Interpreting mitchell's constructivism: Reply to altman and davies

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association

Volumn 51, Issue SUPPL., 2003, Pages 163-179

  Eagle, Morris N ^a,b,c,d   Wakefield, Jerome C ^b,e   Wolitzky, David L ^b  

^a ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Toronto Inst Contemp Psychoanal   (Canada)

^e NYU ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ART; CONCEPT FORMATION; EMOTION; HUMAN; MENTAL FUNCTION; MENTAL HEALTH; NOTE; ORGANIZATION; PSYCHOANALYSIS; THEORY; THINKING; TRANSFERENCE;

EID: 1542404973     PISSN: 00030651     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. EAGLE, M., WOLITZKY, D., & WAKEFIELD, J.C. (2001). The analyst's knowledge and authority: A critique of the "new view" in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 49:457-489.
2. FREUD, S. (1916-1917). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis, Part 3. Standard Edition 11:243-496.
3. MEISSNER, W.W. (1998). Review of S.A. Mitchell's Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Books 9:419-423.
4. MITCHELL, S.A. (1998). The analyst's knowledge and authority. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 67:1-31.
5. _ (2000). Reply to Silverman. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17:153-159.
6. OGDEN, T. (1997). Reverie and Interpretation: Sensing Something Human. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
7. RENIK, O. (1996). The perils of neutrality. Psychoanalytic Quarterly 65:495-517.
8. SILVERMAN, D.K. (2000). An interrogation of the relational turn. Psychoanalytic Psychology 17:146-152.