Patient preferences for anaesthesia management during cataract surgery

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 88, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 333-335

  Friedman, D S ^a,c   Reeves, S W ^b   Bass, E B ^b   Lubomski, L H ^a   Fleisher, L A ^a   Schein, O D ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ARTICLE; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SEDATION; TOPICAL ANESTHESIA;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; AGED; ANESTHESIA; ANESTHESIA, INTRAVENOUS; ANESTHESIA, LOCAL; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INJECTIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 1542407180     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.028258     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Katz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, et al. Injectable versus topical anesthesia for cataract surgery: patient perceptions of pain and side effects. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2054-60.
2. Friedman DS, Bass EB, Lubomski LL, et al. Synthesis of the literature on the effectiveness of regional anesthesia for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2003 (in press).
3. Au Eong KG, Lim TH, Lee HM, et al. Subjective visual experience during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation using retrobulbar anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:842-6.
4. Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: a review. J Health Econ 1985;5:1-30.
5. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: an empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences 1976;10:128-36.