On relations between perceiving, imagining and performing in the learning of cyclical movement sequences

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 191-216

  Vogt, Stefan ^a,b  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542638812     PISSN: 20448295     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1995.tb02556.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41-74.
2. Annett, J. (1985). Motor learning: A review. In H. Heuer, U. Kleinbeck & K.-H. Schmidt (Eds), Motor Behavior: Programming, Control, and Acquisition, pp. 189-212. Berlin: Springer.
3. Annett, J. (1991). Skill acquisition. In J. E. Morrison (Ed.), Training for Performance: Principles of Applied Human Learning, pp. 13-51. Chichester: Wiley.
4. Annett, J. & Kay, H. (1957). Knowledge of results and 'skilled performance'. Occupational Psychology, 31, 69-79.
5. Aschersleben, G. & Prinz, W. (1995). Synchronizing actions with events: The role of sensory information. Perception and Psychophysics, 57 (in press).
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Reprinted in H. T. A. Whiting (Ed.) (1984). Human Motor Actions - Bernstein Reassessed. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
8. Bernstein, N. A. (1967). The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Reprinted in H. T. A. Whiting (Ed.) (1984). Human Motor Actions - Bernstein Reassessed. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
9. Carroll, W. R. & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 85-97.
10. Darling, W. G. & Cooke, J. D. (1987). Changes in the variability of movement trajectories with practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 291-309.
11. Decety, J. & Ingvar, D. H. (1990). Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: A neuropsychological interpretation. Acta Psychologica, 73, 13-34.
12. Farah, M. (1988). Is visual imagery really visual? Overlooked evidence from neuropsychology. Psychological Review, 95, 307-317.
13. Feltz, D. L. & Landers, D. M. (1983). The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport Psychology, 5, 25-57.
14. Feltz, D. L., Landers, D. M. & Becker, B. J. (1988). A Revised Meta-analysis of the Mental Practice Literature on Motor Skill Learning (background paper prepared for the Committee on Techniques for the Enhancement of Human Performance). Washington, DC: National Academy Press (Publication-on-Demand Program).
15. Finke, R. A. (1979). The functional equivalence of mental images and errors of movement. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 235-264.
16. Finke, R. A. & Shepard, R. N. (1986). Visual functions of mental imagery. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman & J. P. Thomas (Eds), Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, vol. 2, ch. 37, pp. 1-55. New York: Wiley.
17. Fitts, P. M. & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
18. Franks, I. M. & Romanow, S. K. E. (1993). Task specificity and the role of vision while learning to track. Human Performance, 6, 101-114.
19. Greenhouse, S. W. & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
20. Heuer, H. (1989). A multiple-representations' approach to mental practice of motor skills. In B. Kirkcably (Ed.), Normalities and abnormalities in human movement. Medical Sport Sciences, 29, 36-57.
21. Hinshaw, K. E. (1991). The effects of mental practice on motor skill performance: Critical evaluation and meta-analysis. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 11, 3-35.
22. Howard, J. H. Jr, Mutter, S. A. & Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1029-1039.
23. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245.
24. Johnson, P. (1982). The functional equivalence of imagery and movement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34A, 349-365.
25. Keele, S. W. (1987). Sequencing and timing in skilled perception and action: An overview. In A. Allport, D. G. MacKay, W. Prinz & E. Scheerer (Eds), Language Perception and Production, pp. 463-478. London: Academic Press.
26. Keele, S. W., Cohen, A. & Ivry, R. I. (1990). Motor programs: Concepts and issues. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control, pp. 77-110. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Keele, S. W. & Ivry, R. I. (1987). Modular analysis of timing in motor skill. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 21, pp. 183-228. San Diego. CA: Academic Press.
28. Kohl, R. M. & Shea, C. H. (1992). Pew (1966) revisited: Acquisition of hierarchical control as a function of observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 247-260.
29. Liberman, A. M. & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1-36.
30. Littell, R. C., Freund, R. J. & Spector, P. C. (1991). SAS System for Linear Models, 3rd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
31. McCullagh, P., Weiss, M. R. & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 17, 475-513.
32. MacKay, D. G. (1981). The problem of rehearsal or mental practice, Journal of Motor Behavior, 13, 274-285.
33. Magill, R. A. & Hall, K. G. (1990). A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition. Human Movement Science, 9, 241-289.
34. Michaels, C. F. & Carello, C. (1981). Direct Perception. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
35. Neisser, U. (1985). The role of invariant structures in the control of movement. In M. Frese & J. Sabini (Eds), Goal-directed Behavior: The Concept of Action in Psychology, pp. 97-108. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Neumann, O. & Prinz, W. (Eds). (1990). Relationships between Perception and Action: Current Approaches. Berlin: Springer.
37. Pew, R. W. (1984). A distributed processing view of human motor control. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds), Cognition and Motor Processes, pp. 19-27. Berlin: Springer.
38. Pribram, K. H. (1971). Languages of the Brain: Experimental Paradoxes and Principles in Neuropsychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
39. Prinz, W. (1987). Ideo-motor action. In H. Heuer & A. F. Sanders (Eds), Perspectives on Perception and Action, pp. 47-76. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Prinz, W. (1992). Why don't we perceive our brain states? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1-20.
41. Prinz, W. (1994). Motor images are action plans (Commentary on Jeannerod, 1994). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 218.
42. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1987). Successive approximations to a model of human motor programming. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 21, pp. 153-182. New York: Academic Press.
43. Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991). Human Motor Control. New York: Academic Press.
44. Rosenbaum, D. A., Kenny, S. B. & Derr, M. A. (1983). Hierarchical control of rapid movement sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 86-102.
45. Rosenthal, R. & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast Analysis: Focused Comparisons in the Analysis of Variance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A. & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 355-386.
47. Scheerer, E. (1984). Motor theories of cognitive structure: A historical review. In W. Prinz & A. F. Sanders (Eds), Cognition and Motor Processes, pp. 77-98. Berlin: Springer.
48. Schmidt, R. A. (1988). Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
49. Shaw, R. E., Flascher, O. M. & Mace, W. M. (1995). Dimensions of event perception. In W. Prinz & B. Bridgeman (Eds), Handbook of Perception and Action, vol. 1, Perception. New York: Academic Press (in press).
50. Shepard, R. N. (1984). Ecological constraints on internal representation: Resonant kinematics of perceiving, imaging, thinking, and dreaming. Psychological Review, 91, 417-447.
51. Summers, J. J. (1989). Motor programs. In D. H. Holding (Ed.), Human Skills, 2nd ed., pp. 49-69. Chichester: Wiley.
52. Viviani, P. & Stucchi, N. (1992). Motor-perceptual interactions. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds), Tutorials in Motor Behavior II, pp. 229-248. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
53. Vogt, S. (1991). Invariantenbildung im Reproduktionsversuch - ein empirischer Ansatz zu Genese und Struktur bewegungsleitender Repräsentationen. In R. Daugs, H. Mechling, K. Blischke & N. Olivier (Eds), Sportmotorisches Lernen und Techniktraining, vol. 2, p. 87-93. Schorndorf: Hofmann.
54. Vogt, S. (1992). Serial Order as a Parallel Articulation of Lower-order Invariants: A Test of the Attractor Switching Model. (Paper 10/1992). Munich: Max-Planck-Institute for Psychological Research.
55. Vogt. S. (1994). Imagery needs preparation too (Commentary on Jeannerod, 1994). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 226-227.
56. Vogt, S. & Kay, B. A. (1992). Studies on serial order II: Cognitive aspects and parameter dynamics. Paper presented at the 2nd European Conference on Ecological Psychology, Glasgow.
57. Vogt, S., Stadler, M. & Kruse, P. (1988). Self-organization aspects in the temporal formation of movement gestalts. Human Movement Science, 7, 365-406.
58. Wehner, T., Vogt, S. & Stadler, M. (1984). Task-specific EMG-charactenstics during mental training. Psychological Research, 46, 389-401.
59. Weimer, W. B. (1977). A conceptual framework for cognitive psychology: Motor theories of the mind. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 267-311. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
60. Whiting, H. T. A. (1987). A 'cog' in the 'motor' or a spanner in the works? European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 7, 204-210.
61. Whiting, H. T. A. & den Brinker, B. P. L. M. (1982). Image of the act. In J. P. Das, R. F. Mulcahy & A. E. Wall (Eds), Theory and Research in Learning Disabilities, pp. 217-235. New York: Plenum Press.
62. Whiting, H. T. A., Vogt, S. & Vereijken, B. (1992). Human skill and motor control: Some aspects of the motor control-motor learning relation. In J. J. Summers (Ed.), Approaches to the Study of Motor Control and Learning, pp. 81-111. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
63. Wiesendanger, M. (1990). The motor cortical areas and the problem of hierarchies. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control, pp. 59-75. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Wright, C. E. (1990). Generalized motor programs: Reexamining claims of effector independence in writing. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control, pp. 294-320. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A. & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
66. Young, D. E. & Schmidt, R. A. (1992). Augmented feedback for enhanced skill acquisition. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds), Tutorials in Motor Behavior II, pp. 677-693. Amsterdam: North-Holland.