Analysis of the deformation of the useful visual field: A comment on Rantanen (2003)

Perceptual and Motor Skills

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 635-638

  Rogé, Joceline ^a,b   Muzet, Alain ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UPS 858   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NOTE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SLEEP DEPRIVATION; SLEEP STAGE; VISUAL FIELD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANISOTROPY; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SLEEP DEPRIVATION; SLEEP STAGES; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 1542572297     PISSN: 00315125     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/pms.2003.97.2.635     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CHAN, H. S., & COURTNEY, A. T. (1993) Effects of cognitive foveal load on a peripheral single-target detection task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 515-533.
2. EDWARDS, D. C., & GOOLKASIAN, P. A. (1974) Peripheral vision location and kinds of complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 244-249.
3. HOCKEY, G. R. J. (1970) Changes in attention allocation in a multicomponent task under loss of sleep. British Journal of Psychology, 61, 473-480.
4. IKEDA, M., & TAKEUCHI, T. (1975) Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
5. JOHNSON, C. A., KELTNER, J. L., & BALESTRERY, F. (1978) Effects of target size and eccentricity on visual detection and resolution. Vision Research, 18, 1217-1222.
6. MACKWORTH, N. H. (1965) Visual noise causes vision tunnel. Psychonomic Science, 3, 67-68.
7. MACKWORTH, N. H. (1976) Stimulus density limits the useful field of view. In R. A. Monty & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Pp. 307-321.
8. NOBLE, M., & SANDERS, A. F. (1980) Searching for traffic signals while engaged in compensatory tracking. Human factors, 22, 89-102.
9. RANTANEN, E. M. (2003) Measurement of the visual field. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 92-94.
10. RANTANEN, E. M., & GOLDBERG, J. H. (1999) The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics, 42, 816-834.
11. ROGÉ, J., KIELBASA, L., & MUZET, A. (2002) Deformation of the useful visual field with state of vigilance, task priority, and central task complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 118-130.
12. ROGE, T., PÉBAYLE, T., HANNACHI, S. E., & MUZET, A. (2003) Effect of sleep deprivation and driving duration on the useful visual field in younger and older subjects during simulator driving. Vision Research, 43, 1465-1472.
13. ROGE, .J., PÉBAYLE, T., KIEHN, L., & MUZET, A. (2002) Alteration of the useful visual field as a function of state of vigilance in simulated car driving. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 189-200.
14. SCIALPA, C., KLINE, D., & LYMAN, B. (1987) Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14-19.
15. WARD, N. J., PAKES, A., & CRONE, P. R. (1995) Effects of background scene complexity and field dependence on the legibility of head-up displays for automotive applications. Human Factors, 37, 735-745.
16. WILLIAMS, L. J. (1982) Cognitive load and the functional field of view. The Human factors Society, 12, 684-692.
17. WILLIAMS, L. J. (1988) Tunnel vision or general interference? Cognitive load and attentional bias are both important. American Journal of Psychology, 101, 171-191.