety influences predation success in an unexpected way: Model experiments on the functional response of predatory mites (Acarina). Oecologia 56: 249-256.
29. Krishnamurty G.B., Kasovia-Schmitt P. and Ostroff D.J. 1994. Statistics. An interactive text for the health and life sciences. Jones and Bartletts Publishers, Boston.
30. Kuchlein J.H. 1966. Mutual interference among the predacious mite Typhlodromus longipilus Nesbitt (Acari, Phytoseiidae) I. Effects of predator density on oviposition rate and migration tendency. Meded. Rijksfac. Landbouwwet. Gent. 31: 740-746.
31. Lei G.C. and Hanski I. 1997. Metapopulation structure of Cotesia melitaearum, a specialist parasitoid of the butterfly Melitaea cinxia. Oikos 78: 91-100.
32. McCauley E., Kendall B.E., Janssen A., Wood S., Murdoch W.W., Hosseini P. et al. 2000. Inferring colonization processes from population dynamics in spatially structured predator-prey systems. Ecology 81: 3350-3361.
33. Murdoch W.W. and Briggs C.J. 1996. Theory for biological control: Recent developments. Ecology 77: 2001-2013.
34. Nachman G. 1974. Principles of biological control of the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch by means of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot examined by means of modeling and laboratory experiments. M.Sc., Univ. of Copenhagen, (in Danish) (unpublished).
35. Nachman G. 1981. Temporal and spatial dynamics of an acarine predator-prey system. J. Anim. Ecol. 50: 435-451.
36. Nachman G. 1999. The effect of dispersal on the dynamics and persistence of an acarine predator-prey system in a patchy environment. In: Needham G.R., Mitchell R., Horn D.J. and Welbourn W.C. (eds), Acarology IX, Symposia. Vol. 2. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 175-184.
37. Nachman G. 2001. Predator-prey interactions in a non-equilibrium context: the metapopulation approach to modeling "hide-and-seek" dynamics in a spatially explicit tri-trophic system. Oikos 94: 72-88.
38. Nachman G. and Zemek R. 2002a. Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system III: Effects of Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae) on host plant condition. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 26: 27-42.
39. Nachman G. and Zemek R. 2002b. Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system IV: Effects of host plant condition on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 26: 43-70.
40. Oaten A. 1977. Transit time and density-dependent predation on a patchily distributed prey. Am. Natur. 111: 1061-1075.
41. Oatman E.R., McMurtry J.A., Shorey H.H. and Voth V. 1967. Studies on integrating Phytoseiulus persimilis releases, chemical applications, cultural manipulations, and natural predation for control of the two-spotted spider mite on strawberry in southern California. J. Econ. Entomol. 60: 1344-1351.
42. Ohnesorge B. 1981. Populationsdynamische Untersuchungen in einem Räuber-Beutetier-System: Phytoseilus persimilis A.-H. (Acarina, Phytoseiidae) und Tetranychus urticae Koch. Z. ang. Ent. 91: 25-49.
43. Partridge L. 1989. Lifetime reproductive success and life-history evolution. In: Newton I. (ed.), Lifetime Reproduction in Birds. Academic Press, London, pp. 421-140.
44. Pels B. and Sabelis M.W. 1999. Local dynamics, overexploitation and predator dispersal in an acarine predator-prey system. Oikos 86: 573-583.
45. Ricker W.E. 1973. Linear regressions in fishery research. J. Fisheries Research Board of Canada 30: 409-434.
46. Sabelis M.W. 1985. Capacity for population increase. In: Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. (eds), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 35-41.
47. Sabelis M.W. and Dicke M. 1985. Long-range dispersal and searching behaviour. In: Helle W. and Sabelis M.W. (eds), Spider Mites, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 141-160.
48. th printing.
49. Siegel S. and Castellan N.J. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill. New York, 399 pp.
50. Sokal R.R. and Rohlf F.J. 1995. Biometry. 3rd edn. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York, 887 pp.
51. Stenseth C. 1979. Effect of temperature and humidity on the development of Phytoseiulus persimilis and its ability to regulate populations of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae). Entomophaga 24: 311-317.
52. Takafuji A. and Chant D.A. 1976. Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey. Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255-310.
53. van Baalen M. and Sabelis M.W. 1995. The milker-killer dilemma in spatially structured predator-prey interactions. Oikos 74: 391-400.
54. Walde S.J. 1994. Immigration and the dynamics of a predator-prey interaction in biological control. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 337-346.
55. Walde S.J. and Nachman G. 1999. Dynamics of spatially structured spider mite populations. In: Hawkins B.A. and Cornell H.V. (eds), Theoretical Approaches to Biological Control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 163-189.
56. Zemek R. and Nachman G. 1998. Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system: effects of Tetranychus urticae on the dispersal rates of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 22: 259-278.
57. Zemek R. and Nachman G. 1999. Interactions in a tritrophic acarine predator-prey metapopulation system: prey location and distance moved by Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 21-40.