|
Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 259-280
|
Whose life is it anyway?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
CONJOINED TWINS;
DEATH;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
PARENT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
SURGERY;
UNITED KINGDOM;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
DEATH;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PARENTS;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE;
TWINS, CONJOINED;
VALUE OF LIFE;
|
EID: 1542574392
PISSN: 09670742
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/9.3.259 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (26)
|
References (0)
|