|
|
Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-12
|
|
Posthumous insemination and consent: the continuing, troubling case of Mr and Mrs Blood.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION;
CHILD;
CHILD WELFARE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
ETHICS;
FEMALE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 1990 (GREAT BRITAIN);
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
MARRIAGE;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
PATERNITY;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
PREGNANCY;
SPOUSE;
UNITED KINGDOM;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY ACT 1990 (GREAT BRITAIN);
LEGAL APPROACH;
CHILD;
CHILD WELFARE;
CIVIL RIGHTS;
FEMALE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
MALE;
MARITAL STATUS;
PATERNITY;
POSTHUMOUS CONCEPTION;
PREGNANCY;
SPOUSES;
|
|
EID: 1542427824
PISSN: 10287825
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1179/hrge.9.1.y669110n8304p411 Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
