Evaluating Teachers' Relationships with Families: A Case Study of One District

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 1996, Pages

  Chrispeels, Janet H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542572626     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/461861     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ames, C., de Stefano, L., Watkins, T., & Sheldon, S. (1995). Teachers' school-to-home communications and parent involvement: The role of parent perceptions and beliefs (Report No. 28). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Families, Communities, Schools, and Children's Learning.
2. Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. (1986). A world of difference: A prejudice reduction program of the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. New York: Anti-Defamation League.
3. Archer, A., & Gleason, M. (1990). Skills for school success. Bilerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
4. Assembly Bill 322, Education Parental Involvement, Chapter 1400 (1990).
5. Assembly Bill 1264, Teacher Credentialing: Standards for Preparation of Educators to Work with Families. Chapter 767 (1993).
6. Baker, E. L. (1994). Researchers and assessment policy development: A cautionary tale. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 450-477.
7. California Department of Education. (1987). Caught in the middle: Educational reform for young adolescents in California public schools. Sacramento, CA: Author.
8. California Department of Education. (1989). California State Board of Education policy on parent involvement. Sacramento, CA: Author.
9. California Department of Education. (1992a). It's elementary: Elementary grades task force report. Sacramento, CA: Author.
10. California Department of Education. (1992b). Second to none: A vision of the new California high school. Sacramento, CA: Author.
11. California Parent Teacher Association. (1993, May 7). Credential requirement: Parent/family involvement component. Resolution adopted by convention delegates, Los Angeles.
12. Chavkin, N., & Williams, D. (1988). Critical issues for teacher training for parent involvement. Educational Horizons, 66(2), 87-89.
13. Chrispeels, J. H. (1988). The family as an educational resource. Community Education Journal, 14(3), 10-17.
14. Chrispeels, J. H. (1991). District leadership in parent involvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(5), 367-371.
15. Chrispeels, J. H. (1992). Using an effective schools framework to build home-school partnerships for student success (Occasional paper). Madison: University of Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
16. Chrispeels, J. H. (1995, April). CLAS: Down but not out: Continued learning assessment activities in California result from earlier co-construction of reform policies between state and local levels. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
17. Chrispeels, J., Fernandez, B., & Preston, J. (1990). Home and school: Partners for student success. San Diego: San Diego City Schools.
18. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994). National standards and assessments: Will they improve education? American Journal of Education, 102(4), 478-510.
19. Elmore, R. F. (1983). Forward and backward mapping: Reversible logic in the analysis of public policy. Seattle: University of Seattle, Institute for Public Policy and Management.
20. Epstein, J. L. (1987). Parent involvement: What research says to administrators. Education and Urban Society, 19(2), 119-136.
21. Epstein, J. L., & Becker, H. J. (1982). Teachers' reported practices of parent involvement: Problems and possibilities. Elementary School Journal, 83, 103-113.
22. Epstein, J. L., & Dauber, S. (1991). School programs and teacher practices of parent involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. Elementary School Journal, 91, 289-303.
23. Evaluation and Assessment Guidelines, Chapter 3, Article II, Section 44662, California Education Code (Revised 1995).
24. Fuhrman, S. D. (1993). Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Fuhrman, S. D., & Elmore, R. (1990). Understanding local control in the wake of state education reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 124, 82-96.
26. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. London: Falmer.
27. Fullan, M., & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 744-752.
28. Gordon, I. J., & Breivogel, W. F. (Eds.). (1976). Building effective home-school relationships. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Harris, L., Kagay, M., & Ross, J. (1987). The Metropolitan Life survey of the American teacher: Strengthening links between home and school. New York: Louis Harris.
30. Henderson, A. T. (Ed.). (1981). The evidence grows: Parent involvement and student achievement. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
31. Henderson, A. T. (Ed.). (1987). The evidence continues to grow: Parent involvement improves student achievement. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
32. Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (Eds.). (1994). A new generation of evidence: The family is critical to student achievement. Columbia, MD: National Committee for Citizens in Education.
33. Houston, W. R., & Williamson, J. L. (1990). Perceptions of their preparation by 42 Texas elementary school teachers compared with their responses as student teachers. Houston: Texas Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
34. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium. (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensing and development: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
35. Lyons, P., Robbing A., & Smith, A. (1982). Involving parents: A handbook for participation in schools. Santa Monica, CA: System Development Corporation.
36. McDonnell, L. M. (1994). Assessment policy as persuasion and regulation. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 394-420.
37. McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Alternative policy instruments (Report prepared for the Center for Policy Research in Education). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
38. McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1991). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. In A. R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 157-184). Albany: State University of New York Press.
39. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171-178.
40. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1994). What teachers should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: Author.
41. Porter, A. C. (1994). National standards and school improvement in the 1990s: Issues and promise. American Journal of Education, 102(4), 421-449.
42. Santa Cruz New Teacher Project/BTSA. (1995a). Beginning teacher support and assessment framework. Santa Cruz, CA: Santa Cruz County Office of Education.
43. Santa Cruz New Teacher Project/BTSA. (1995b). A developmental continuum of teacher abilities. Santa Cruz, CA: Santa Cruz County Office of Education.
44. Scriven, M. (1995, April). Fundamental problems in evaluating personnel in the professions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
45. Senate Bill 1448, Charter Schools Act of 1992, Chapter 781 (1992).
46. Shartrand, A., Kreider, H., & Erickson-Warfield, M. (1994). Preparing teachers to involve parents: A national survey of teacher education programs. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
47. Shoop, R. J., & Dunklee, D. R. (1992). School law for the principal: A handbook for practitioners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
48. South Bay Union School District. (1991, November 5). Classified job description, I/36. Imperial Beach, CA: Author.
49. South Bay Union School District. (1995a). A compilation of successful, innovative parent involvement programs that you can implement. Imperial Beach, CA: Author.
50. South Bay Union School District. (1995b). Teacher developmental report/performance standards. Imperial Beach, CA: Author.
51. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
52. Swap, S. M. (1993). Developing home-school partnerships: From concepts to practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
53. U.S. Department of Education. (1994). Goals 2000: National education goals. Washington, DC: Author.
54. Van Maanen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55. Wheeler v. Yuma School District, 156 Ariz. 100 (1986), 750 P.2d 857.