On an inconsistency in the derivation of the equations of elastohydrodynamic lubrication

Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Volumn 459, Issue 2039, 2003, Pages 2771-2786

  Rajagopal, K R ^a   Szeri, A Z ^b  

^a Texas AandM University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Elastohydrodynamic lubrication; Lubrication approximation; Piezoviscous fluid; Reynolds equation

Indexed keywords

LUBRICATING AGENT;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; DERIVATIZATION; ELASTICITY; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYPOBARISM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIQUID; LUBRICATION; MECHANICS; MOTION; PRESSURE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 1542512434     PISSN: 13645021     EISSN: 14712946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2003.1145     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Almqvist, T. & Larsson, R. 2002 The Navier-Stokes approach for thermal EHL line contact solution. Tribol. Int. 35, 163-170.
2. Antman, S. S. & Marlow, R. S. 1991 Material constraints, Lagrange multipliers, and compatibility: application to rod and shell theories. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 116, 257-299.
3. Bair, S., Khonsari, M. & Winer, W. O. 1998 High-pressure rheology of lubricants and limitations of the Reynolds equation. Tribol. Int. 10, 573-586.
4. Bendler, J. T., Fontanella, J. J. & Schlesinger, M. F. 2001 A new Vogel-like law: ionic conductivity, dielectric relaxation and viscosity near the glass transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 195503.
5. Bissett, E. J. & Glander, D. W. 1988 A highly accurate approach that resolves the pressure spike of elastohydrodynamic lubrication. J. Tribol. 110, 241-246.
6. Bridgman, P. W. 1931 The physics of high pressure. New York: MacMillan.
7. Cutler, W. G., McMickles, R. J., Webb, W. & Schiessler, R. W. 1958 Study of the compressions of several high molecular weight hydrocarbons. J. Chem. Phys. 29, 727-740.
8. Dowson, D. & Higginson, G. R. 1966 Elastohydrodynamic lubrication. The fundamentals of roller and gear lubrication. Oxford: Pergamon.
9. Gauss, C. F. 1829 Über ein neues allgemeines Grundgesetz der Mechanik. J. Reine Angew. Math. 4, 232-235.
10. Gazzola, F. 1997 A note on the solution of Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure dependent viscosity. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 48, 760-773.
11. Gazzola, F. & Secchi, P. 1998 Some results about stationary Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure-dependent viscosity. In Navier-Stokes equations: theory and numerical methods (ed. R. Salvi), pp. 31-37. New York: Longman.
12. Greenwood, J. A. 2000 In Thinning Films and Tribological Interfaces. Proc 26th Leeds-Lyon Symp. (ed. D. Dowson), Tribology series, vol. 28, pp. 793-794. Elsevier.
13. Griest, E. M., Webb, W. & Schiessler, R. W. 1958 Effect of pressure on viscosity of higher hydrocarbons and their mixtures. J. Chem. Phys. 29, 711-720.
14. Houpert, L. G. & Hamrock, B. J. 1986 Fast approach for calculating film thicknesses and pressures in elastohydrodynamically lubricated contacts at high loads. J. Tribol. 108, 411-420.
15. Hron, J., Malek, J. & Rajagopal, K. R. 2001 Simple flows of fluids with pressure-dependent viscosities. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 457, 1603-1622.
16. Irving, J. B. & Barlow, A. J. 1971 An automatic high pressure viscometer. J. Phys. E 4, 232-236.
17. Johnson, K. L. & Cameron, R. 1967 Shear behaviour of elastohydrodynamic oil films at high rolling contact pressures. Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs 182, 307-319.
18. Johnson, K. L. & Greenwood, J. A. 1980 Thermal analysis of an Eyring fluid in elastrohydrodynamic traction. Wear 61, 355-374.
19. Johnson, K. L. & Tevaarwerk, J. L. 1977 Shear behaviour of elastohydrodynamic oil films. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 356, 215-236.
20. Liu, I. S. 1972 Method of Lagrange multipliers for exploitation of the entropy principle. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 46, 131-148.
21. Malek, J., Necas, J. & Rajagopal, K. R. 2002a Global analysis of the flow of fluids with pressure-dependent viscosities. Arch. Ration. Mech. Analysis 165, 243-269.
22. Malek, J., Necas, J. & Rajagopal, K. R. 2002b Global existence of solutions for flows of fluids with pressure-and shear-dependent viscosities. Appl. Math. Lett. 15, 961-967.
23. Navier, C. L. 1823 Mémoire sur les lois du mouvement des fluides. Mem. Acad. R. Sci. Paris 6, 389-440.
24. Paluch, M., Dendzik, Z. & Rzoska, S. J. 1999 Scaling of high-pressure viscosity data in low-molecular-weight glass-forming liquids. Phys. Rev. B 60, 2979-2982.
25. Renardy, M. 1986 Some remarks on the Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure-dependent viscosity. Commun. PDEs 11, 779-793.
26. Reynolds, O. 1886 On the theory of lubrication and its application to Mr Tower's experiments. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 177, 159-209.
27. Roelands, C. J. A. 1966 Correlation aspects of the viscosity-temperature- pressure relationship of lubricating oils. PhD dissertation, Technische Hogeschool Delft, The Netherlands.
28. Schafer, C. T., Giese, P., Rowe, W. B. & Woolley, N. H. 2000 Elastohydrodynamically lubricated line contact based on the Navier-Stokes equations. In Thinning Films and Tribological Interfaces. Proc 26th Leeds-Lyon Symp. (ed. D. Dowson), Tribology series, vol. 28, pp. 57-68. Elsevier.
29. Stokes, G. G. 1845 On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion, and of the equilibrium and motion of elastic solids. Trans. Camb. Phil. Soc. 8, 287-305.
30. Szeri, A. Z. 1998 Fluid film lubrication: theory and design. Cambridge University Press.
31. Venner, C. H. & Lubrecht, A. A. 1994 Transient analysis of surface features in an EHL line contact in the case of sliding. J. Tribol. 116, 186-193.