Manifestations of R-parity violation in ultrahigh-energy neutrino interactions

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 58, Issue 9, 1998, Pages

  Carena, Marcela ^a   Choudhury, Debajyoti ^b   Lola, Smaragda ^c   Quigg, Chris ^a  

^a FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b HARISH CHANDRA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^c CERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542469700     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.095003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. a recent survey, see the Proceedings of the Workshop High Energy Cosmic Neutrinos: Origin, Production, and Detection, Marseille, France, 1997 (CPPM, Marseille, 1997).
2. R. Gandhi, C. Quigg, M. H. Reno, and I. Sarcevic, Astropart. Phys. 5, 81 (1996).
3. an update based on the CTEQ4 parton distributions, see R. Gandhi, C. Quigg, M. H. Reno, and I. Sarcevic, Phys. Rev. D (to be published), Report No. FERMILAB-PUB-98/087-T, hep-ph/9807264.A preliminary account appears in C. Quigg, “Neutrino Interaction Cross Sections,” Report No. FERMILAB-CONF-97/158-T, in Ref. 1.
4. George M. Frichter, Douglas W. McKay, and John P. Ralston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1508 (1995); G. Parente and E. Zas, contribution No. EPS 0127; Proceedings of the International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics (HEP 95), Brussels, edited by J. Lemonne et al. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996);A. V. Butkevich et al., contribution No. EPS 0523;
5. G. Hill, Astropart. Phys. 6, 215 (1997).
6. a survey of detectors for neutrino astronomy, see J. G. Learned, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A346, 99 (1994).
7. P. Fayet, Phys. Lett. 69B, 489 (1977);
8. Phys. Lett.G. Farrar and P. Fayet, 76B, 575 (1978).
9. D. Choudhury and S. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Lett. B 401, 54 (1997);
10. G. Altarelli, Nucl. Phys. B506, 3 (1997);
11. Nucl. Phys.H. Dreiner and P. Morawitz, B503, 55 (1997);
12. J. Kalinowski, Z. Phys. C 74, 595 (1997);
13. T. Kon and T. Kobayashi, Phys. Lett. B 409, 265 (1997);
14. G. Altarelli, G. F. Giudice, and M. L. Mangano, Nucl. Phys. B506, 29 (1997);
15. J. Ellis, S. Lola, and K. Sridhar, Phys. Lett. B 408, 252 (1997);
16. Phys. Lett. BM. Carena, D. Choudhury, S. Raychaudhuri, and C. E. M. Wagner, 414, 92 (1997).
17. H1 Collaboration, C. Adloff, Z. Phys. C 74, 191 (1997).
18. ZEUS Collaboration, J. Breitweg, Z. Phys. C 74, 207 (1997).
19. See, e.g., L. J. Hall and M. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. B231, 419 (1984).
20. M. A. Diaz, “R-parity Breaking in Minimal Supergravity,” Report No. IFIC-97-93, hep-ph/9712213;
21. M. A. Diaz“The Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with a Bilinear R-parity Violating Term,” Report No. IFIC-97-87, hep-ph/9711435, and references therein;
22. H. P. Nilles and N. Polonsky, Nucl. Phys. B484, 33 (1997);
23. Nucl. Phys.R. Hempling, B478, 3 (1996);
24. M. Carena, S. Pokorski, and C. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B 430, 281 (1998).
25. L. Ibañez and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 260, 291 (1991);
26. L. IbañezG. G. RossNucl. Phys. B368, 3 (1992);
27. S. Lola and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 314, 336 (1993);
28. Phys. Lett. BP. Binétruy, E. Dudas, S. Lavignac, and C. A. Savoy, 422, 171 (1998);
29. J. Ellis, S. Lola, and G. G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B526, 115 (1998).
30. V. Barger, G. F. Giudice, and T. Han, Phys. Rev. D 40, 2987 (1989).
31. G. Bhattacharyya, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 52A, 83 (1997);
32. G. Bhattacharyya“A brief review of R-parity violating couplings,” Report No. IFUP-TH 43/97, hep-ph/9709395.
33. H. Dreiner, in Perspectives on Supersymmetry, edited by G. L. Kane (World Scientific, Singapore, in press), hep-ph/9707435, Vol. 2.
34. J. L. Goity and M. Sher, Phys. Lett. B 346, 69 (1995);
35. Phys. Lett. BJ. L. GoityM. Sher385, 500(E) (1996).
36. The first candidate (Formula presented) event has been presented recently by E787 Collaboration, S. Adler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2204 (1997). Based on the observation of one event, the 90% confidence level upper limit on the branching ratio is (Formula presented)
37. We use the fact that (Formula presented) to update the bound given by K. Agashe and M. Graesser, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4445 (1995).
38. a study of leptoquark production in ultrahigh-energy neutrino interactions, see M. A. Doncheski and R. W. Robinett, Phys. Rev. D 56, 7412 (1997). See also brief comments in Ref. 3.
39. F. Vissani and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Lett. B 380, 317 (1996);
40. Phys. Lett. BD. Choudhury and P. Roy, 378, 153 (1996).
41. The CDF bound of (Formula presented) for branching (Formula presented) weakens to (Formula presented) for branching (Formula presented) See H. S. Kambara, “Search for Leptoquarks at CDF,” Report No. FERMILAB-CONF-97/225-E, hep-ex/9706026.
42. The corresponding D∅ bounds are (Formula presented) or (Formula presented) for branching (Formula presented) or 1/2. See D∅ Collaboration, B. Abbott, “Search for Leptoquarks in D∅,” Report No. FERMILAB-CONF-97/224-E, hep-ex/9706027.
43. CTEQ Collaboration, H. Lai, Phys. Rev. D 51, 4763 (1995).
44. See Ref. 2 for a complete survey.
45. J. G. Learned and S. Pakvasa, Astropart. Phys. 3, 267 (1995).