Using dependency diagrams in dynamic modelling of object-oriented systems

Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications

Volumn 7, Issue , 2003, Pages 277-283

  Vasilache, Simona ^a   Tanaka, Jiro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamic modelling; Object oriented analysis and design; Scenarios; State machines

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINES; COMPUTER SCIENCE; LIFE CYCLE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

DYNAMIC MODELLING; OBJECT-ORIENTED ANALYSIS AND DESIGN; STATE MACHINES;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 1542538514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. P. Hsia, J. Samuel, J. Gao, D. Kung, Y. Toyoshima, C. Chen, Formal approach to scenario analysis, IEEE Software 11(2), 1994, 33-41.
2. J. Rumbaugh, M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, W. Lorensen. Object-oriented modeling and design (Prentice Hall, 1991).
3. Rational Software Corporation. Unified Modeling Language (UML), http://www.rational.com.
4. D. Harel, Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8(3), 1987, 231-274.
5. J. Ali and J. Tanaka, Constructing statecharts from event trace diagrams, Technical report of IEICE, KBSE98-33, 1998, 41-47.
6. J. Ali and J. Tanaka, An object-oriented approach to generate executable code from the OMT-based dynamic model, Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 2(4), 1998, 65-77.
7. J. Ali and J. Tanaka, Implementing the dynamic behaviour represented as multiple state diagrams and activity diagrams, Journal of Computer Science and Information Management (JCSIM) 2 (1), 2001, 22-34.
8. J. Ryser, and M. Glinz, Using dependency charts to improve scenario-based testing. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Testing Computer Software (TCS2000), Washington D.C., 2000.
9. J. C. S. P. Leite, G. D. S. Hadad, J. H. Doom, G. N. Kaplan, A scenario construction process, Requirements Engineering 5, 2000, 38-61.
10. S. Vasilache and J. Tanaka, Synthesizing statecharts from multiple interrelated scenarios, ISFST2001, ZhengZhou, China, 2001, 158-163.
11. S. Vasilache and J. Tanaka, Translating OMT state diagrams with concurrency into SDL diagrams, Proceedings of the International Symposium for Future Software Technology (ISFST2000), Guiyang, China, 2000, 21-26.
12. L. Helouet et C. Jard, La manipulation formelle de scenarios, Modelisation des systemes reactifs, Vol. 0, 2001.
13. J. Whittle and J. Schumann, Generating statechart designs from scenarios. Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE2000), Limerick, Ireland, 2000, 314-323.
14. Object Management Group, Object Constraint Language Specification, http://www.omg.org.
15. H. Muccini, An approach for detecting implied scenarios, Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools, ICSE2002 Workshop, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2002.
16. K. Koskimies, T. Mannisto, T. Systa, J. Tuomi, Automatic support for dynamic modeling of object-oriented software. IEEE Software 15(1), 1998, 87-94.
17. S. Schonberger, R. K. Keller, I. Khriss, Algorithmic support for model transformation in object-oriented software development, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 13(5), 2001, 351-383.
18. J. Whittle and J. Schumann, Generating statechart designs from scenarios. Scenario-based round-trip engineering, OOPSLA2000 Workshop, Tampere University of Technology, 2000.
19. I. Jacobson, Object-oriented software engineering: A use case driven approach, (Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992).
20. R. J. A. Buhr, R. S. Casselman. Use case maps for object-oriented systems (Prentice Hall, 1996).
21. F. Bordeleau, J. P. Corriveau, On the need for "state machine implementation" design patterns. Scenarios and state machines: models, algorithms, and tools, ICSE2002 Workshop, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2002.