Local thermodynamic derivation of Young's equation

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

Volumn 272, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 420-429

  Roura, P ^a   Fort, Joaquim ^a  

^a GRMT   (Spain)

Author keywords

Contact angle; Surface tension; Young's equation

Indexed keywords

CONTACT ANGLE; ELASTIC MODULI; GRAVITATION; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; SURFACE TENSION; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES;

COMPRESSIVE FLUIDS; GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS;

COLLOIDS;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION; CONTACT ANGLE; ENERGY BALANCE; GEOMETRY; GRAVITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMODYNAMICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1542604129     PISSN: 00219797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Young T. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. 95:1805;65.
2. Gauss K.F. Comment. Soc. Regiae. Scient. Gottingensis Rec. 7:1830;. reprinted in Werke, vol. 5, Gottingen, 1876, p. 29 (in Latin).
3. Gibbs J.W. The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs, vol. I, Thermodynamics. 1928;Yale Univ. Press, New Haven. pp. 314-331.
4. Pellicer J., Manzanares J.A., Mafe S. Am. J. Phys. 63:1995;542.
5. McNutt J.E., Andes G.M. J. Chem. Phys. 30:1959;1300.
6. Blokhuis E.M., Shilkrot Y., Widom B. Mol. Phys. 86:1995;891.
7. Collins R.E., Cooke C.E. Jr. Trans. Faraday Soc. 55:1959;1602.
8. Fuji H., Nakae H. Philos. Mag. A. 72:1995;1505.
9. At this point it should be emphasized that a much more recent nonlocal derivation due to Boruvka et al. [35] (see also the main text) generalizes Gibb's results to include additional energy terms.
10. Poynting J.H., Thomson J.J. A Textbook of Physics. Properties of Matter. eighth ed. 1902;Griffin, London. pp. 139-140.
11. Adamson A.W. Physical Chemistry of Surfaces. sixth ed. 1997;Wiley. p. 353.
12. Sommerfield A. Mechanics of Deformable Bodies. Lectures on Theoretical Physics. vol. 2:1964;Academic Press, New York. p. 127.
13. De Gennes. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57:1985;827.
14. Sumner C.G. Symposium on Detergency. 1937;15-17 Chemical Pub. Co. New York.
15. Shuttleforth R., Bailey G.L.J. Dis. Faraday Soc. 3:1948;16.
16. Bico J., Marzolin C., Quéré D. Europhys. Lett. 47:1999;220.
17. Pethica B.A., Pethica T.J. Second International Congress on Surface Activity, vol. III, Electrical Phenomena, Solid-Liquid Interface. 1957;131-135 Butterworth, London.
18. Johnson R.E. Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 63:1959;1655.
19. Michaelis A.S., Dean S.W. J. Phys. Chem. 66:1962;1790.
20. Adamson A.W., Ling I. Adv. Chem. Ser. 43:1964;57-73.
21. Zisman W.A. Adv. Chem. Ser. 43:1964;1-51.
22. This point of view is also shared by W.A. Zisman: see his comments at the end of the paper in Ref. [15].
23. Jameson G.J., del Cerro M.C.G. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I. 72:1976;883.
24. Miller C.A., Ruckenstein E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 48:1974;368.
25. In addition, it is significant that these authors do not try to invalidate Gibbs' derivation.
26. Shimizu S., Kusunase T., Kimura H., Ooyama M., Imura M., Ishikura S., Sahira K., Kitamura H., Shiraishi H., Nakada Y., Wada M., Suzuki M., Narite T. NASDA-JSUP. 1:1991;49.
27. Nijmeijer M.J.P., Bruin C., Bakker A.F., van Leeuwen J.M.J. Phys. Rev. A. 42:1990;6052.
28. A microscopic derivation based on statistical mechanics does exist De Coninck J., et al. Phys. Rev. E. 65:2002;036139. Of course, any microscopic approach relies on several particular assumptions, e.g., concerning the molecular interactions. Thus, any microscopic approach necessarily has a lesser degree of generality compared to a thermodynamical derivation.
29. Israelachvili J.N. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 16:1982;31.
30. Michaels A., Dean S.W. J. Phys. Chem. 66:1962;1790.
31. Although implicitly, this assumption is also made in Ref. [11].
32. Wada T., Fukumoto T. J. Jpn. Inst. Welding. 37:1968;845.
33. Herzberg W.J., Marian J.E. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 33:1970;161.
34. ij are presented.
35. Barrat J.L., Bocquet L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82:1999;4671.
36. Although in our derivation the energy balance is written in terms of the Gibbs free energy, the results are exactly the same if the Hemoltz free energy is used instead. It should be remarked here that the process is not carried out at constant pressure nor at constant volume (both δV and δP are, in general, different from zero in Eq. (6)).
37. Pompe T., Herminghaus S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85:2000;1930.
38. Boruvka L., Neumann A.W. J. Chem. Phys. 66:1977;5464.
39. Marmur A., Krasovitski B. Langmuir. 18:2002;8919.
40. Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. Statistical Physics, Part 1. 1980;Pergamon, Oxford. p. 532.
41. Fowkes F.M. J. Phys. Chem. 67:1963;2538.
42. Owens D.K., Wendt R.C. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 13:1969;1741.