A comparison of receiver technologies in borehole MMR and EM surveys

Geophysical Prospecting

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 85-96

  Elders, J A ^a   Asten, M W ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NOISE; ACOUSTIC RECEIVERS; BOREHOLES; ELECTROMAGNETIC PROSPECTING; MAGNETOELECTRIC EFFECTS; TRANSIENTS; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

MAGNETOMETRIC RESISTIVITY;

MAGNETIC PROSPECTING;

BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY; MAGNETIC METHOD; MASSIVE SULFIDE; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; BROKEN HILL; EURASIA; EUROPE; NEW SOUTH WALES; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 1542539222     PISSN: 00168025     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2003.00406.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Asten M.W. 1988. The downhole magnetometric resistivity (DHMMR) method. Exploration Geophysics 19, 12-16.
2. Asten M.W. 1991. Field examples of the downhole MMR method and comparison with the TEM method. Appendix to 'The magnetometric resistivity method', by R.N. Edwards and M.N. Nabighian. In: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 2 (ed. M.N. Nabighian, pp. 99-104. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
3. Asten M.W. 1992. Interpretation of ground TEM data from conductive terranes. Exploration Geophysics 23, 9-16.
4. Asten M.W. 1996. Drill-hole EM - a strictly scientific hokey-pokey. Exploration Geophysics 27, 41-50.
5. Asten M.W. 2000. Magnetometric and inductive modelling in 3D using tubes of electric current. 70th SEG meeting, Calgary, Canada, Expanded Abstracts, Paper EM3.8.
6. Bishop J., Carroll N., Asten M., Hatch M. and MacInnes S. 1997. Finding sphalerite at Broken Hill with drillhole magnetometric resistivity. Exploration Geophysics 28, 6-10.
7. Bishop J. and Lewis R. 1996. Introduction to the 1996 Special Volume on DHEM. Exploration Geophysics 27, 37-39.
8. Bishop J., Lewis R. and Stolz N. 2000. Horses for (conductive) courses. DHEM and DHMMR. Exploration Geophysics 31, 192-199.
9. Cull J.C. 1996. Rotation and resolution of three-component DHEM data. Exploration Geophysics 27, 155-160.
10. Duncan A., Williams P., Turner G., Amann B., Tully T., O'Keeffe K. and Wellington A. 1998. Examples from a new EM and electrical methods receiver system. Exploration Geophysics 29, 347-354.
11. Edwards R.N. 1974. The magnetometric resistivity method and its application to the mapping of a fault. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 11, 1136-1156.
12. Griffiths D., Stirling W.D. and Weldon K.L. 1998. Understanding Data: Principles and Practice of Statistics, pp. 58-64. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13. McCracken K.G., Oristaglio M.L. and Hohmann G.W. 1986. The minimization of noise in electromagnetic exploration systems. Geophysics 51, 819-832.
14. Purss M.B.J., Asten M.W. and Cull J.P. 2001. Modelling the magnetic induced polarisation (MIP) response from the downhole magnetometric resistivity (DHMMR) method. 15th ASEG Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts.
15. Richards D.J. 1987. CRAE's approach to downhole TEM at Broken Hill. Exploration Geophysics 18, 279-284.
16. Sheard N., Ritchie T., Kingman J. and Rowston P. 1998. MIMDAS - a new direction in geophysics. Preview 76, 104.
17. Sheriff R.E. 1984. Encyclopedic Dictionary of Exploration Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
18. Veitch D., Asten M.W. and van Leeuwen E.H. 1990. Electrical and magnetometric fields in a layered earth containing buried electrodes. Geophysics 55, 1605-1612.