Families' perceptions of the ability to pay for early intervention services

Journal of Early Intervention

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 164-172

  Shannon, Patrick ^a,d   Grinde, Lisa R ^b   Cox, Ann W ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b LORAS COLLEGE   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD HEALTH CARE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FAMILY; FAMILY HEALTH; HUMAN; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1542616701     PISSN: 10538151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105381510302500302     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Akers, A. L., & Roberts, R. N. (1999). The use of blended and flexible funding in Part C programs at the community level. Infants and Young Children, 11(4), 46-52.
2. Brown, C. W., Perry, D. F., & Kurland, S. (1994). Funding policies that affect children: What every early interventionist should know. Infants and Young Children, 6(4), 1-12.
3. Buck, D., Uhl, M., & Yoder, T. (2000). Optimizing financial resources for family-centered services: A guide for Local Interagency Coordinating Councils in Virginia (2nd ed.). Richmond, VA: Virginia Institute for Developmental Disabilities.
4. Commonwealth of Virginia. Policies and Procedures for Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, Code of Virginia, Title 2. 1 § 7.45-7.43 (1998).
5. Eiserman, W. D., Weber, C., & McCoun, M. (1995). Parent and professional roles in early intervention: A longitudinal comparison of the effects of two intervention configurations. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 20-44.
6. Erickson, M. (1992). An analysis of early intervention expenditures in Massachusetts. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 617-629.
7. Erickson-Warfield, M. (1994). A cost-effectiveness analysis of early intervention services in Massachusetts: Implications for policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 76(1), 87-99.
8. Erickson-Warfield, M. (1995). The cost-effectiveness of home visiting versus group services in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 130-148.
9. Escobar, C. M., Barnett, W. S., & Goetze, L. D. (1994). Cost analysis in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 18, 48-63.
10. Glascoe, F. P., Foster, E. M., & Wolraich, M. L. (1997). An economic analysis of developmental detection methods. Pediatrics, 99, 830-838.
11. Goetze, L. D., Andrews, S. D., & Greer, M. (1999). Financing early intervention services: Perspectives and practicalities from the community level. In R. N. Roberts & P. R. Magrab (Eds.), Where children live: Solutions for serving young children and their families (pp. 97-132). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
12. Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.). (1997). Second-generation research in the field of early intervention. The effectiveness of early intervention (pp. 3-20). Baltimore: Brookes.
13. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
14. Jackson, L. L. (1998). Who's paying for therapy in early intervention? Infants and Young Children, 77(2), 65-72.
15. Kates, D. A. (1997). Funding context for early intervention. In S. K. Thurman, J. R. Cornwell & S. R. Gottwald (Eds.), Contexts of early intervention: Systems and settings (pp. 39-54). Baltimore: Brookes.
16. Kates, D. A. (1998). Constructing an interagency funding system for early intervention services. Infants and Young Children, 77(2), 73-81.
17. Kochanek, T. T., & Costa, C. H. (1997). A multisite, cost analysis of early intervention services (Report No. BBB32942). Providence, RI: Early Childhood Research Institute on Service Utilization. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED410716)
18. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. McWilliam, R. A., & Scott, S. (2001). A support approach to early intervention: A three-part framework. Infants and Young Children, 13(4), 55-66.
21. Roberts, R. N., Innocenti, M. S., & Goetze, L. D. (1999). Emerging issues from state level evaluations of early intervention programs. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 152-163.
22. Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1999). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Shannon, P. (in press). Barriers to family-centered services. Social Work.
24. Striffler, N., Perry, D. F., & Kates, D. A. (1997). Planning and implementing a finance system for early intervention services. Infants and Young Children, 70(2), 57-65.
25. Taylor, M. J., White, K. R., & Kusmierek, A. (1993). The cost-effectiveness of increasing hours per week of early intervention services for young children with disabilities. Early Education and Development, 4, 238-255.
26. Virginia Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation, and Substance Abuse Services (2001). Commonwealth of Virginia Application for Continued Funding under Part C of IDEA: Ability to pay practices. Richmond, VA: Author.
27. White, K. R., & Boyce, G. C. (Eds.). (1993). Comparative evaluations of early intervention alternatives [Special issue]. Early Education and Development, 4(4).