Nasal dyspnea: The place of rhinomanometry in its objective assessment

American Journal of Rhinology

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 41-46

  Schumacher, Michael J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NOSE AIRFLOW; NOSE OBSTRUCTION; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RHINITIS; RHINOMANOMETRY; SCORING SYSTEM; STANDARDIZATION; SYMPTOMATOLOGY;

EID: 1542581527     PISSN: 10506586     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/194589240401800109     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Viner AS, and Jackman N. Retrospective survey of 1271 patients diagnosed as perennial rhinitis. Clin Allergy 6:251-259, 1976.
2. Naito K, Cole P, Chaban R, and Oprysk D. Nasal resistance, sensation of obstruction and rhinoscopic findings compared. Am J Rhinol 2:65-69, 1988.
3. Sipila J, Suonpaa J, and Laippala P. Sensation of nasal obstruction compared to rhinomanometric results in patients referred for septoplasty. Rhinology 32:141-144, 1994.
4. Constantinides MS, Adamson PA, and Cole P. The long-term effects of open cosmetic septorhinoplasty on nasal air flow. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:41-45, 1996.
5. Naito K, Cole P, and Humphrey D. Comparison of subjective and objective nasal patency before and after decongestion of the nasal mucosa. Am J Rhinol 5:113-115, 1991.
6. D'Souza MF, Emanuel MB, Gregg J, et al. A method for evaluating therapy for hay fever. A comparison of four treatments. Clin Allergy 13:329-35, 1983.
7. Linder A. Symptom scores as measures of the severity of rhinitis. Clin Allergy 18:29-37, 1988.
8. Annesi-Maesano I, Didier A, Klossek M et al. The score for allergic rhinitis (SFAR): A simple and valid assessment method for population studies. Allergy 57:107-114, 2002.
9. Juniper EF, Thompson AK, Ferrie PJ, et al. Validation of the standardized version of the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire. J Allergy Clin Immunol 104:364-369, 1999.
10. Juniper EF, Thompson AK, Ferrie PJ, et al. Development and validation of the mini rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire. Clin Exp Allergy 30:132-140, 2000.
11. Juniper EF, Thompson AK, and Roberts JN. Can the standard gamble and rating scale be used to measure the quality of life in rhinoconjunctivitis? Comparison with the RQLQ and SF-36. Allergy 57:201-206, 2002.
12. Sipila J, and Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 254:387-390, 1997.
13. Ricci E, Palonta F, Preti G, et al. Role of nasal valve in the surgically corrected nasal respiratory obstruction: Evaluation through rhinomanometry. Am J Rhinol 15:307-310, 2001.
14. Vogt K, Hasse W, Jalowayski AA, et al. The clinical impact of high resolution rhinomanometry. In Abstract, 17th World Congress Int Fed Oto-Rhino-Laryngol Soc, Cairo, Egypt, 2002.
15. Clarke RW, and Jones AS. The limitations of peak nasal flow measurement. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 19:502-504, 1994.
16. Schumacher MJ, and Pain MCF. Nasal challenge testing in grass pollen hay fever. J Allergy Clin Immunol 64:202-208, 1979.
17. Cole P. Acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinol Suppl 16:29-34, 2000.
18. Schumacher MJ. Rhinomanometry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 83: 711-718, 1989.
19. Schumacher MJ, and Gaines JA. Mathematical modeling of pressure flow curves from posterior rhinomanometry. J Allergy Clin Immunol 77:241, 1986.
20. Clement PAR. Committee report on standardization of rhinomanometry. Rhinology 22:151-155, 1984.
21. Broms P, Jonson B, and Lamm CJ. A universal way to evaluate the curve in rhinomanometry. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 360:22-23, 1979.
22. Lund VJ. Objective assessment of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 22:279-90, 1989.
23. Naito K, and Iwata S. Current advances in rhinomanometry. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 254:309-312, 1997.
24. Cole P. Nasal patency and its assessment. Am J Rhinol 1:135-139, 1987.
25. Schumacher MJ. Nasal congestion and airway obstruction: The validity of available objective and subjective measures. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2:245-251, 2002.
26. Cole P. Nasal airflow resistance: A survey of 2500 assessments. Am J Rhinol 11:415-420, 1997.
27. Szucs E, Kaufman L, and Clement PA: Nasal resistance - a reliable assessment of nasal patency? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 20:390-395, 1995.
28. Shelton DM, and Eiser NM. Evaluation of active anterior and posterior rhinomanometry in normal subjects. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 17:178-182, 1992.
29. Canbay EI, and Bhatia SN. A comparison of nasal resistance in white caucasians and blacks. Am J Rhinol 11:73-75, 1997.
30. Cole P, Haight JSJ, Love L, et al. Dynamic components of nasal resistance. Am Rev Resp Dis 132:1229-1232, 1985.
31. Stoksted P. Rhinometric measurements for the determination of the nasal cycle. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 109:159, 1953.
32. Rundcrantz H. Postural variations and nasal patency. Acta Otolaryngol 68:435-443, 1969.
33. Pirilä T. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal secretion in the clinical monitoring of the nasal provocation test. Clin Exp Allergy 28:468-477, 1998.
34. Eccles R, Jawad MS, and Morris S. The effects of oral administration of (-)-menthol on nasal resistance to airflow and sensation of airflow in subjects suffering from nasal congestion associated with the common cold. J Pharmacy Pharmacol 42:652-654, 1990.
35. Orgel HA, Meltzer EO, Kemp JP, et al. Clinical, rhinomanometric, and cytologic evaluation of seasonal allergic rhinitis treated with beclomethasone dipropionate as aqueous nasal spray or pressurized aerosol. J Allergy Clin Immunol 77:858-864, 1986.
36. Kohan D, Jacobs JB, Nass RL, et al. Rhinomanometric evaluation of two nasal steroid sprays in rhinitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 101:429-433, 1989.
37. Malm L, Gerth van Wijk R, and Bachert C. Guidelines for nasal provocations with aspects on nasal patency, airflow, and airflow resistance. International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways, International Rhinologic Society. Rhinology 38:1-6, 2000.