Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience

Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 107-120

  Huff, C Ronald ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542498461     PISSN: 17077753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3138/cjccj.46.2.107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bloom, Robert M. 2003 Jailhouse informants. Criminal Justice 18(1): 20-26.
2. Borchard, Edwin M. 1932 Convicting the Innocent: Sixty-Five Actual Errors of Criminal Justice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
3. Denov, Myriam and Kathryn Campbell 2003 Criminal injustice: Understanding the causes, effects, and responses to wrongful conviction in Canada. Unpublished manuscript, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON.
4. Forst, Brian 2003 Errors of Justice: Nature, Sources and Remedies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Griffin, Lisa 2001 The correction of wrongful convictions: A comparative perspective. American University International Law Review 16: 1241-1308.
6. Gross, Samuel R. 1998 Update: American public opinion on the death penalty - it's getting personal. Cornell Law Review 83: 1448-1475.
7. Huff, C. Ronald 2003 Wrongful conviction and public policy: The American Society of Criminology 2001 Presidential Address. Criminology 40: 1-18.
8. Huff, C. Ronald, Arye Rattner, and Edward Sagarin 1996 Convicted but Innocent: Wrongful Conviction and Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Leahy, Patrick 2002 September 24 Comments at press conference, Washington, DC.
10. Liebman, James S. 2002 Rates of reversible error and the risk of wrongful execution. Judicature 86(2): 78-82.
11. Liebman, James S., Jeffrey Pagan, Valerie West, and Jonathan Lloyd 2000 Capital attrition: Error rates in capital cases, 1973-1995. Texas Law Review 78: 1839-1865.
12. Loftus, Elizabeth F. 1979 Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. McDermott, Terry 2000 Perez's bitter saga of lies, regrets, and harm. Los Angeles Times, December 31: A1, A22-A24.
14. Penrod, Stephen 2003 Eyewitness identification evidence: How well are witnesses and police performing? Criminal Justice 18(1): 36-47.
15. Plato, trans. Robin Waterfield 360 BC/1998 The Republic. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Radelet, Michael L., Hugo Adam Bedau, and Constance Putnam 1992 In Spite of Innocence. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
17. Scheck, Barry C. and Peter J. Neufeld 2002 Toward the formation of "innocence commissions" in America. Judicature 86(2): 98-105.
18. Scheck, Barry, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer 2000 Actual Innocence. New York: Doubleday.
19. U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation 2001 Crime in the United States: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
20. Weinberg, Steve 2003 Breaking the rules: Who suffers when a prosecutor is cited for misconduct? Center for Public Integrity, Washington, DC, June 23. http://www.publicintegrity.org/pm/default.aspx?sid=main
21. Wells, Gary L., Mark Small, Steven Penrod, Roy S. Malpass, Solomon Fulero, and C. Elizabeth Brimacombe 1998 Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior 22: 603-647.
22. Whitman, James Q. 2003 Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Zimring, Franklin E. 2003 The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.