IRA, standards, and educational reform

Reading Teacher

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 290-298

  Salinger, Terry ^a  

^a IRA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1542468344     PISSN: 00340561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cuban, L. (1990). Four stories about national goals for American education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 264-271.
2. Darling-Hammond, L. (1992). Standards of practice for learner-centered schools. New York: National Center for Restructuring Education, School, and Teaching.
3. Darling-Hammond, L. (1994, December). What do we know about learning and teaching, and how do we articulate it in relation to content? Paper presented at the meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Dallas, TX.
4. Edelsky. C. (1991). With literacy and justice for all. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
5. Elkind, D. (1994). Educational reform: Modern and post-modern. Holistic Education Review, 1(4), 5-12.
6. Elley, W.B. (1992). How in the world do students read? The Hague: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
7. Grossman, P.L., & Shulman, L.S. (1994). Knowing, believing, and teaching of English. In T. Shanahan (Ed.), Teachers thinking, teachers knowing (pp. 3-22). Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.
8. Harvard Graduate School of Education (1993). Standards and assessment: The push for new standards provokes hope and fear-and both are justified. The Harvard Education Letter, 9(5), 1-3, 5-6.
9. Lapoint, A.E., Askew, J.M., & Mead, N.A. (1992). Learning science. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10. Lapoint, A.E., Mead, M.A., & Askew, J.M. (1992). Learning mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11. Meier, D. (1995). How our schools could be. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 369-373.
12. Mitchell, P. (1994, December). Business perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Dallas, TX.
13. National Academy of Education. (1993). The trial state assessments: Prospects and realities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
14. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1984). A nation at risk: The full account. Washington, DC: Author.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum evaluation standards for school mathematics (1991): Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
16. Northeast Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands. (1994, October). Status report on voluntary national standards in education. Andover, MA: Author.
17. Perrone, V. (Ed.). (1991). Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Phillips, S.E. (1994). Opportunity for success. National Council on Measurement in Education Quarterly Newsletter, 3(1), 2.
19. Porter, A.C. (1993, Fall). Opportunity to learn. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
20. Porter, A.C. (1995). The uses and misuses of opportunity-to-learn standards. Educational Researcher, 24(1), 21-27.
21. Simmons, W., & Resnick, L. (1993). Assessment as the catalyst of school reform. Educational Leadership, 50(5).
22. Stiggins, R.J. (1992). High quality classroom assessment: What does it really mean? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(2), 35-39.
23. Stiggins, R.J. (1994). Student-centered classroom assessment. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.
24. Sykes, P., & Plastrik, G. (1993). Educational reform and standard setting. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25. Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 231-262.
26. Viadero, D. (1994, January 19). Standards in collision: What will happen when all those ambitious plans reach the classroom? Education Week, 25-27.
27. Wiggins, G. (1989). Teaching to the (authentic) test. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 41-47.